✍ ️Get Free Writing Help
WhatsApp
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
Agent
How can we help with you?
Hi, how can I help?

Month:

Discussion: Historical Lenses

In this discussion, you will consider how historical lenses can affect the study of a historical topic. Select one of...
By

My assignment requires operating spss and analyzing the data. My university is in Uk so plagiarism needs to be checked via turnitin. I have both spss as well as turnitin. I just need commands, so that i can give the output and i need the written content to be done by the expert. Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this assessment and this module, you will have demonstrated your ability to: 1. Design, explore and evaluate a psychometric scale. 2. Analyse and interpret advanced statistical techniques using appropriate software for statistical analysis (SPSS). Summative Assessment(s) [Graded Assessment(s)] Assessment: Coursework – SPSS Portfolio Assessment Component: Assessment weighting: Length: Assessed module learning outcome(s): 1 100% Q1 – 50% Q2 and Q3 – 50% Q1 = 3,000 words (Not marked after this limit) Q2 & Q3 = 1,000 words (not marked after this limit) No limit for individual questions, but recommend approximately 500 words each 1 & 2 Submission date/time: Provisional feedback released: Completed final work: Thursday 11th August 2022 by 23:59 hrs UK time Completed final work feedback (provisional grade): Monday 5th September 2022, 09:00 UK time. Your work will be marked anonymously: Markers will not be aware of which student has written the work that is being marked. Provisional marks and feedback will have been reviewed by an internal moderator (member of teaching staff who have not been involved with the module). A sample of your marks and feedback will then be reviewed by our external examiner and the ratified mark will be published following the assessment board which will be held in September 2022. Assessment Overview There is one piece of coursework for this module comprising a 4000-word portfolio of statistical tests that address the three questions set below. This portfolio is worth 100% of your module mark. The portfolio must be written in English. You will be presented with three research questions and data sets. For each question you are required to conduct and report the findings of an appropriate analysis of the data provided, in the report style shown during the module. You should screen the data prior to any analyses and routinely report appropriate estimates of effect size and other relevant statistical information where appropriate. You should also include appropriate and clearly expressed predictions. The word limit for the portfolio is 4000 words (maximum) and includes in-text citations, tables and figures. The word could DOES NOT include your title page (including declaration statement), reference list or appendices. There is no 10% variance applied. Words beyond the 4000-word limit will NOT be reviewed for marking. Please note that module staff cannot help you with questions regarding specific exercises in this assessment. This is because a fundamental part of this assessment is for you to be able to identify the statistical analyses that you need to conduct to address the exercise questions, conduct the appropriate analyses, and then write them up in the correct manner. Module staff can support you with more general assessment related questions including general questions about analyses, but not specific questions (e.g., “do I do a regression for question two?”, etc.). ALL of the statistical processes and tests that you are required to conduct have been taught through the individual units on the module. You are not required to learn any additional tests to enable you to complete this portfolio. Portfolio Questions Question 1 You will be provided with a dataset containing responses from women to three quality of life measures. This can be found in the assessment tab on the module pages and is titled “Question 1 – Data set”. Using this dataset, you need to choose the appropriate tests to summarise the scale and then conduct a factor analysis on the data to indicate subscales, which you will name and produce a written report. You should also calculate the reliability and validity of the scale. You should include the following sections: Prediction(s): These should be clearly written and explain what you would predict based upon the description of the research question, including a brief introduction to the topic area. • Results: This section should begin with coverage of data screening. You should then write up the results of the chosen statistical test(s) in the reporting style you will be shown during the relevant unit on the module. • Discussion: There should be a brief (i.e. a few sentences) discussion of the findings of the results in light of the research question. • Appendix (not included in word count): Please include any calculations and all relevant SPSS outputs (e.g. data screening checks, analyses etc.) as appendices. (Please provide an appendix for each question, rather than a single appendix at the end). A researcher wants to measure women’s quality of life. After conducting some focus groups and consultations with experts, the researcher has designed a new measure. They have asked nearly 300 women to complete the new scale along with two established measures: the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992) and the EQ-5D (EuroQol Group, 1990). Missing values are coded as 99 and 999 in the database. You are asked to help refine the scale by identifying any subscales and by examining its validity and reliability. Using factor analysis, you should provide advice about how many subscales there are and what they appear to measure. Finally, you are asked to recommend any further testing that should be performed in the future to ensure the measure’s psychometric properties. EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy, 16, 199-208. Ware, J.E & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care, 30, 473-483. For Questions 2 and 3, you are presented with research questions and their accompanying data sets. For each question, you are required to conduct and then report the findings of an appropriate analysis of the data provided, in the reporting style shown during the module. You should screen the data prior to any analyses and routinely report appropriate estimates of effect size and other relevant statistical information where appropriate. You should also include appropriate and clearly expressed predictions. For each question, you should include the following sections: • Prediction(s): These should be clearly written and explain what you would predict based upon the description of the research question, including a brief introduction to the research topic. • Results: This section should begin with coverage of data screening (testing assumptions). You should then write up the results of the chosen statistical test(s) in the reporting style you will be shown during the module. • Discussion: There should be a brief (i.e. a few sentences) discussion of the findings of the results in light of the research question. • Appendix (not included in word count): Please include any calculations and all relevant SPSS outputs (e.g. data screening checks, analyses etc.) as appendices. (Please provide an appendix for each question, rather than a single appendix at the end). Question 2 A researcher wanted to examine whether a self-management programme was useful in helping to improve adherence with lipid reduction medication use amongst patients with coronary heart disease. The researcher has asked you to examine: 1) whether the number of training hours on the programme predicts medication adherence, and 2) whether self-efficacy is a significant mediator within this relationship. You have been provided with the following variables: • Adherence score (number of days adhering to medication); • Self-efficacy; • Training hours (number of training hours on the programme); Participant number Gender Adherence score Self-efficacy Training hours 1 Male 9 51 6 2 Female 6 55 6 3 Female 6 56 3 4 Female 4 55 3 5 Male 7 62 5 6 Male 7 63 5 7 Female 8 64 5 8 Male 7 64 4 9 Female 8 73 6 10 Female 9 74 6 11 Male 9 73 5 12 Female 11 76 5 13 Female 12 77 5 14 Male 12 79 6 15 Female 12 88 6 16 Male 13 89 6 17 Female 13 90 6 18 Male 13 93 6 19 Female 13 95 7 20 Female 13 96 7 21 Male 13 98 7 22 Female 13 102 7 23 Female 13 103 7 24 Female 14 111 7 25 Male 14 112 7 26 Male 14 113 7 27 Female 14 114 7 28 Female 15 119 7 29 Female 15 121 7 30 Male 20 85 8 31 Male 22 70 8 32 Female 22 85 8 33 Female 26 74 9 34 Female 25 124 9 35 Female 23 51 9 36 Male 27 124 10 37 Male 21 63 10 38 Male 21 72 10 39 Male 11 79 10 40 Female 4 72 10 41 Male 19 80 10 42 Male 4 84 11 43 Male 13 113 11 44 Female 22 94 14 45 Male 14 123 14 46 Female 25 83 15 47 Male 20 78 11 48 Female 18 90 10 49 Male 23 93 13 50 Male 15 110 12 51 Male 14 114 10 52 Male 10 94 13 53 Male 27 119 14 54 Female 4 79 15 55 Female 5 89 10 56 Male 20 81 12 57 Male 28 117 10 58 Female 22 60 14 59 Female 8 120 14 60 Male 15 111 13 Question 3 Data on the relationship between personality profile and nicotine dependence may help health professionals to design and improve programs for the treatment and prevention of this dependence. A researcher obtains three groups of 20 participants; 1) current smokers; 2) individuals who have given up smoking for more than twelve months; and 3) individuals who have never smoked. In addition to providing their smoking status, participants completed Costa and McCrae’s (1992) NEO Personality Inventory Revised (NEO-PI-R). Do levels of extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism differ amongst these three groups? Participant number Smoking status Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism 1 Current 138 93 85 2 Current 164 120 71 3 Current 142 88 98 4 Current 150 151 94 5 Current 130 86 22 6 Current 146 87 101 7 Current 167 171 25 8 Current 147 111 77 9 Current 168 114 95 10 Current 153 66 104 11 Current 159 85 95 12 Current 142 123 87 13 Current 168 162 94 14 Current 143 135 19 15 Current 139 97 57 16 Current 166 85 100 17 Current 167 68 57 18 Current 134 156 27 19 Current 144 97 75 20 Current 161 65 74 21 Ex-smoker 155 90 105 22 Ex-smoker 138 105 88 23 Ex-smoker 151 108 65 24 Ex-smoker 160 85 120 25 Ex-smoker 132 166 44 26 Ex-smoker 143 94 82 27 Ex-smoker 160 107 52 28 Ex-smoker 124 135 98 29 Ex-smoker 153 93 63 30 Ex-smoker 168 79 106 31 Ex-smoker 123 114 88 32 Ex-smoker 156 75 107 33 Ex-smoker 120 112 89 34 Ex-smoker 102 143 114 35 Ex-smoker 124 56 108 36 Ex-smoker 148 128 112 37 Ex-smoker 107 75 111 38 Ex-smoker 135 57 64 39 Ex-smoker 127 86 59 40 Ex-smoker 129 61 83 41 Never smoked 100 55 109 42 Never smoked 105 83 136 43 Never smoked 117 167 61 44 Never smoked 109 155 120 45 Never smoked 76 108 65 46 Never smoked 114 120 141 47 Never smoked 105 165 116 48 Never smoked 108 111 110 49 Never smoked 98 142 103 50 Never smoked 86 106 67 51 Never smoked 93 129 107 52 Never smoked 100 140 134 53 Never smoked 96 69 51 54 Never smoked 79 89 66 55 Never smoked 72 62 87 56 Never smoked 86 137 52 57 Never smoked 97 134 113 58 Never smoked 118 72 139 59 Never smoked 87 173 116 60 Never smoked 91 75 50 Formative feedback opportunities Formative feedback opportunities are designed to help you with your summative assessment. Formative activities are not assessed and do not contribute to your module mark. These are opportunities for you to apply, practice and make sense of the learning materials and content that you have worked with so that you are competent to apply your learning in your summative assessment. These opportunities will mainly take place during the end of unit activities and in the corresponding discussions on MS Teams. Assessment Rubric Your work will be marked based on the rubric below. Criteria Excellent (70 – 100%) Very Good (60 – 69%) Good/ Satisfactory (50 – 59%) Unsatisfactory (40 – 49%) Poor/Very Poor (1 – 39%) Prediction and analysis Predictions for the questions are clearly written and appropriate and explain what you would predict based upon the description of the research question. Provides predictions for the questions based upon the description of the research question, however there are some minor errors / misunderstandings. Provides predictions for the questions based upon the description of the research question, however there are some errors / misunderstandings. Fails to provide accurate or complete predictions for the questions based upon the description of the research question. Fails to provide predictions for the questions based upon the description of the research question. Data screening Provides insightful descriptions of the data screening process using appropriate psychological terminology. Supported by references where appropriate. Describes the data screening process in detail using appropriate psychological terminology. Describes the data screening process using appropriate psychological terminology. There may be some errors / misunderstandings in reporting. Fails to satisfactorily screen the data for the questions. Fails to screen the data for the questions. Results The correct tests are identified, justified and reported correctly with no errors. All relevant information is included. There is an insightful description of the results using appropriate psychological terminology. Supported by references where appropriate. The correct tests are identified and reported clearly and accurately with minimal errors or missing elements. The results are described in detail using appropriate psychological terminology. The correct tests are identified and reported competently/to a passing standard, but there may be some weaknesses, errors or missing elements. The results are described using appropriate psychological terminology. There may be some errors / misunderstandings in reporting. The correct tests are not identified or expressed to a passing standard and there may be considerable weaknesses, errors or missing elements. The description of the results is unsatisfactory. The correct tests are not identified and the answer is expressed very poorly, with considerable misunderstandings, errors or missing elements. The results are not described. Discussion There is a short discussion of the findings of the results, demonstrating a thorough understanding of what the results can tell us. There is a short discussion of the findings of relevant results. There is a short discussion of the findings of relevant results, however there may be some minor errors or missing information (good). There may also be some evidence of weaknesses, errors or missing elements (satisfactory). The discussion of the findings may be missing most of the information or include many errors. The discussion of the findings is missing. Appendices All relevant calculations and SPSS outputs are included as appendices. Nearly all relevant calculations and SPSS outputs are included as appendices. Most of the relevant calculations and SPSS outputs are included as appendices, but some material may be missing. The relevant calculations and SPSS outputs may be missing from the appendices. The relevant calculations and SPSS outputs are missing from the appendices. Presentation and expression Excellent standard of presentation and expression, with very well structured academic writing. Appropriate psychological language used throughout. Very good standard of presentation and expression, with very well structured academic writing. Consistent use of appropriate psychological language. Good/satisfactory standard of presentation and expression, with generally well-structured/ adequately-structured academic writing. Ability to use appropriate psychological language/terms. Unsatisfactory standard of presentation and expression, with inadequately structured academic writing. Limited ability to use appropriate psychological terms. Poor standard of presentation, expression and academic writing that is not up to postgraduate standard. Inability to use appropriate psychological terms. Useful Links Library: https://www.derby.ac.uk/services/library/ Assessment regulations: https://www.derby.ac.uk/about/organisation/academic-regulations/ (sections F and E). Citing and referencing: https://www.derby.ac.uk/services/library/study-skills/citing-and-referencing/ Study Skills: https://www.derby.ac.uk/services/library/study-skills/ Study Advisor Scheme: https://www.derby.ac.uk/services/library/study-skills/study-advisor-scheme/ Essay Writing: https://www.derby.ac.uk/services/library/study-skills/essay-writing/ Turnitin (video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=822ZoLhsNZE IT Service Centre: https://www.derby.ac.uk/services/its/it-services-for-students/help-and-advice/ Personal Development Planning: https://courseresources.derby.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/institution/UDOL/Student%20Portal%20Pages/Personal%20Development%20Planning%20in%20the%20Digital%20Age/Personal%20Development%20Planning%20in%20the%20Digital%20Age_00_00_Welcome.html Cite Them Right: https://www-citethemrightonline-com.ezproxy.derby.ac.uk/

GET ALL YOUR ACADEMIC HELP AT ESSAYLINK.NET My assignment requires operating spss and analyzing the data. My university is in...
By

QSO 489 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview The final project for this course is the creation of a SWOT analysis, project planning outline, and professional and personal reflection. As the final step in your journey toward your Bachelor of Science degree in Operations Management, you will complete a capstone that integrates the knowledge and skills that you have developed in previous coursework by conducting an analysis of an organization and applying continuous improvement practices for achieving sustainable operations and effective resource management. You will also reflect on your journey through the Operational Management program and how you plan to position yourself professionally. This capstone will be assessed somewhat differently than other courses you have taken online at SNHU. There are three separate components that operate together to comprise the whole capstone experience. For the capstone evaluation, you will be evaluated on all three as a unit. Your instructor will guide you through this process, keeping a running narrative of your strengths and weaknesses in relation to the outcomes as you progress through the class. The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final project will be submitted in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: • QSO-489-01: Assess and apply operations management theory and best practices effectively in a global environment to achieve operational goals in support of business strategies • QSO-489-02: Evaluate and apply appropriate continuous improvement practices for achieving sustainable operations in a given environment • QSO-489-03: Utilize quantitative and qualitative techniques for solving problems with processes, procedures, and products • QSO-489-04: Evaluate the internal and external factors that influence business sustainability and competitive advantages in business • QSO-489-05: Make operations-management decisions that create value while minimizing risk for the purposes of meeting specified customer requirements • QSO-489-06: Develop and apply appropriate resource management techniques for promoting accountability, sustainability, and organizational effectiveness Prompt You will select an organization in operations management that is currently facing competition from other service industries in the same area (e.g.., Verizon vs. Sprint, Apple vs. Dell, Longhorn Steakhouse vs. Outback Steakhouse, Chrysler vs. Chevrolet, etc.). After laying the foundation for understanding the selected organization by analyzing data from both quantitative and qualitative sources, you will then apply continuous improvement techniques for identifying potential solutions by developing a SWOT analysis on the selected organization, ultimately contributing to its long-term planning and sustainability. You will then develop potential solution(s) for addressing the identified weaknesses or threats (outlined in the SWOT) that would add value to the organization with minimal risk. This will also be accompanied by a project planning outline that will highlight how and when the proposed solution will be introduced, which should adhere to common industry-driven project management principles. Finally, you will reflect on your journey through the Operational Management program and how you plan to position yourself professionally through a third component in the form of a personal and professional reflection. Capstone Component One: SWOT Analysis For the first of three capstone components, you will develop a comprehensive, professional SWOT analysis that will help form long-term planning and sustainability strategies, outlined in a project management plan (PMP). First, you will want to lay the foundation for conducting your SWOT analysis by comprehensively describing the selected organization and discussing the issues or problems that the organization is facing. Overall, it is important to include information that is pertinent for comprehending the organization and its problems. It is up to you to establish a robust context for understanding and responding to the organization’s need(s). Part of establishing a solid framework for analyzing the organization is incorporating information that supports why the problem(s) exists and how it is valid. For instance, based on your chosen organization, you should include both a quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis that speak to the organization’s need and identified problem. After conducting a SWOT analysis, you will bring your analysis together by synthesizing the results and identifying potential solutions. The following sections should be included: I. Strengths: Identify the strengths of the organization. II. Weaknesses: Identify the weaknesses of the organization. III. Opportunities: Identify potential opportunities that the organization should explore in order to expand. IV. Threats: Identify external factors that could potentially negatively affect the organization. V. Improvements: Develop potential solution(s) addressing the identified weaknesses and threats that are listed in the SWOT that would add value to the organization with minimal risk. Capstone Component Two: Project Planning Outline After identifying necessary improvements in Component One, you will pick one solution to expand upon in a professional project plan. Here, you will develop an abbreviated project management plan (PMP) that showcases the essential steps you think would be effective in implementing your proposed solution. Based on your SWOT analysis, your abbreviated PMP should be presented in an outline format with proposed tasks needed for implementation that adhere to industrydriven project management principles. • What tasks are needed in order to implement the proposed solution in the organization? Each task must be written out with thorough detail and should be organized chronologically, based on logical and appropriate start and end times for each task. • In closing, identify the overall value added if the solution is implemented. For instance, the solution may be developed to increase service quality for customers or to increase revenue, increase product quality, and so on. Capstone Component Three: Professional and Personal Reflection For the third and final component of your capstone, you will write an essay in which you discuss the process and outcomes of this project, as well as how your coursework culminated in the capstone project. This may include discussions of unforeseen problems or obstacles, as well as any surprises. The essay should also discuss your identified strengths and problems that you encountered while completing the project. Finally, the essay will examine how the capstone project will be useful in the job market or in furthering your education. You should envision this component as a personal reflection on the capstone and your experience in the Operations Management program as a whole. For instance, relative to the capstone, you could discuss what you did (or intended to do), and then consider what worked well, what challenges you faced, and what you would do differently to make your experience better. In reflecting on your time here at SNHU, you might discuss where you started, where you are now, and where you see yourself going. Note that this component is not about evaluating the capstone itself but rather your experience within the capstone project. Some of the issues that you could address in this final component of this capstone may include: • Overall, what was your capstone experience like? • Reflect on the significance of the capstone in relation to your own experience at SNHU. • What connections do you see between your capstone and your academic program? • How can learning about the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data be useful in your career? • The SWOT allows you to analyze internal and external factors. How can this tool be helpful after graduation? Milestones Milestone One: SWOT Analysis In Module Three, you will submit a SWOT analysis draft. You will develop a comprehensive, professional SWOT analysis that will help form long-term planning and sustainability strategies, outlined in a project management plan (PMP). This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Project Planning Outline In Module Five, you will submit a project planning outline draft. You will pick one solution to expand upon in a professional project plan. Here, you will develop an abbreviated project management plan (PMP) that showcases the essential steps that you think would be effective in implementing your proposed solution. Based on your SWOT analysis, your abbreviated PMP should be presented in an outline format with proposed tasks needed for implementation that adhere to industry-driven project management principles. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Final Submission: SWOT Analysis, Project Planning Outline, and Professional and Personal Reflection In Module Seven, you will submit your SWOT analysis, project planning outline, and professional and personal reflection. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded using the Final Project Rubric. Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your final project must be 12–16 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. References should be cited using the latest edition of the American Psychological Association (APA) publication manual. You may include illustrations, photographs, graphs and charts, and other non-textual materials as needed to support the SWOT analysis (though all of the latter should be placed in an appendix or appendices if used). This rubric will be applied to all components as a whole, and no component will be assessed on its own. The “Possible Indicators of Success” are examples for you and the instructor of the types of concepts to look for to demonstrate proficiency. They are neither exhaustive nor proscriptive and should be used as guides for illustrating how your capstone embodies the outcome. All outcomes are weighted equally. QSO-489-01: Assess and apply operations management theory and best practices effectively in a global environment to achieve operational goals in support of business strategies Possible Indicators of Success Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to assess and apply business strategies for identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an organization? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to assess how organizational goals and project planning may evolve within a global environment? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to assess how operational goals designed to achieve strategic or long-term goals connect with the global environment? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to apply and justify operations management theories or best practices to an organization? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to evaluate an organization’s potential to achieve success in reaching operational goals? QSO-489-02: Evaluate and apply appropriate continuous improvement practices for achieving sustainable operations in a given environment Possible Indicators of Success Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to appropriately apply continuous improvement tools to an organization? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to evaluate outcomes of continuous improvement tools that are designed to help form long-term planning and sustainability strategies? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to evaluate relevant business environments for their influence on achieving sustainable operations? QSO-489-03: Utilize quantitative and qualitative techniques for solving problems with processes, procedures, and products Possible Indicators of Success Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to appropriately utilize quantitative and qualitative techniques for understanding and identifying organizational need? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to evaluate organizational problem(s) and validate identified problem(s) with data? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to use data to guide decision making in solving problems? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to identify the relevance of an analysis of qualitative and quantitative data in various business environments? QSO-489-04: Evaluate the internal and external factors that influence business sustainability and competitive advantages in business Possible Indicators of Success Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to evaluate internal and external factors for establishing sustainability and a competitive advantage in business? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to assess the strategic effects of the identified problem on the organization? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to compare and contrast a selected organization to competition from other service industries in the same area? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to evaluate an organization’s level of sustainability based on the current business environment? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to identify the relevance of an analysis of internal and external factors in various business environments? QSO-489-05: Make operations-management decisions that create value while minimizing risk for the purposes of meeting specified customer requirements Possible Indicators of Success Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to appropriately develop and offer solutions to identified risks? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to make effective operations management decisions by highlighting the value of identified solutions at a strategic, intermediate, or short-term level? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to make decisions or formulate solutions that are designed to meet specified customer requirements? QSO-489-06: Develop and apply appropriate resource management techniques for promoting accountability, sustainability, and organizational effectiveness Possible Indicators of Success Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to apply necessary and appropriate resource management techniques for improving organizational effectiveness and promoting accountability and sustainability? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to develop and communicate a plan for resource management? Does the capstone demonstrate the student’s ability to analyze organizational effectiveness in relation to the management of their resources?

GET ALL YOUR ACADEMIC HELP AT ESSAYLINK.NET QSO 489 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview The final project for this...
By

Exxon Mobil QSO 489 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric During this process, you will be responsible for submitting a draft of SWOT analysis. You will develop a comprehensive, professional SWOT analysis that will help form long-term planning and sustainability strategies, outlined in a project management plan (PMP). Lay the foundation for conducting your SWOT analysis by comprehensively describing the selected organization and discussing the issues or problems that the organization is facing. Overall, it is important to include information that is pertinent for comprehending the organization and its problems. It is up to you to establish a robust context for understanding and responding to the organization’s need(s). Part of establishing a solid framework for analyzing the organization will be incorporating information that supports why the problem(s) exists and how it is valid. For instance, based on your chosen organization, you should include both a quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis that speak to the organization’s need and identified problem. After conducting a SWOT analysis, you will bring your analysis together by synthesizing the results and identifying potential solutions. The following sections should be included: • Strengths: Identify the strengths of the organization. • Weaknesses: Identify the weaknesses of the organization. • Opportunities: Identify potential opportunities that the organization should explore in order to expand. • Threats: Identify external factors that could potentially negatively affect the organization. • Improvements: Develop potential solution(s) addressing the identified weaknesses and threats listed in the SWOT that would add value to the organization with minimal risk. Guidelines for Submission: Milestone One must be four to five pages in length with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three citations in APA format. Rubric Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Not Proficient (0%) Value Strengths Identifies the strengths of the organization Does not identify the strengths of the organization 18 Weaknesses Identifies the weaknesses of the organization Does not identify the weaknesses of the organization 18 Opportunities Identifies potential opportunities the organization should explore in order to expand Does not identify potential opportunities the organization should explore in order to expand 18 Threats Identifies external factors that could potentially negatively affect the organization Does not identify external factors that could potentially negatively affect the organization 18 Improvements Develops potential solution(s) addressing the identified weaknesses and threats listed in the SWOT that would add value to the organization with minimal risk Does not develop potential solution(s) addressing the identified weaknesses and threats listed in the SWOT that would add value to the organization with minimal risk 18 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Earned Total 100%

GET ALL YOUR ACADEMIC HELP AT ESSAYLINK.NET Exxon Mobil QSO 489 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric During this process, you...
By
Don`t copy text!