SOLUTION: NURS2011 Quality & Safety in Health Care | My Assignment Tutor

ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS & MARKING GUIDE Topic Code & Name:NURS2011 Quality & Safety in Health CareAssessmentAssignment 2: Individual Poster: (1200 words +/- 10%)Assessment Description:Poster PresentationThis assignment requires you to create a poster (using one of the templates provided or bydesigning a poster yourself) addressing a primary health care program that aims to address a keyhealth priority either locally, nationally or globally.You are expected to read a wide range of peer reviewed journal articles to support informationcontained in your poster and this assignment requires you to present this evidence throughout yourposter. A POSTER IS NOT AN ESSAY. Please check the criteria for a poster. Look on the web forexamples of posters.Points that you need to address: (you do not need to use these exact headings and you areencouraged to be creative but ensure that all areas are addressed)• Title: Chose a catchy title to draw readers to your poster and to clearly explain what yourfocus is for the poster.• Author and ID• Flinders University Logo• Introduction – Introduce the poster and area of discussion.• Health priority – Discuss the health priority that you are addressing utilising health data toemphasise the impact of the priority on the health of the population or the reason for itbeing seen as a priority.• Primary Health Program – Introduce and discuss a health care program that currently existsto address your chosen health priority.• Discussion regarding the Social Determinants that impact the health priority – This can beone or more of the social, cultural, political, or economic determinants of health that mightimpact on the priority or health program, either as a contributing factor or as a key focus ofthe primary health program. This can be discussed in terms of how the program does NOTaddress the social determinants of health.• Limitations of the program – Analysis of how the program could be improved to betteraddress the health priority and the SDoHHealth Priority Information:• This can be a local, national or global health priority. You can select this priority from:o the National Health Priority Areas (NHPA) – see Improving Australia’s Burden ofDisease oro the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions.o The World Health Organisation Health Prioritieso a priority not listed above, providing you can justify it based on its burden on thehealth of a population. Ie. You might like to focus on a specific priority for a localarea such as Acute Rheumatic Fever or Trachoma in Remote Aboriginalcommunities, or Youth Mental health in the context of COViD-19, or Lead levels inchildren in Pt Pirie etc.• If you are unclear if your topic is appropriate or are struggling to choose a topic, pleasespeak to or email your tutor.• If you chose not to use one of the templates provided, please ensure your poster is Size A0or 1189 x 841 mm• Remember to reference as per the normal university policy- APA style both intext andcitations inthe reference list.• All images have to be referenced as to their source so don’t forget to reference any imagesusedand make sure there is no copyright infringement and image is for public use. Resources to supportyour assignment:There are many different Primary Health Programs targeting local, national and global healthpriorities. Consider an area you are interested in and do some searching to see what is out there.It can be a government funded program or a non-government organisation.Some examples of Primary Health Care programs can be found on the following websites:Adelaide Primary Health Network Directory of Services and ProgramsAustralian Department of Health -Initiative and ProgramsAustralian Department of Health – Mental health and suicide preventionAustralian Department of Health -Health PromotionSA Health – Preventative health and wellbeingSA Health – Campaigns and ProjectsNSW Government – Annotated list of health promotion initiativesVic Health – Programs & ProjectsCRITERIA FOR A POSTERA poster is meant to be eye catching, easy to read and has the aim of portraying importantinformation in a concise format. Consider the poster is for educating others around an area ofpractice.A POSTER IS NOT AN ESSAY.• A poster emphasises the main points and can use pictures and diagrams to help get across amessage.• Introduction and conclusion sections convey relevant information• Poster draws attention to key points• Information in text is clear and concise• Information in illustrations is clear, concise and relevant• Important messages are clear to viewers• The use of dot points and numbering is acceptable• Headings signpost the flow of ideas• Clear and natural sequence to ideas in poster• Overloading of poster is avoided• Balance is achieved between text and illustrations, pictures, diagrams and graphs• Poster is understandable without supporting verbal explanation by author• Adherence to dimensions and quality• Title of poster and details of author and affiliations clear• Appropriate and imaginative use of colour, borders, illustrations and use of space• Tables, graphs, graphics or photographs are of sufficient clarity/resolution/size and relevant• Appropriate size and font style for text and captions• Abbreviations minimised and in full text before initial use• Correct punctuation, spelling and grammar throughout; absence of errors• Correct and consistent citation style throughout poster• Reference list correct and consistent incorporating all reviewed articles and sources. Performance standardAssessmentcriteriaWeightHigh DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailIntroduction5%Clearly and concisely introducesthe poster and the topic underdiscussion to engage the readerClearly introduces the posterand the topic underdiscussion.Introduces the poster andthe topic under discussionSome introduction to thetopic, although not clearand not engaging to thereader.No or confusingintroduction to the topic orthe posterDescribe a local,national or globalHealth Priority15%Outline of health priority isthorough, succinct, and highlyrelevant to this assessment.Innovative and criticalperspective shown withdemonstrated deepunderstanding of the impact ofthe health priority on thepopulation.Clear and engaging justificationof the priority utilising healthdata and research evidence.Outline of health priority isthorough, succinct, andrelevant to thisassessment.Critical perspective shownwith demonstratedunderstanding of theimpact of the healthpriority on the population.Clear justification ofthe priority utiliseshealth data andresearch evidence.Outline of health priority isrelevant to thisassessment.Demonstratedunderstanding of theimpact of the healthpriority on the populationwith some integration ofthe health data andresearch evidence.Identification of the healthpriority and the populationit effects.Some attempt to integratehealth data and researchevidenceHealth priority notidentified or unclear.Population affected notrecognised. No use ofhealth data or researchevidence.Description ofPrimary Health CareProgram10%Clear and engaging descriptionof the primary health programwith exceptional integration of awide range of evidence.Clear analysis anddiscussion ofthe PrimaryHealth Program withintegration of a wide rangeof evidence.Analysis and discussion ofthe Primary HealthProgram with integrationof evidence.Discussion ofthe PrimaryHealth Program with someattempt at integration ofevidence.Description of healthprogram only. No analysisor discussion.No integration of evidence.Discussion30%Exemplary and creative analysisand discussion of the impact ofthe Primary Health ProgramExceptional, critical discussion ofhow the social determinants ofhealth impact on the healthpriority and health program.Limitations or strengths of theHealth Program are welldescribed and insightful.Clear and well-presented linksbetween SDoH and thepopulations under discussion.Creative analysis anddiscussion of the impact ofthe Primary HealthProgram.Critical discussion of howthe social determinants ofhealth impact on thehealth priority and healthprogram.Limitations or strengths ofthe Health Program arewell described.Clear links between SDoHand the populations underdiscussion.Analysis and discussion ofthe impact of the PrimaryHealth Program.Clear discussion of how thesocial determinants ofhealth impact on thehealth priority and healthprogram.Limitations or strengths ofthe Health Program aredescribed.Links between SDoH andthe populations underdiscussion. .Discussion of the impact ofthe Primary HealthProgram.Some discussion of howthe social determinants ofhealth impact on thehealth priority and healthprogram.Some limitations orstrengths of the HealthProgram are discussed.Some links between SDoHand the populations underdiscussion. .No discussion of the impactof the Primary HealthProgram.No discussion of how thesocial determinants ofhealth impact on thehealth priority and healthprogram.No limitations or strengthsof the Health Program areidentified.No links between SDoH andthe populations underdiscussion. . Performance standardAssessmentcriteriaWeightHigh DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailStructure andWriting Style20%Very well-structured with allcomponents present as outlinedin assessment details.Systematically and logicallyorganised.Flawless grammar, spelling andsentence structure.Creative and engagingpresentation of ideasClear structure whichenhances the discussionand argumentSystematically and logicallyorganised Excellentgrammar, spelling andsentence structureEngaging presentation ofideasGenerally well-structuredwith all componentspresent as outlined inassessment details.Evidence of systematicorganisation of content.Minimal errors in spelling,grammar, or syntax so thepaper is easy to read.Adequately structured asoutlined in assessmentdetails but one or twocomponents need furtherdevelopment.Structures may make itdifficult to read, but itadequately communicatesinformation.Problems evident withgrammar, spelling, andsentence structure but thepaper is mostly easy to readInadequate structure asoutlined in assessmentdetails with poororganisation of components.No clear flow, rambling,repetitive, difficult to readand to understand themeaning. Includessignificant errors in spelling,grammar, and syntax, so theintent of the paper isdifficult to determine.Use of evidence andreferencing20%Located, evaluated, andsynthesised highly relevantinformation from quality peerreviewed, relevant, and currentevidence sources. Accuratelyand consistently adhered to APA(6th) referencing conventions inboth in text referencing and thereference list with no errorsLocated, evaluated, andsynthesised relevantinformation from peerreviewed, relevant, andcurrent evidence sources.Clear evidence of wide andrelevant reading.Accurately adhered to APA(6th) referencingconventions in both in textreferencing and thereference list.Located, evaluated, andincorporated a range ofquality peer reviewed,relevant, and currentevidence sources. Almostalways accurately andconsistently adhered toAPA (6th) referencingconventions in both in textreferencing and thereference list.Located and collated partlyrelevant information fromthe topic and currentevidence sources.Attempt made to adhere toAPA (6th) referencingconventions in both in textreferencing and thereference list, but somereferencing omissions orinaccuracies noted.Substantial lack andInadequate use of qualitypeer reviewed, relevant,and current evidencesources.Frequent errors in APA(6th) referencing style forreference list and in textreferencingStudents Name:Click or tap here to enter text.Marker Name and Email:Click or tap here to enter text.Comments:Grade: Choose an item.