HEA505- Assessment 2 Rubric- Written Assessment (Word Count 2000 words) Criteria (40 points in total)High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailCritical analysis (20 points)Critical analysis and discussionof key issues related to topic.Establishment of therelationship of facilitation tothe learning needs of thecohort using practicalexamples.17-20Demonstrates excellence inability to interpret and addressthe topic, including a criticalperspective that shows depthof critique and analysis.Excellent establishment … Continue reading “HEA505- Assessment 2 Rubric | My Assignment Tutor”
HEA505- Assessment 2 Rubric- Written Assessment (Word Count 2000 words) Criteria (40 points in total)High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailCritical analysis (20 points)Critical analysis and discussionof key issues related to topic.Establishment of therelationship of facilitation tothe learning needs of thecohort using practicalexamples.17-20Demonstrates excellence inability to interpret and addressthe topic, including a criticalperspective that shows depthof critique and analysis.Excellent establishment of therelationship of facilitation tothe learning needs of thecohort using practicalexamples.15-16Demonstrates proficiency ininterpreting and addressingthe topic. Including superiorcritique and analysis.Superior establishment of therelationship of facilitation tothe learning needs of thecohort using practicalexamples.13-14Demonstrates competence ininterpreting and addressingthe topic. Some evidence ofanalysis and critique.Good establishment of therelationship of facilitation tothe learning needs of thecohort using practicalexamples.10-12Satisfactory evidence of abilityto interpret and address thetopic. Mostly descriptive withlimited explanation orexamples to illustrate orsupport points made.Satisfactory establishment ofthe relationship of facilitationto the learning needs of thecohort using practicalexamples.Less than 10Understanding of the topic ispoor. Few or no explanationsor examples to illustrate orsupport points made.Relationship of facilitation tothe learning needs of thecohort not established/ nopractical examples used.Using the literature effectively(10 points)Ability to search for and selectmaterial appropriate to thetopic. Integrates ideas,information from appropriateresources; makes connectionsacross selected sources thataddress the assignment task;effective paraphrasing.9-10Insightful, well consideredcomprehension of texts,resources and readings withinsightful connections acrossselected resources and thelisted assignment task.Excellence in ability toparaphrase with minimal useof direct quotes.8Proficient comprehension oftexts, resources and readingswith very good connectionsacross selected resources andthe listed assignment task.Proficiency in paraphrasing.7Good comprehension of texts,resources and readings. Goodconnections across selectedresources and the listedcriteria in relation to theassignment task. Evidence ofparaphrasing.5-6Satisfactory comprehension oftexts, resources and readings.Some connections acrossselected resources and thelisted criteria in relation to theassignment task. Reliance onquotations used rather thaninterpreting meaning throughparaphrasing.Less than 5Little or no use of orengagement with texts,resources and readings.Sources not relevant orpertinent to the topic and thelisted criteria in relation to theassignment task. Numerousquotations rather thaninterpreting meaning throughparaphrasing.Academic Literacy (10 points)Structure, logical sequencing& flow of informationClear direction for the readerthrough a clearly identifiableintroduction, body andconclusion; use of effectiveparagraphing.Written expressionAbility to express ideasclearly. Quality of grammar,spelling, punctuation andsyntax (sentence structure).ReferencingAttention to referencing andacknowledgement of othersources, both in-text and inthe reference list.9-10Provides excellent direction forthe reader including excellentstructure with logicalsequencing and flow ofinformation.Excellence demonstrated inexpression of ideas. Excellentattention to correct spelling,grammar, punctuation andsyntax.Exemplary referencing andcitation. All conventionsfollowed. Using CDU APA 7threferencing style with anoccasional minor error in thein-text citation and/orreference list.8Provides clear direction for thereader including clearstructure with logicalsequencing and flow ofinformation.Written expression is clear,able to express ideas readily.Consistent attention to correctspelling, grammar,punctuation, and syntax.Superior referencing, includingcitation conventions. Uses CDUAPA 7th referencing style withseveral minor errors in the intext citation and/or referencelist.7Generally competent directionfor the reader with goodattention to structure andlogical sequencing and flow ofinformation.Written expression and clarityof ideas is generally good.Spelling, grammar,punctuation and syntax mayneed more consistency.Competent referencing,including citation conventions.Uses CDU APA 7th referencingstyle with many minor errorsor one significant error in thein-text citation and/orreference list.5-6Satisfactory direction for thereader. Satisfactory structureand logical sequencing andflow of information.Satisfactory written expressionwith some ability to expressideas clearly. Satisfactoryspelling, grammar,punctuation and syntax.Satisfactory referencing,including citation conventions.Uses CDU APA 7th referencingstyle with more than onesignificant error in the in-textcitation and/or reference list.Less than 5Little or no direction providedfor the reader. Poor attentionto structure and logicalsequencing and flow ofinformation.Limited written expressionthat lacks clarity of ideas.Frequently incorrect spelling,grammar, punctuation andsyntax.Poor attention to referencingand citation conventionsoverall. Uses referencing styleother than CDU APA 7th in thein-text citation and/orreference list.
