Request a Quote, It's Free!!!                    

HRM 635 Performance Appraisals: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development

HRM 635 Performance Appraisals: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development

Performance Appraisals: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development

Organizations, including those in healthcare, leverage performance appraisal to evaluate employees’ overall performance and productivity based on prescribed or predefined standards and best practices. Performance appraisals inform employees about their work and identify areas for improvement in their behaviors and mindset in relation to work execution, and even professional development (Saks, 2022). The appraisal process creates work standards, job responsibilities, and constructive feedback for organizations and employees to improve in various aspects of their operations, conduct, and overall execution of their functions (Mohamed et al., 2025). This paper describes the evaluation of a mid-sized healthcare organization’s current system on performance appraisal and proposes changes. The paper also explores the alignment of the appraisal system and strategic goals in people development.

Performance Appraisal Assessment in Healthcare Organizations

Organizations, like the selected mid-sized healthcare facility, deploy performance appraisal assessments in managing employee performance in various ways. These include identifying workforce strengths and weaknesses, determining educational and training needs, and creating an effective compensation system. Homauni et al. (2021) observe through a systematic review that healthcare entities use performance appraisal assessments to develop robust performance analysis for employees and ensure they align with their professional development. Performance appraisal assessment helps the organization to provide feedback to its employees and foster professional development for long-term performance and sustainability. Again, Dolatabad et al. (2025) explore various performance appraisal methods in healthcare settings. The article asserts that effective appraisal supports decision-making and professional development. As such, the article recommends increased use of diverse appraisal tools based on organizational context and the need to meet diverse appraisal aspects for various employees, roles, and responsibilities.

The selected healthcare facility deploys a hybrid approach to performance appraisal assessment, which entails using a combination of assessment methods based on their qualitative and quantitative components. Quantitative components comprise measurable aspects like shift completion rates, error rates, project completion rates, and the number of patients under one’s care (Saks, 2022). Qualitative aspects are subjective factors like teamwork, leadership skills, innovative care approaches, and leveraging health data to make informed decisions, as well as communication skills. As such, the organization uses 360-degree feedback, management by objectives, and key performance indicators. For instance, key performance indicators (KPIs) show quantitative metrics to measure performance. These include patient satisfaction levels, rates of errors, and levels of adherence to protocols. The 360-degree method allows the organization to evaluate qualitative components like feedback from peers, supervisors, and patients about one’s performance (Mohamed et al., 2023). Management by objective (MBO) entails a collaborative effort in performance appraisal where managers and employees set clear, measurable, and SMART goals and assess performance based on progress to attain these goals. As such, MBO entails qualitative and quantitative components in performance appraisal for employees and the organization.

Communicating the performance appraisal practices is essential for employees to understand core metrics and outcomes. According to Faozen et al. (2023), performance management increases the productivity of employees, teams, and organizations through set goals. It also measures performance, provides feedback, and supports effective decision-making. Therefore, organizations must effectively and deliberately communicate performance appraisal approaches to employees to attain set goals. Consequently, the organization communicates these practices using training sessions, newsletters, and regular meetings and sessions within the facility. For instance, at the start of every appraisal period for the MBO tool, managers meet their team members to discuss and set performance goals and expected best practices.

Necessary Changes to Improve Performance Appraisal Processes in the Organization

The evaluation of the current performance appraisal processes in the organization demonstrates gaps that may hinder effective alignment of performance, organizational goals, and strategic professional development of the employees. As such, changes are necessary to ensure that the performance appraisal process is responsive to diverse employee and organizational needs. Firstly, the organization can adopt evidence-based practices like a continuous feedback model with regular check-ins, offer clear and aligned goals, and deploy objective and measurable criteria. Further, using multi-source or hybrid evaluations and assessments can also enhance performance appraisal processes for the healthcare entity.

Secondly, emphasis should be on objective evaluation, customization, and rater relevance to enhance performance outcomes. In their paper, Homauni et al. (2021) emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to performance appraisal processes to attain objective evaluation and provide appropriate feedback. Therefore, the organization can improve the performance appraisal processes by adopting a holistic approach that integrates traditional methods like 360-degree feedback and modern approaches that include continuous performance monitoring and competency-based appraisals in evaluating staff performance. For instance, peer reviews lead to customization and qualitative analysis of the performance, while the competency-based method ensures that employees have the competencies required to execute their roles and responsibilities.

Proposed Performance Appraisal Tool and Interview Approach

As a healthcare entity, the organization can benefit from various performance appraisal tools as they provide benefits to all stakeholders, both employees and management. An appropriate performance appraisal tool that the organization can use is competency-based appraisals. Competency-based performance appraisals evaluate specific skills, knowledge, and behaviors by healthcare employees that are essential for the execution of their roles and not just outcomes. Putra (2021) observes that competency-based appraisals ensure accurate and effective employee evaluation since they determine gaps in skills and other aspects that influence individual performance, especially care delivery. Further, Bindels et al. (2021) emphasize the significance of deploying appropriate tools that enable two-way communication and dialogue in performance appraisal processes. As such, the suggested tool ensures employers and employees align their professional development goals and performance requirements within their respective organizations.

An effective method to conduct appraisal interviews for healthcare employees is a structured dialogue based on SMART goal setting and deploying an appropriate appraisal method like 360-degree feedback. The interview method should foster continuous feedback using objective metrics and self-assessment to be balanced, constructive, and through a safe and supportive environment (Dolatabad et al., 2025). The structured dialogue should embrace active engagement of the employee and seek peer feedback based on a two-way communication model. Through this approach, the organization and employee will align their goals that include professional development and meeting set performance and productivity targets.

Recommendations for the Organization’s Leadership

Organizational leaders should develop performance appraisal measures to meet appraisal expectations of fairness and be practical to enhance professional development and motivate employees. Firstly, the organization should implement personalized appraisal plans for each employee, based on their dynamic strengths and areas of improvement. The approach leads to increased job satisfaction and motivation, including better retention of resources. For instance, competency-based appraisals evaluate specific skills, knowledge, and behaviors that align with best practices and standards based on an employee’s role. Such appraisal methods require customization and dealing with specific employees (Mohamed et al., 2023). Secondly, leaders should continuously implement performance management initiatives to get the latest feedback and foster a culture of ongoing development and change. The implication is that leaders should support appropriate performance appraisal methods based on their organizational needs and employees’ development plans.

Conclusion

Performance appraisal processes are essential for healthcare organizations and providers to evaluate their abilities to meet and align with expected performance goals. The evaluation of the current organization’s performance appraisal processes demonstrates a hybrid approach where it deploys both traditional and modern appraisal tools that offer immense benefits. However, the report proposes changes that would benefit the organization and recommends effective measures to meet appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criteria for professional development while motivating employees.

References

Bindels, E., Boerebach, B., Scheepers, R., Nooteboom, A., Scherpbier, A., Heeneman, S., &

Lombarts, K. (2021). Designing a system for performance appraisal: balancing

physicians’ accountability and professional development. BMC Health Services Research,

21(1): 800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06818-1

Dolatabad, M. A., Tehrani, P. N., Pourasghari, H., & Sharfafchizadeh, N. (2025). Employee

Performance Appraisal Methods: A Scoping Review.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.02.25330701

Faozen, F., & Sandy, S. R. O. (2024). Performance management: A new approach in

Performance management. In Human Resource Management: An Update. IntechOpen.

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1002501

Homauni, A., Mosadeghrad, A. M., & Jaafaripooyan, E. (2021). Employee performance

appraisal in health care organizations: A systematic review search. Journal of

Organizational Behavior Research, 6(2-2021): 109-121. DOI:10.51847/ZmP2aP2UUs

Mohamed, A. S., Awad Shetaway, G., Mohamed, A. A., M., Aboelenein, A. S., &

Mohamed, R. N. (2023). Nurses’ performance appraisal system and its association with their

empowerment and job satisfaction. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 14(4): 1124-1135.

DOI:10.21608/ejhc.2023.339077

Putra, A. R. (2021). Implementation of the Competency-Based Performance Appraisal System to

Ensure Accuracy and Effectiveness of Employee Evaluation. Journal of Social Science

Studies, 1(1): 59-66. https://jos3journals.id/index.php/jos3/article/view/31

Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human

resource management review, 32(3): 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835

Van Elten, H. J., & van der Kolk, B. (2024). Performance management, metric quality, and trust:

Survey evidence from healthcare organizations. The British Accounting Review,

  1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101511

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

With approval by your instructor, select a mid-sized to large organization and consider its performance management processes.

As a consultant, you have been asked to evaluate the current system and propose changes. In 1,000-1,250 words, address the following:

  1. Explain (a) How the organization uses the performance appraisal assessment to manage employee performance, (b) What is the organization’s current performance appraisal tool and its quantitative and qualitative components, and (c) How the organization has communicated and implemented its practices. Include at least one example of current practices for support.
  2. Determine what changes are necessary to improve the performance appraisal processes, including at least one example of the change for support.
  3. Consider a new performance appraisal tool that would benefit this company and an effective method for conducting a performance appraisal interview. Describe the benefits of using this proposed appraisal tool and appraisal interview during the performance evaluation process.
  4. Suggest a minimum of two recommendations for consideration by the company’s leadership that would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criteria for professional development and motivation of the employees.

Cite and reference a minimum of five scholarly sources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for low visionOpen the accessibility menu

Performance Appraisals: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Current Appraisal Methods

Description in paper includes appraisal method covering required elements and examples.

0 points

The description does not include the current appraisal method.

17.76 points

The description includes the current appraisal method but it is incomplete or lacks details.

18.96 points

The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.

20.88 points

The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices.

24 points

The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices.

Changes or Strategies

Description in paper includes changes or strategies for the company to implement for its performance appraisal practices, including examples.

0 points

The description does not include changes or strategies for the company.

22.2 points

The description includes some changes or strategies for the company but they are incomplete or lack details.

23.7 points

The description includes changes or strategies for the company to implement for its performance appraisal practices.

26.1 points

The description includes detailed changes or strategies for the company to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.

30 points

The description includes detailed and innovative changes or strategies for the company to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.

Appraisal Tool and Appraisal Interview

Description in paper includes suggestions for and a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages benefits from both the proposed appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method, and how it would align with the performance appraisal practices of the organization.

0 points

The description does not include appraisal tools or an appraisal interview method.

13.32 points

The description includes either the appraisal tool or the appraisal interview method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.

14.22 points

The description includes mention of both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.

15.66 points

The description includes detailed suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.

18 points

The description includes thorough suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization. In addition, the description addresses the benefit of using the appraisal tool and interview method as a part of the performance appraisal practice.

Recommendations to Company Leadership

Paper includes two or more recommendations to company leadership that would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criterion, and professional development and motivation of the employees.

0 points

There are no recommendations to company leadership.

8.88 points

Two or more recommendations to company leadership are made but the recommendations are incomplete or irrelevant.

9.48 points

Two or more recommendations to company leadership are made that would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criterion, and professional development and motivation of the employees.

10.44 points

Two or more appropriate recommendations to company leadership are made that would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criterion, and professional development and motivation of the employees.

12 points

Two or more exemplary recommendations to company leadership are made that would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criterion, and professional development and motivation of the employees.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

6.22 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

6.64 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

7.31 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

8.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

7.1 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

7.58 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

8.35 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

9.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

4.44 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

4.74 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

5.22 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

6 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

4.44 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

4.74 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

5.22 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

4.44 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

4.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

5.22 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

 


WhatsApp
Don`t copy text!