Educational psychology theorists
Part I:
You will be required to research and complete the following Educational Psychology Theorists Table (pg. 2). You may find information in your book or use other academic sources to complete the table. You must provide references (so a reference page is required) and provide accurate citations using APA 7th edition. You will type directly in the table for this part using Times New Roman 12in font. DO NOT BOLD THE TEXT. It is important that you write your responses using correct grammar and punctuation. You may use short phrases and short sentences in the table, remember being accurate and thorough is more important than length,
Part II:
Describe components of 2-3 theories that best align with your thoughts about teaching and learning and justify your responses. Again, these theories are not your original ideas, so I expect to see citations (either paraphrasing or direct quotes, but see video, too many direct quotes is not good).
Part I:
Educational psychology theorists table
Theorists
Theory (Name)
theory description
Major key components
(explained and/or defined)
example of theory in practice (include possible student actions and teacher actions
piaget
vygotsky
bronfenbrenner
skinner
pavlov
Maslow
erickson
kohlberg
This table was adapted from:
Reference
Eggen, Paul and Donald Kauchak (2016). Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms (10th Edition). Prentice Hall, ISBN-10: 0135016681.
Part II:
Describe components of 2-3 theories that best align with your thoughts about teaching and learning and justify your responses. Again, these theories are not your original ideas, so I expect to see citations (either paraphrasing or direct quotes, but see video, too many direct quotes is not good). You must type this part of the assignment below on the inserted blank page that is located after the rubric and it is a portrait page NOT A) using APA 7TH edition. You must include citations and a reference page. YOU DO NOT NEED A TITLE PAGE nor ABSTRACT.
You must type this part of the assignment below on the inserted blank page that is located after the rubric and it is a portrait page NOT A) using APA 7TH edition. You must include citations and a reference page. YOU DO NOT NEED A TITLE PAGE nor ABSTRACT.
Categories
Highly Distinguished
100%
Distinguished
90%
Proficient
85%
Developing
70%
Beginning (50 pts and below)
Paper Requirement and Project Requirements
(80%)
Candidate provides a detailed and thorough description for each of the eight entries and all categories are correctly addressed: Theory (Name); Theory description; key components, and example of the theory in practice. Includes all pertinent information for each heading
Clearly shows a thorough understanding of the differences in each theory through careful word choice
and
Candidate provides reference page and all APA citations are formatted correctly, including responses writing using 12pt Times Roman font)
and
Includes citations and they are appropriately used and are a nature flow to support the stance being made.
and
Paper is saved as a Microsoft Word Document (doc. Or docx.) with their name in the saved title: For example:
Sharren_Thomas_Ed.Psy.Report
Candidate provides a thorough description for each of the eight entries and all categories are correctly addressed: Theory (Name); Theory description; key components, and example of the theory in practice.
or
Candidate provides reference page and all but 1 of the following are correct:
APA citations are formatted correctly, including responses writing using 12pt Times Roman font)
or
At least 1 citation is not appropriately used and is not a nature flow to support the stance being made.
or
Paper is saved as a Microsoft Word Document (doc. Or docx.) with their name in the saved title: For example:
Sharren_Thomas_Ed.Psy.Report
Candidate provides an adequate description for most (at least 6 or more) of the eight entries and all categories are correctly addressed: Theory (Name); Theory description; key components, and example of the theory in practice. Includes most of the pertinent information for each, and shows proficient understanding.
or
Candidate provides reference page but it includes errors and 2 of the following are not correct:
APA citations are formatted correctly, including responses writing using 12pt Times Roman font)
or
At least 2 citation are not appropriately used and is not a nature flow to support the stance being made.
Paper is saved as a Microsoft Word Document (doc. Or docx.) with their name in the saved title: For example:
Sharren_Thomas_Ed.Psy.Report
Candidate does not include clear and accurate descriptions for the eight entries and some categories are either has poorly addressed or not addressed most of the following components are poorly or not clearly addressed: Theory description; key components, and example of the theory in practice.
or
Several formatting issues with citations and reference page or no reference page.
or
Paper was not saved as a Microsoft word doc. Or docx or no name was included in saved title.
There are significant issues with paper. Significant APA citation and reference page not included.
Many incorrect and incomplete reporting for the eight entries and categories.
Paper not properly Saved
Quality of Writing
(20%)
(Organization)
Sequencing (Organization)
Grammar, spelling, punctuation etc.
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader. The author clearly addresses each topic as presented in the introduction.
Details are written in a way that address all required questions, but are support using references when appropriate and flow seamlessly for the reader, not as a list of discrete answers to the required questions.
No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Extremely easy to read.
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting and/or only adequately coherent with the introduction. The content is appears to just be a list of answering questions, instead of supporting and flowing logically with references.
A few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Relatively easy to read.
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
Many grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. Challenging to read. Not well organized.
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
Significant grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Very difficult to read. Disorganized.
