2
Evidence-Based Practice Project: Picot Paper
Many patients from the minority groups in the United States have been having a problem reaching the specialist the moment they need them. The minority groups consisting mainly of African Americans make around 20% of the total American population. Accordingly, in 2019, reports indicate that the minority groups’ household income stood at $40,165 below that of the white people (Qualified Health Centers). Accordingly, most minority groups live in the south as freemen. Consequently, the healthcare concern is that most patients are experiencing the problem of accessing specialists for their different types of disease.
Accordingly, patients are significantly finding it difficult to easily reach specialists, which is a significant issue affecting most of them. Often, the patients are referred to the specialist regarding their type of diseases, but there is no meaningful connection between the current healthcare provider handling the patients and the specialist. This is always an issue as the patients are forced to search the alternative methods of reaching the specialist. For instance, through the specialists’ use or contact them through phone calls or emails (Smith, & Hughes 2018). Moreover, even those suffering from chronic diseases also find it is difficult to see their specialists at the right time for the disease’s checkup. This has rough about a lot of frustrations and death among the people.
Generally, these problems have been brought about because no developed policies or technology system would facilitate coordinated care among the stakeholders. As a result, the patients do not experience problems and frustrate while reaching out to the referred specialist for their various diseases (Chartrand, 2019). Furthermore, this kind of incorporation in healthcare facilities has led to patients suffering as the illness intensifies as time goes on. Accordingly, the mortality rate has drastically increased since some patients are in critical conditions, yet they do not know how to go about it when they are given referrals (HAVENS et al., 2019).
Consequently, developing technology systems for facilitating coordination care among the healthcare stakeholders will greatly help curb this problem. In this way, there will be a connection between the current healthcare handling of the patients and the specialists. As a result, the patients will be able to conduct their referrals efficiently for their treatment. Through this, they will be guaranteed timely treatment for their various illnesses, enhancing their quick health restoration and recovery. The main goal of the health care facilities is to provide quality care to the patients and protect the health of the patients, and that precisely what the developed technology will do to the patients (Chartrand, 2019). In this case, system technology development will facilitate appropriate and effective coordination and delivery of healthcare services across the systems.
Thus, technology will serve as an essential tool for improving the quality of healthcare and safety among patients. Accordingly, the technology help following the healthcare care services policy, public health policies, and global healthcare policies to ensure patients from the minority groups in the United States get timely medications for their various illnesses through reaching their specialists in time.
Compared to Developing policies to improve coordination care, the technology system will go a long way in offering healthcare services in the most convenient ways. This is because there will be coordination between the patients and specialists. On the other hand, the development of the policies will serve the healthcare providers only, without improving the coordination among the patient and specialist (Chartrand, 2019). Overall, the technology system will improve the clinical outcome due to significant facilitation of care coordination and improved practice (Qualified Health Centers).
Moreover, the outcome of applying the technology system in the healthcare facilities is improved good healthcare services (Cohen, & Adler-Milstein 2017). The patients will be able to access the healthcare providers, especially their specialists, for further treatment. In addition, improved communication between the patients and specialists will help better assess the patient’s information, which will enhance treatment compliance. Generally, system technology will significantly change the landscape of healthcare.
The implementation period for the system technology will take three months. Within this period, there will be a significant improvement in care coordination in the healthcare facility (Chartrand, 2019). By the end of the implementation time, the anticipated goal is to ensure that patients constantly communicate with their specialists.
Accordingly, nursing science, social health determinant, epidemiologic, genomic genetic data greatly influence and help manage various diseases among the patients. In addition, nursing science has provided interventions such as coordination of healthcare through proper medication, thus promoting wellness and prevention of illness. Also, nurses offer the appropriate referrals for the patients for further treatment.
Furthermore, healthcare determinants such as education level, physical environment, socioeconomic status, and employment provide insight and essential information about the cause and the proper management required to improve the health among the minority groups, which will immensely reduce health disparities. For instance, people’s conduct and behavior can determine the reason behind increased cases of a specific type of disease among the population. Epidemiological data is applied to examine the prevalence of the illness among the minority group. Accordingly, the genomic and genetic information is essential to access the risk factors since some can be inherited.
References
Smith, J., & Hughes, D. (2018). A survey of referred patients experiencing problems with complete dentures. The Journal Of Prosthetic Dentistry, 60(5), 583-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 3913(88)90218-1
Chartrand, H. (2019). Understanding of Care Coordination by Healthcare Providers and Staff at Federally
Qualified Health Centers: A Qualitative Analysis. Community Medicine And Public Health Care, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24966/cmph-1978/100041
Cohen, G., & Adler-Milstein, J. (2017). Meaningful use care coordination criteria: Perceived barriers and benefits among primary care providers. Journal Of The American Medical Informatics Association, 23(e1), e146-e151. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv147
Havens, D., Vasey, J., Gittell, J., & Lin, W. (2019). Relational coordination among nurses and other providers: impact on the quality of patient care. Journal Of Nursing Management, 18(8), 926-937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01138.x
Appendix A
PICOT Question
For patients experiencing problems in accessing specialists (P), the use of technology system in facilitating coordination care among care stakeholders (I) if compared with development of policies regarding coordination care (C) can lead to improved good healtcare services (O) over a period of three months (T).
Appendix B
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☒ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☒ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☒ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☒ Topic is well defined.
☒ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☒ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☒ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☒ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☒ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☒ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing
The post 2 Evidence-Based Practice Project: Picot Paper Many patients from the minority groups appeared first on PapersSpot.