CSIS 483
Capstone Project Part III Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Introduction and conclusion
9 to 10 points
The introduction accurately outlines the project’s primary objectives and justifies necessity for a solution. The conclusion explains the outcomes and solutions with excellence. More than 2 scholarly sources and 400 words combined.
7 to 8 points
The introduction accurately outlines most of the project’s primary objectives and justifies necessity for a solution and/or the conclusion explains the outcomes and solutions. Minimum of 2 scholarly sources and 400 words combined.
1 to 6 points
The introduction accurately outlines some of the project’s primary objectives and/or inadequately justifies necessity for a solution and/or the conclusion fails to explain the outcomes and solutions and/or does not meet the minimum of 2 scholarly sources and 400 words combined.
0 points
Substantially unmet or not present
Plan and Report
9 to 10 points
Report details all objectives required in the instructions with excellent logic, organization, and supporting references. Report indicates mastery of the subject matter and exceeds the textbook examples in quality and detail. Over 1,500 words and 5 unique scholarly articles or respected whitepapers relevant to the solution.
7 to 8 points
Report details all objectives required in the instructions with adequate logic, organization, and supporting references and/or report indicates comprehension of the subject matter and meets the textbook examples in quality and detail and/or a minimum of 1,500 words and 5 unique scholarly articles or respected whitepapers relevant to the solution exist.
1 to 6 points
Report is missing objectives required in the instructions with adequate logic, organization, and supporting references and/or report indicates some misunderstanding of the subject matter and/or does not meet the textbook examples in quality and detail and/or a minimum of 1,500 words and 5 unique scholarly articles or respected whitepapers relevant to the solution does not exist.
0 points
Substantially unmet or not present
Project Solution
36 to 40 points
Capstone solution meets optimal industry best practices and standards within the configurations, designs, source code, syntax, and other computing instructions promised to the customer in the agreed upon schedule for this phase. Work completed parallels over 3 hours per person per week. Configurations, methods, parameters, rules, and/or styles are well supported by existing textbook or scholarly support. Student’s contribution is equal to peer contributions as shown in appropriate comments indicating authorship throughout the solution.
28 to 35 points
Capstone solution meets industry best practices and standards within the configurations, designs, source code, syntax, and other computing instructions promised to the customer in the agreed upon schedule for this phase and work completed parallels at least 3 hours per person per week and/or configurations, methods, parameters, rules, and/or styles are supported by existing textbook or scholarly support and student’s contribution is equal to peer contributions as shown in appropriate comments indicating authorship throughout the solution.
1 to 27 points
Capstone solution partially meets industry best practices and standards within the configurations, designs, source code, syntax, and other computing instructions promised to the customer in the agreed upon schedule for this phase and/or work completed does not parallel at least 3 hours per person per week and/or configurations, methods, parameters, rules, and/or styles are not properly supported by existing textbook or scholarly support and/or student’s contribution is not equal to peer contributions as shown in appropriate comments indicating authorship throughout the solution.
0 points
Substantially not working or not present and/or student’s contribution is significantly lacking in comparison to peer contributions.
APA, Grammar, and Spelling
27 to 30 points
Properly formatted APA paper with table of contents and references pages. Correct spelling and grammar used. Contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
21 to 26 points
Paper contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or some errors (3-7) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size, and line spacing.
1 to 20 points
Paper contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (7+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or substantial absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.
0 points
Paper contains more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling and/or numerous errors (10+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
Requirements
9 to 10 points
Solution is operational, shows mastery of the subject, and includes deliverables promised to customer within the assigned schedule for this phase. Over 2,000 words exist within the plan and/or report and over 7 unique scholarly sources exist that sufficiently support the solution. Student’s contribution is equal in quality and value as peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is core and fundamentally anchored throughout.
7 to 8 points
Solution is operational, shows comprehension of the subject, and includes within 80% of the deliverables promised to customer in the assigned schedule for this phase and/or 2,000 words exist within the plan and/or report and/or over 7 unique scholarly sources exist that sufficiently support the solution and/or the student’s contribution is equal in quality and value as peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is present and active, though could have been more core to the write-up.
1 to 6 points
Solution is partially operational, shows some comprehension of the subject, and/or includes less than 80% of the deliverables promised to customer in the assigned schedule for this phase and/or less than 2,000 words exist within the plan and/or report and/or less than 7 unique scholarly sources exist that sufficiently support the solution and/or the student’s contribution is not equal in quality and value as peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is barely present and only there in a superficial way.
0 points
Substantially unmet or not present and/or student’s contribution is significantly lacking in comparison to peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is not present.
Page 2 of 2
The post CSIS 483 Capstone Project Part III Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement appeared first on PapersSpot.
