7. What should be done with the overall item? Revise, reuse as is, or discard? Explain your reasoning.
|
APA Formatting Grammar and Spelling |
No errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, APA formatting, and punctuation. (5 points) Ex: 0-1 error |
Two or three errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, APA formatting, and punctuation. (3 – 4 points) Ex: 2-3 errors |
Four or five errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, APA formatting, and punctuation. (1 – 2 points) Ex: 4-5 errors |
Greater than 5 errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, APA formatting, and punctuation. (0 points) Ex: greater than 5 errors |
Week Six Assignment(s)
There are no assignments due this week. Continue your work on your upcoming assignments.
Please refer to Week 6 topical outline for discussion forum requirements and upcoming assignments.
Week Seven Assignment(s)
Assignment and Grading Rubric
Directions:
Review the following student sample unit learning outcomes and topical outline for an ADN level Advanced Medical Surgical course.
Advanced Medical-Surgical Unit Outcomes
1. Determine safe patient-centered nursing care using evidence-based practice for patients experiencing complex alterations in health.
2. Identify development principles, prevention, and/or early detection of health problems and strategies to achieve the optimal health for adult and older adult patient experiencing complex alterations in health.
3. Examine caring and professional behaviors required when providing nursing care for patients experiencing complex alterations in health.
4. Examine effective verbal, nonverbal, written, and electronic communication required for the care of patients experiencing complex alterations in health.
5. Determine established practice standards and guidelines to ensure quality outcomes for patients experiencing complex alterations in health.
6. Determine collaborative relationships needed to provide and improve care for patients experiencing complex alterations in health.
Advanced Medical-Surgical Topic Outline
Respiratory
Pulmonary Embolism
Acute Respiratory Failure
Acute Respiratory Distress (Non-Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema)
Chest trauma
Mechanical ventilation
Cardiac
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Cardiac Tamponade
Cardiac Dysrhythmias
Pulmonary Edema
Valvular Heart disease
Cardiomyopathy
Hemodynamic monitoring
Endocarditis/Pericarditis
Neurology
Traumatic Brain Injury
Increased Intracranial Pressure
Meningitis
Encephalitis
Spinal Cord Injury
Assignment Directions:
A. Design a learning experience or assignment to assess at least one of the above stated unit learning outcomes. Include the following in your assignment:
1. Clearly describe the learning experience/assignment and detailed student instructions. Include any student groupings and identify the type of learning environment applicable for the assignment (theory, online, lab, clinical, etc.).
2. Include the specific learning outcomes to be assessed by the assignment and explain how the learning experience/assignment will assess or reinforce these outcomes.
3. Describe the assignment scoring and how the score will be used in determining one’s grade or pass/fail outcome.
B. Utilize information provided in the online lecture and from your readings to develop a grading rubric that will help insure consistency in grading the assignment you designed. Include the following in your rubric:
1. Identify criteria or various categories to be evaluated.
i. For example, criteria for a threaded discussion grading rubric include number of responses, nature of responses, grammar, punctuation, organization, etc.
2. Identify descriptors or characteristics to be noted.
i. For example, descriptors of a threaded discussion grading rubric for
organization include (a) thoughts are clearly organized and communicated effectively and (b) thoughts are poorly organized.
3. Indicate rating scale and point value for each characteristic identified in the rubric. 4. Includes several levels of achievement.
|
Rubric – Assignment and Grading Rubric |
||||
|
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL |
||||
|
Criteria |
Exceptional |
Effective |
Developing |
Unacceptable |
Introduction At least one paragraph
that
thoroughly
explains to
the reader
what is
At least one paragraph
that
adequately explains to the reader what is presented in
Less than one paragraph
and/or only adequately explains to the reader what is presented in
Student does not include introduction paragraph.
(0 points)
presented in the
assignment. (10 points)
the
assignment. (8 points)
the
assignment. (5 points)
|
Assignment 1. Clearly describe the learning experience/assignmentand detailed student instructions. 2. Include any student groupings and identify the type of learning environment applicablefor the assignment. 3. Include the specific learning outcomes to be assessed by the assignment and explain how the learning experience/assignmentwill assess or reinforce these outcomes. 4. Describe the assignment scoring and how the score will be used in determining one’s grade or pass/fail outcome. |
The presentation meets and adequately addresses all criteria (see criteria column). (5 points)
|
The presentation meets and adequately addresses all criteria (see criteria column). (3 points) |
The presentation meets and adequately addresses all criteria (see criteria column). (1 point) |
Does not sufficiently address criteria or addresses less than two of the criteria OR no assignment submitted. (0 points) |
Rubric
1. Identify criteria or
various categories to be evaluated.
2. Identify descriptors or characteristics to be
Thoroughly meets and addresses all 4 of the rubric criteria (see criteria
column).
Adequately meets and
addresses
only 3 of the 4 of the rubric criteria (see
Adequately meets and addresses
less than 2 of the 4 of the rubric criteria
Does not
adequately addresses any of rubric
requirements. (0 points)
noted.
3. Indicates rating scale and point value for
each characteristic
identified in the rubric.
4. Includes several levels of achievement.
(40 points) criteria column).
(30 points)
(see criteria column).
(20 points)
|
Grammar and Spelling |
No errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation. (5 points) Ex: 0-1 error |
Two or three errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation. (3 points) Ex: 2-3 errors |
Four or five errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation. (1 point) Ex: 4-5 errors |
Greater than 5 errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation. (0 points) Ex: greater than 5 errors |
APA Format Reference page contains
more than
required
scholarly
academic
references
within a five
year time
frame.
Follows APA
guidelines of
components:
double
space, 12 pt.
font, hanging
indent, type of
source
referenced.
Citations are
Reference
page contains required
number of
scholarly
sources within a five-year
time frame and text
reference.
Less than two APA guideline errors of
components: double space, 12 pt. font,
hanging
indent, type of source
referenced.
Reference
page contains less than
required
number of
scholarly
sources within a five-year
time frame and text
reference.
Greater than two APA
guideline
errors of
components: double space, 12 pt. font,
hanging
indent, type of
Reference
page contains no scholarly academic
resources, only internet web pages or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references
provided. No intext citations presented.
(0 points)
Ex: greater
than 5 errors
