Levels of AchievementCriteriaProficient (100%)Competent (75%)Just Competent (50%)Novice (25%)Overall Presentation(including formatting andgrammar)10%Presentation of work isexcellent, grammaticallycorrect with highlycommendable writing style.Work is clearly presented with gooduse of English. Presentation meets thecriteria.Work is not clearly presented.Presentation meets some criteria.Work is illegible, poor use ofEnglish. Presentation does notmeet the criteria required.Proper use ofLiterature30%Critical analysis of a widerange of relevant … Continue reading “Overall Presentation | My Assignment Tutor”
Levels of AchievementCriteriaProficient (100%)Competent (75%)Just Competent (50%)Novice (25%)Overall Presentation(including formatting andgrammar)10%Presentation of work isexcellent, grammaticallycorrect with highlycommendable writing style.Work is clearly presented with gooduse of English. Presentation meets thecriteria.Work is not clearly presented.Presentation meets some criteria.Work is illegible, poor use ofEnglish. Presentation does notmeet the criteria required.Proper use ofLiterature30%Critical analysis of a widerange of relevant literature.5-10 External sources ofinformation included andwell-integrated into report.Reference list complete andwell formatted (according tolatest APA guidelines).Presents work that draws on relevantresearch/literature to support rationalarguments and discussions. Accurateand coherent use of relevant researchand literature. Small problems withformatting but able to identify sourcesused.Adequate evidence of supportivereading without the use of argumentand discussion. Some inaccuracies incitation of literature. External sourcesmay be used but of low quality (wiki,web pages); attempt at referencing intext, attempt at constructing areference list.Failure to use appropriatecitation or incomplete orinappropriate referencing.Demonstration ofcomprehension,knowledge and analysis30%Analytical contentdemonstrates excellentcritical thinking skills,knowledge andcomprehension, able tosynthesise learning and applyto field of study.Demonstrates ability tocritically evaluate.Content demonstrates relevance. Verygood understanding/explanation ofprofessional focus. Thoroughunderstanding of facts and theories tosupport arguments. Demonstratescreative use of material. Evidence ofcritical thinking in a realistic logicalmanner.Content demonstrates relevance.Adequate understanding/explanationof professional focus. Identifies andaddresses key aspects of a minimumacceptable level. Limited evidence ofanalytical thinking.Content lacks relevance.Professional focus is notunderstood or explained.Theoretical concepts andframeworks inappropriatelyselected.Interpretation andapplication30%Able to critically evaluate andmake judgments, which arerealistic, creative andoriginal.Interpret brief correctly. Evidence ofbeing able to examine and evaluatecritically using appropriate theoreticalframeworks. Points raised re appliedand fully integrated into thediscussion.Interprets brief correctly. Evidence ofbeing able to evaluate a situation in alogical way, identifying aspects ofproblem. Able to set own experienceswithin a wider context and take anobjective stance.Wrong interpretation of theassessment questions. Noapplication of the learntmaterials.
