This week, you will take an in-depth look at the treatment of
This week, you will take an in-depth look at the treatment of a special population. For this assignment, prepare a presentation about an evidenced-based practice, which includes treatment protocols that have been researched and found to be efficacious for a particular group of offenders. The audience for this presentation will be mental health practitioners and administrators. You may use the special population you have selected for your Signature Assignment, or you may pick another population of interest for this week’s assignment. Specifically, your presentation must include the following: Information about offender group to be helped. Overview of evidence-based practice treatment program. Explanation of basic skills or knowledge necessary to implement this program effectively. Discussion of research related to the efficacy of the program. Any issues related to utilizing this treatment program in a forensic setting. Support your presentation with at least two sources from peer-reviewed journal articles. Length: 7-10 slides (with a separate reference slide) Notes Length: 100–150 words for each slide Create a professional presentation that incorporates appropriate animations, transitions, graphics, and speaker notes. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists. Be sure to add a reference slide or transition for all the references you use.[supanova_question]
Many organizations publicly define who they are through their vision, mission, and
Many organizations publicly define who they are through their vision, mission, and values statements. You can do the same as individuals. This exercise is very similar to organizational vision, mission, and values statement writing; there are slight modifications from the organizational format with respect to length, focus, and purpose. Keep in mind, this exercise is very introspective. It can be very challenging if taken seriously, and it can change your life. You are to write a Personal Philosophy of Leadership through your construction of a personal vision, mission, and values statement. You may wish to review the grading rubric prior to starting. Here are the steps to the process: 1. Vision Statement—the vision statement is a statement of what is possible; it is a picture of the future. Write a statement on what is possible for you and what the picture of the future is for you. This may be 1 paragraph (5–6 sentences) and up to a page. This is not an organizational vision statement. It is a personal vision statement; there are differences. 2. Mission Statement—the mission statement answers the vision. If your vision statement is to be or to do XYZ (what is possible), your mission statement is that you accomplish your vision by ABC (your reflections, thoughts, and method). This is a little different than the short corporate mission statements. This mission statement is a philosophy or creed that focuses on your character, your contributions or achievements, and on the values or principles upon which your attitudes are based. You may call it your Personal Constitution. You must answer the following: What is my purpose in life? What really counts? What do I want to accomplish in life? What legacy would you like to leave? You must also weave into this statement what type of leader you want to be, what your purpose is as a leader, and what legacy you would like to leave as a leader. To earn the greatest amount of points, the inclusion of a Christian worldview in this assignment is strongly encouraged; you should be praying and seeking God’s guidance in this exercise. Write a statement that includes all of the above material. This must be well thought out. This is not an “hour before it is due” exercise; that will be obvious. This statement is expected to be a minimum of 3–4 pages in length. This is not an organizational mission statement. It is a personal mission statement; there are differences. 3. Values Statement—in bullet form, list 5–10 values that are most important to you by which you would want others to define you. This is not an organizational values statement. It is a personal values statement; there are differences. 4. References—this paper must be at least 5 pages and include a minimum of 5–7 references to ground your thoughts. Use proper, current APA formatting for in-text citations and for the final reference page.[supanova_question]
500 words, 3 references Think about two environments you have experienced. The
500 words, 3 references Think about two environments you have experienced. The first environment is one that did not confront the brutal facts, where the people (and the truth) were not heard. Thesecond environment is one that did confront the brutal facts, wherepeople had a tremendous opportunity to be heard. What accounts for the difference between the two environments? If you do not have this life experience you are not off the hook—you will need to interview a leader who has these experiences and report on that. What does the contrast teach us about how to construct an environment where the truth is heard? Using strong Biblical support, explain how you relate this to your ChristianWorldview? Does your Christian Worldview help you develop this environment? Howdoes this relate to the ethical components of the Meese and Ortmeier text?[supanova_question]
500 words, 3 references Topic: Search Warrant Application and Execution Computer searches
500 words, 3 references Topic: Search Warrant Application and Execution Computer searches come in two varieties: one is to seize the computer or device and the other is to seize the data contained on the computer or device. Below are cases that pertain to the general principles of data searches: United States v. Loretta Otero 563 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2009) People v. Kelli Marie Balint 138 Cal. App. 4th 200 (2006) United States v. Payton 573 F.3d 859 (9th Cir. 2008) United States v. Dontavious M. Blake, Tara Jo Moore 868 F.3rd 960 (11th Cir. 2017) What were the key questions in each case? Compare and contrast each decision as it relates to the wording of the warrant, the scope of the warrant, and dominion and control issues mentioned or not in the warrant.[supanova_question]
500 words, 3 references Topic: Mobile Technology and Data at Rest If
500 words, 3 references Topic: Mobile Technology and Data at Rest If you have not read the Riley case, read it before answering this Forum. Robinson (Robinson v. United States, 414 U.S. 218 (1973)) established a “categorical” search incident to arrest rule: it applied to all arrests, regardless of the underlying factual circumstances. All of the pre-Gant litigation after Robinson concerned the scope of the permissible area searched: the body of the arrestee; the area around him; the vehicle in which he was arrested. Gant created a new rule for searches of motor vehicles incident to arrest and the two situations where a search are permitted is stated in the case: the police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest (A) only when the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or (B) when it is “reasonable to believe evidence relevant to the crime of arrest might be found in the vehicle.” Can hard drives, which are typically used to store music to play on the vehicle’s sound system, be searched? What about vehicle “black boxes,” that is, event recorders, which register many of the operations of the vehicle, including speed, braking, and air bag deployment? Or does Riley trump Gant, requiring a warrant?[supanova_question]