Dental Hygiene Theory 2 – PICO Assignment

[Type text][Type text][Type text]

Category

Exceeds Standard

Meets Standard

Nearly Meets Standard

Does Not Meet Standard

Score

Title Page

Title

Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished no-errors (5 marks)

Evidence of 4 (4 marks)

Evidence of 3 (2-3 marks)

Evidence of 2 or less

(0-1 marks)

PICO Question

Defined a focused and unique health/dental hygiene question.

(5 marks)

Defined an interesting and important health/dental hygi4ene question. (4 marks)

A focused health/dental hygiene question is defined

(2-3 Marks)

A health/dental hygiene question is apparent although it may not be clearly defined or focused

(0-1 marks)

Key Words & Search Strategies

Evidence that search strategies were broad in scope and depth

(5 marks)

-Evidence that search strategies were comprehensive (4 marks)

-Search strategies appear relevant and focused (2-3 marks)

-Search strategies produced basic results (0-1 marks)

Introduction

-Rationale for question/topic is insightful and succinct (5 marks)

-Rationale for question is relevant and interesting (4 marks)

-Rationale for question is supported by logic and evidence; identifies key relationships between ideas (2-3 marks)

-Rationale for question is supported by relevant literature (0-1 marks)

Literature Review

-Synthesizes the current literature and research related to the question

-Discusses gaps in the literature

-Content is organized, logical, concise, and communicated in a professional manner (10 marks)

-Summarizes current literature and research related to the question

-Identifies gaps in the literature

-Content is organized, logical and communicated in a professional manner (8-9 marks)

-Summarizes current literature and research related to the question

-Gaps in the literature sometimes identified

-Content needs refinement in organization, clarity, and/or professional communication (5-7 marks)

-Current literature is summarized.

-No discussion in critiquing articles

-Content is organized but lacks clarity (0-4 marks)

Conclusion

-The writing is persuasive and articulate

-Provides a succinct summary of complex ideas

-Writing style is geared to professional audience (5 marks)

-The writing is generally well organized and logical in flow

-Uses a fluid style that informs and convinces

-Provides an articulate summary of key ideas

-Uses professional language and conventions in a proficient manner

(4 marks)

-Most information presented in a logical sequence, more transitions would support clarity

-Generally draws clear relationships between ideas

-Supports ideas with citations of literature

-Begins to use a fluid style that informs and convinces

-Shows evidence of coherence and clarity

-Provides a summary of key issues

-Uses professional language

(2-3 marks)

-Concepts and ideas are sometimes loosely connected; lacks clear transitions

(0-1 marks)

Citation

-Resources are extensive relevant and credible

(5 marks)

-Resources are comprehensive relevant and credible (4 marks)

-Resources are relevant, diverse and credible (2-3 marks)

-Resources tend to come from less credible sources or secondary sources

(0-1 marks)

Name: Score: 0/40 (0%) or 0 out of 15

The post Dental Hygiene Theory 2 – PICO Assignment [Type text][Type text][Type text] Category appeared first on PapersSpot.