SOLUTION: dedication and appreciation | My Assignment Tutor

1Assignment 2: Dissertation (7000 words)Due week 28 70% of overall gradeSubmission 1 copies via TurnitinSuggested Layout of dissertation: Title PagesPages with name of project, research andsupervisor, dedication and appreciationAbstract300-word summary of the entire project generallypresented in one paragraph (not part of word count)Table of ContentsIncluding lists of tables, figures, photographs (notpart of word count)Chapter One – Introduction 1000wordsA brief introduction to the entire thesis or reportChapter Two – Literature review 1800wordsContains the theoretical framework for the researchprojectChapter Three – Researchmethodology 1200 wordsContains the methodological framework for theresearch projectChapter Four – Data analysis anddiscussion 2000 wordsContains the analytical framework for the researchprojectChapter Five – Conclusions andrecommendations 1000 wordsContains the fully-developed, well-conceptualisedconclusions from the research and usually a bulletpoint list of the recommendations drawn from theconclusionsReferencesA complete list of all sources used within the text inHarvard Referencing style (not part of wordcount)AppendicesEach appendix contains a document/table/figurerelevant to the research, and references anddiscussed in the research. Typically copies of lettersseeking and granting permission for the researchare contained in the appendices; copies of formsdesigned for the research such as informed consentform; copies of any data collection methods used inthe research, for example a copy of thequestionnaire, interview/focus group schedule. Longlists, and large tables and figures can be placed inappendices. (not part of wordcount) 2 Grading Scheme for Assignment 2 for MN6P12Marking criteriaLettergradeMarkrecordedThe work shows evidence of:Excellent clearly expressed and focused aims and objectives with evidence of verywide reading and research in recent publications, relevant books and journals.Comprehensive and coherent methodology with exceptional explanation of validity,reliability, sampling and ethics.Very comprehensive and analytical account of the study with excellent criticaldiscussion linking research to previous academic research.Outstanding conclusion showing excellent critical understanding of the study’slimitation and its place in the field of research.Excellent structure, very coherent and logical, easy to follow through.Evidence of exceptional academic writing and excellent referencing in text and listfollowing Harvard system without mistakes.A70 – 100The work shows evidence of:Very good clearly expressed and focused aims and objectives with evidence of widereading and research in recent publications, relevant books and journals.Very good and clear methodology with good explanation of validity, reliability,sampling and ethics.A comprehensive analysis and some critical discussion with regard to previousacademic research demonstrated.Very good conclusion showing good critical understanding of the study’s limitationand its place in the field of research.Coherent and logical structure throughout.Evidence of very good academic writing and some minor errors in referencing.B60 – 69The work shows:Clearly expressed and focused aims and objectives withevidence of some reading and researchMethodology is clear, but with some parts missing.A largely descriptive analysis with some discussion and linkto previous academic research.Clear conclusion showing some understanding of thestudy’s limitation and its place in the field of research.Coherent and logical structure in most parts provided.Evidence of good academic writing and good referencing, but improvement possible.C50 – 59The work shows:Some aims and objectives with limited evidence of reading andresearch.Methodology attempted but with significant shortcomings.A descriptive and superficial analysis with limited links to previousresearch.Some conclusion showing hazy understanding of the study’slimitation and its place in the field of research.Some structure detectable, but not very coherent or logical.Evidence of basic academic writing; follows Harvard system, but notconsistent throughout.D40 – 49 3 No aims and objectives, no appropriate reading evident.Deficient methodology.Insufficiently analysed study and no connection to previous research.Insufficient conclusion with no evidence of understanding of researchNo clear structure evident.Writing style is inappropriate and no in text referencing or reference listF130 – 39Does not address the task set. Little evidence of understanding either the task or thesubject matter. No evidence of scholarship.F2Under30Fail – Non-submission.F30