NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidencebased practice

NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
based practice – Assessment 2
Marking Algorithm
1 of 7

  1. TITLE and OVERVIEW slides (2 Marks)
    You can score up to 2 marks if the presentation has a title slide and a clear overview slide of the
    presentation (2 slides). You must choose one of the following titles:
  2. Emergency management of adult smoke inhalation injuries
  3. Acute management of major thermal burns in adults
  4. ICU management of adult patients with severe head injury
  5. Acute management of drowning in paediatric patients
  6. Acute management of lower limb fracture in adults
    Is the title slide one of the 5 titles provided above?  NO 
    Stop
    marking the
    whole
    assessment

    YES

    Does the overview slide have an accurate and chronological
    framework/overview of presentation?
     NO  1 Marks

    YES

    2 Marks
    NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
    based practice – Assessment 2
    Marking Algorithm
    2 of 7
  7. AIM/S OF THE PRESENTATION (3 Marks)
    You can score up to 3 marks if in your own words you explain the aim/s of your presentation. What
    do you want the audience take away from this presentation? (1 slide).
    Is there an aim slide?  NO  0 Marks

    YES

    Is the aim explained and provide a basic understanding of what the
    purpose of the presentation is?  NO  1 Marks

    YES

    Is the aim of the presentation clearly explained at an advanced
    level for a 3rd year nursing student?
     NO  2 Marks

    YES

    3 Marks
    NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
    based practice – Assessment 2
    Marking Algorithm
    3 of 7
  8. BACKGROUND (10 Marks)
    You can score up to 10 marks if the presentation has a background that sets the context of your
    presentation. A background should provide information about the topic, such as definition of the
    condition and causes. A brief summary of the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and why the topic is
    important and relevant for nursing practice. Please have in-text referencing in the bottom of the slides
    and if the reference has more than two authors use et al. (Approximately 2 slides).
    Is there a background provided in this presentation?  NO  0 Marks

    YES

    Is there a definition with pathophysiology and epidemiology of the
    condition?  NO  1-3 Marks

    YES

    Does the background discuss in enough detail the causes/risk
    factors/mechanism of injury (MOI) of the underlying condition and
    the pathophysiology?
     NO  4-6 Marks

    YES

    Does this section provide high quality information?
    Does it relate to the audience why the topic is important and
    relevant for nursing practice?
    Is there a minimum of 4 relevant and current references?
     NO  7-9 Marks

    YES

    10 marks
    NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
    based practice – Assessment 2
    Marking Algorithm
    4 of 7
  9. ASSESSMENT (12 Marks)
    You can score up to 12 marks if the presentation provides a detailed explanation on how patient
    assessment is conducted and aligns with the topic chosen. (Approximately 2 slides).
    Are there assessment slides  NO  0 Marks

    YES

    Does the patient assessment discuss in basic detail how the
    assessment is conducted? Does the patient assessment align with
    the topic chosen?
     NO  1-3 Marks

    YES

    Does the patient assessment discuss in moderate detail how the
    assessment is conducted? It is clear what nurses you would be
    looking for and looking at, feeling for and listening for during the
    assessment.
     NO  4-6 Marks

    YES

    Does the patient assessment discuss with outstanding detail how
    the assessment is conducted? The deviation from the normal is
    noted
     NO  7-9 Marks

    YES

    12 Marks
    NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
    based practice – Assessment 2
    Marking Algorithm
    5 of 7
  10. INTERVENTIONS (6 Marks)
    You can score up to 6 marks if the presentation provides six priority interventions. Please combine the
    interventions and rationales together on table.
    Have any appropriate interventions been presented?  NO  0 Marks

    YES

    Are all the 6 interventions aligned with the condition and a
    priority?
     NO  1-3 Marks

    YES

    Are all 6 of the interventions identified with outstanding detail?
    The interventions and are detailed in what exactly needs to be
    done, when, and how this will be done.
     NO  4-5 Marks

    YES

    6 Marks
    NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
    based practice – Assessment 2
    Marking Algorithm
    6 of 7
  11. RATIONALE OF THE INTERVENTIONS (10 Marks)
    You can score up to 10 marks if the presentation discusses the rationales for the planned interventions
    with supporting literature. Explain the pathophysiology behind why the interventions are needed.
    How the interventions may improve patient’s survival and outcomes. Please note that for in-text
    referencing, if the reference has more than two authors use et al.
    Are there rationales provided?  NO  0 Marks

    YES

    Do most of the rationales correctly align with the interventions,
    with support from scientific literature?
     NO  1-3 Marks

    YES

    Do the rationales provide good explanation to why the
    interventions may improve patient’s condition?  NO  4-6 Marks

    YES

    Is there an outstanding explanation of the link between the
    interventions and the rationales? Are the rationales supported by
    the evidenced based literature?
     NO  7-9 Marks

    YES

    10 Marks
    NURS3101 (2019) In-service presentation of evidence
    based practice – Assessment 2
    Marking Algorithm
    7 of 7
  12. QUALITY OF THE PRESENTATION (7 Marks)
    You can score up to 7 marks if the presentation meets the following criteria. A good presentation
    includes confidence, passion, knowledge, naturalness, organization, time sensitivity and clarity.
    Overall presentation understandable and interesting and
    disseminated information clearly?  NO  0 Marks

    YES

    Mostly dot points and tables were used and the voice over
    expanded upon each point throughout?  NO  1-3 Marks

    YES

    Has the clarity and quality of the voice recording been consistently
    maintained and the slides were visually appealing throughout the
    whole presentation?
     NO  4-5 Marks

    YES

    The presentation has the key factors of a quality presentation and
    demonstrates professionalism worthy of presenting to your peers.
    Time adhered to as 15 minutes maximum. Are the in-text APA
    referencing and reference list appropriately used?
     NO  6 Marks

    Yes

    7 Marks
Reference no: EM132069492

GET HELP WITH YOUR PAPERS

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments? We are here