SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY | My Assignment Tutor -

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 CASE No……….. BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant And WOLFARM & HART ………………………………………… Respondent Before: ………………………………………… ………………………………………… ………………………………………… 01/12/2020 Date of Hearing: ………………………… Allegations: After From June 2018 until February 2019, the Respondent failed to inform the firm that he had not attended the seminars or the examination session for the Certificate of Proficiency in Insolvency (CPI) in June 2018 for which the firm had paid for tuition, examination and professional student member fee. The Respondent thereby breached any, or all, of:Principle 2 of the SRA Standards and Regulations 2019 (“the Principles”);Principle 4 of the Principles;Principle 5 of the Principles. On numerous occasions between September 2018 and February 2019, the Respondent represented to senior colleagues at the firm, his employer, that he had attended the CPI course and had both entered for and passed the CPI examination. The Respondent thereby breached any, or all, of:Principle 2 of the Principles;Principle 4 of the Principles;Principle 5 of the Principles. In January 2019, the Respondent produced a professional biography for external and internal marketing purposes knowing that it contained false and/or misleading information about his skills and experience and that, if published, the biography would mislead the public as to his skills and expertise. The Respondent thereby breached any, or all, of:Principle 2 of the Principles;Principle 4 of the Principles;Principle 5 of the Principles;Paragraph 1.4 of the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs 2019 (“the Code”);Paragraph 8.8 of the Code.