SOLUTION: CCF501 Cloud Computing Fundamentals | My Assignment Tutor

CCF501_Assessment_2_Brief_Case Study Report_Module 8 Page 1 of 6 ASSESSMENT 02 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleCCF501 Cloud Computing FundamentalsAssessmentCase StudiesIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2400 words (+/-10%)Learning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the Subject LearningOutcomes outlined at the bottom of this document.SubmissionBy 11:55 pm AEST Sunday of Module 8Weighting30%Total Marks100 marks Context:This aim of this assessment is to determine the student’s capabilities to analyse the features cloudoffers, compare traditional IT services with Cloud Services and how different service models can beutilised to solve a challenge, using different public cloud providers.During this assessment, students will go through four case studies one each week and prepare areport of 2400 words (total).Instructions:Your facilitator will provide you with four scenarios. Please be advised that the following points weretaken into consideration during the scenario selection process: Each of the four scenarios presented are from different service and deployment models. They cater for different service sectors of cloud like web application, big data, IoT and/orArtificial Intelligence. Each uses a variety of services from providers. The scenarios are taken from popular public cloud providers.The assessment requires you to prepare a report based on the case studies provided by yourfaciliatator.CCF501_Assessment_2_Brief_Case Study Report_Module 8 Page 2 of 6Report Instructions:Start off with a short introduction (approximately 250 words) stating basic information relevant tothe report and introducing relevant points relating to the case studies. For example, you can providebackground information including some context related to cloud computing. This section will bewritten in complete sentences and paragraphs. No tables, graphs, diagrams or dot points should beincluded.The structure, main body of the report should comprise of four different sections 600 words each(one section for each case study) based on the above mentioned case studies. With each sectionspecifically addressing the following about the case study. Analysis of the case Analysing the service model for the case study including the services by the providerand each scenario utilised. Compare and contrast different deployment models for this scenario. Analyse the application of different services each case study used. ReflectionFinally, write a conclusion (approximately 250 words) as a summary of your analysis of the case. Thissection brings together all of the information that you have presented in your report and should linkto the purpose of the assessment as mentioned in the introduction. You can also discuss any areaswhich have been identified as requiring further investigation and how this will work to improve orchange our understanding of the topic. This section does not introduce or discuss any newinformation specifically, and like the introduction, will be written in complete sentences andparagraphs. No tables, graphs, diagrams or dot points should be included.Report writingLaureate academic skills unit (n.d.).Report Writing. Retrieved from https://laureateau.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498855_1&mode=resetReferencingAccess the following link to assist with correct referencing:It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see moreinformation on referencing hereLibrary (n.d.). Referencing. Retrieved from http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencingCCF501_Assessment_2_Brief_Case Study Report_Module 8 Page 3 of 6Submission Instructions:Due date: By 11:55 pm AEST Sunday of Module 8Submit your Report as a word document through the Assessment 2 submission link underAssessment found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. Your assessment willbe formally graded via the Grade Centre by your Learning Facilitator and feedback will be providedthrough My Grades.ICC501_Assessment_2_Brief_Case Study Report_Module 8 Page 4 of 6Learning Rubric: Assessment 2 Case Study Report AssessmentAttributesFail (Unacceptable)0-49%Pass(Functional)50-64%Credit(Proficient)65-74%Distinction(Advanced)75 -84%High Distinction(Exceptional)85-100%Content, Audienceand Purpose (broadand specific content)10%Demonstrates noawareness of contextand/or purpose of theassignment.Demonstrates partialawareness of contextand/or purpose of theassignmentDemonstrates consistentawareness of context and/orpurpose of the assignment.Demonstrates an advancedand integratedunderstanding of contextand/or purpose of theassignment.Consistently demonstrates asystematic and criticalunderstanding of contextand purpose of theassignment.Compare, contrastand validate differentcloud service modelsutilising services bymajor cloudproviders.40%Demonstrated limitedunderstanding of theservice models.Limited capability ofanalysis is demonstrated.Demonstrates theunderstanding of differentservice models but fails tocompare.Limited capability of analysisis demonstrated.Well-developed conceptualComparison of differentservice models employed indifferent scenarios, includingthe services they use.The analysis is to the pointnot very deep and coversmost of the aspects of theservices utilized during thecase.Thoroughly Compares andvalidates different servicemodels employed indifferent scenarios,including the services theyuse.The analysis is in depth andcovers nearly all the aspectsof the services utilizedduring the case.Sytematically Compares andvalidates different servicemodels employed indifferent scenarios,including the services theyuse.The analysis is in depth andcovers all the aspects of theservices utilized during thecase.Demonstrates aconceptualunderstanding ofcloud computingconcepts, essentialcharacteristics and itsapplication to resolvethe challenge in thestudy.Limited understanding ofkey concepts required tosupport the case study.Information is taken fromreliable sources butwithout a coherentanalysis or synthesis.Viewpoints of experts areResembles a recall orsummary of key ideas.Often conflates/confusespersonal opinion withevidence fromresearch/course materials.Analysis and evaluation donot reflect expertIdentifies/Support essentialcharacteristics and conceptssubstantiated by evidencefrom the research/coursematerials.Demonstrates a capacity toexplain and apply relevantconcepts.Discriminates betweenessential characteristics andconcepts substantiated byrobust evidence from theresearch/course materialsand extended reading.Well demonstrated capacityto explain and applyrelevant concepts.Systematically and criticallydiscriminates betweenessential characteristics andconcepts by robustevidence from theresearch/course materialsand extended reading.Information is taken fromsources with a high level of ICC501_Assessment_2_Brief_Case Study Report_Module 8 Page 5 of 6 20%taken as fact with littlequestioning.judgement, intellectualindependence, rigor andadaptability.Identify logical flaws.Questions viewpoints ofexperts.The viewpoint of experts issubject to questioning.Analysis and evaluationreflect growing judgement,intellectual independence,rigor and adaptability.interpretation/evaluation todevelop a comprehensivecritical analysis or synthesis.Identifies gaps inknowledge.Exhibits intellectualindependence, rigor, goodjudgement and adaptability.Compare andcontrast the Cloudinfrastructure andthe traditional ITinfrastructure.20%Demonstrate limitedskills/knowledge tocompare the two.Information is taken fromreliable sources butwithout a coherentanalysis or synthesis.Viewpoints of experts aretaken as fact with littlequestioning.Demonstrate a functionallevel of knowledge whilecomparing traditional ITservices with Cloud solutionin the Case Study.Often conflates/confusespersonal opinion withevidence fromresearch/course materials.Analysis and evaluation donot reflect expertjudgement, intellectualindependence, rigor andadaptability.Identifies/Support essentialcomparison criteria pointssubstantiated by evidencefrom the research/coursematerials.Demonstrates a capacity toexplain and apply relevantconcepts.Identify logical flaws.Questions viewpoints ofexperts.Demonstrates an advancelevel of comparison isprovided by the studentover a range of aspects andincluding future expansionand flexibility in thediscussion.Well demonstrated capacityto explain and applyrelevant concepts.The viewpoint of experts issubject to questioning.Analysis and evaluationreflect growing judgement,intellectual independence,rigor and adaptability.Expert level of comparisonis provided by the studentover a range of aspects andincluding future expansionand flexibility in thediscussion.Information is taken fromsources with a high level ofinterpretation/evaluation todevelop a comprehensivecritical analysis or synthesis.Identifies gaps inknowledge.Exhibits intellectualindependence, rigor, goodjudgement and adaptability.Correct citation ofkey resources andDemonstrates inconsistentuse of good quality,credible and relevantresources to support andDemonstrates some use ofcredible and relevantresources to support anddevelop ideas, but these areDemonstrates the use of highquality, credible and relevantresources to support anddevelop ideas.Demonstrates the use ofgood quality, credible andrelevant resources tosupport and developDemonstrates the use ofhigh-quality, credible andrelevant resources tosupport and develop ICC501_Assessment_2_Brief_Case Study Report_Module 8 Page 6 of 6 evidenceDemonstratesappropriate use andreferencing ofresources, includingcorrect in-text andreference listcomposition10%develop ideas.not always explicit or welldeveloped.arguments and statements.Shows evidence of widescope within theorganisation for sourcingevidencearguments and positionstatements. Shows evidenceof wide scope within andwithout the organisation forsourcing evidence The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessmentSLO a)Demonstrate an understanding of the fundamentals of Cloud Computing.SLO b)Compare and contrast the Cloud infrastructure and the traditional IT infrastructure.SLO d)Compare, contrast and validate different cloud service models utilising services by major cloud providers.