ASSESSMENT 2 – Clinical Case Scenario: NUR131 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailUnderstanding of application of contentResponse to questions40%The ideas presented areconsistently relevant andprovide a comprehensiveresponse to the question.Work shows originality and flairthrough use of examples givenand demonstrates excellentunderstanding of thecomponents of the questionThe ideas presented areconsistently relevant andprovide a comprehensiveresponse to the question.Work shows well-chosenexamples and … Continue reading “PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | My Assignment Tutor”
ASSESSMENT 2 – Clinical Case Scenario: NUR131 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailUnderstanding of application of contentResponse to questions40%The ideas presented areconsistently relevant andprovide a comprehensiveresponse to the question.Work shows originality and flairthrough use of examples givenand demonstrates excellentunderstanding of thecomponents of the questionThe ideas presented areconsistently relevant andprovide a comprehensiveresponse to the question.Work shows well-chosenexamples and demonstratesgood understanding of thecomponents of the question.The ideas presented aregenerally relevant and providean overall comprehensiveresponse to the question.Work shows a developingunderstanding with someexamples used to illustrate anunderstanding of somecomponents of the questionThe ideas presented arerelevant in parts, but thequestion is not fully covered.Work shows a limitedunderstanding with very fewexamples used to illustratean understanding of very fewcomponents of the questionThe ideas presented are notalways relevant and theresponse does not addressseveral aspects of the question.Work shows a lack ofunderstanding with little to noexamples used to illustrate anunderstanding of the questionResponse to reflection20%Articulates transformation oftheir perspective of themselvesor about anissue/concept/problem as aresult of experience.Clear discussion of model ofreflection and utilised all areasfor reflective practiceArticulates newunderstanding/insightsabout self orissue/concept/problem as aresult of experience.Model of reflectionhighlighted. Discussed allareas of the model ofreflectionLimited/superficial insightabout self orissue/concept/problem as aresult of experience.Model of reflectionhighlightedVery minimal evidence ofinsights about self orissue/concept/problem as aresult of experienceMainly Descriptive ratherthan reflective. Model ofreflection used but not clearon which oneNo evidence of insights aboutself or issue/concept/problem asa result of experience.Descriptive only. No model ofreflection usedDepth and breadth(critical thinking):Demonstrates engagementwith the literature, readingsand unit resources.Develops a critical andreflective approach to theprovision of effective, qualitycare.10%Evidence of a high leveldiscussion of the issues isreflected in consistent, creativeand in-depth presentation andanalysis of viewpoints (counterviews and/or qualifying points).Insightfully integratesliterature, reading and unitresources to demonstrate acomprehensive understandingof the taskEvidence of discussion of theissues is reflected in theconsistent and appropriatepresentation and analysis ofviewpoints (counter-viewsand/or qualifying points).Consistently integratesliterature, reading and unitresources to demonstrate adetailed understanding ofthe taskEvidence of critical analysis ofthe issues is reflected in thepresentation and analysis of anumber of appropriateviewpointsComprehends sound meaningof literature, reading and unitresource texts; someconnections across selectedresources and listed criteria inrelation to the assignmenttaskEvidence of critical analysisof the issues reflected in thepresentation of limitedviewpoints (counter-viewsand/or qualifying points).Limited comprehension ofliterature, reading and unitresources texts, resourcesand readings, and does notmake connections with thebigger picture. Studentattempts to demonstrate anunderstanding of the taskThere is little evidence of criticalanalysis of the issues throughthe presentation of differentviewpoints.Little or no comprehension ofliterature, reading and unitresource.Student does not demonstratean understanding of theapplication of task StructureStructure and Style15%The writing is sophisticated andshows variety and complexity.Work is the student’s originalcontribution and tone isconsistent and suitable for thepurpose and academicaudience.All academic conventionsadhered toThe writing shows varietyand complexity. Work is thestudent’s originalcontribution and tone isconsistent and suitable forthe purpose and academicaudienceThe writing shows variety andcomplexity that may beuneven. Work is the student’soriginal contribution and toneis usually appropriate for thepurpose and academicaudience.Academic convention adheredto with minimal errorsThe writing shows littlevariety and may be simplisticor rely on clichés. Some ofthe work demonstratesoriginality but passages oftext are inconsistent ofplagiarised. Tone may beinappropriate, not academicand have someinconsistencies in tense andpersonThe writing in general containssuperficial and stereotypicallanguage; inappropriate oral(informal) rather than writtenlanguage patterns predominate.The work is not original andextensive passages of the workare plagiarized and tonebecomes unsuitable andinconsistent.Incorrect/no academicconventions adhered toResearch and Referencing15%The ideas are comprehensivelysupported by credible andrelevant sources.In-text references areconsistently and perfectlyintegrated to support ideasand follow acceptedreferencing conventions,always acknowledging the workof others.Reference list includes all intext references and isaccurately set out following theCDU APA 7th referencingguidelinesThe ideas are well supportedby credible and relevantsources.In-text references areconsistently andappropriately integrated tosupport ideas and followaccepted referencingconventions, mostlyacknowledging the work ofothers.Reference list includes all intext references and is setout following the CDU APA7th referencing guidelinesThe ideas are satisfactorilysupported by sources that aremostly credible and relevant.In-text references are mostlyprovided to support ideas andgenerally follow acceptedreferencing conventions,sometimes acknowledging thework of others.Reference list includes mostin-text references and mostlyhas the information requiredby the CDU APA 7threferencing guidelinesThe ideas are supported bylimited credible and relevantsources.In-text references are notalways provided to supportideas and do not consistentlyfollow accepted referencingconventions, at timesacknowledging the work ofothers.Reference list includes mostin-text references and anattempt has been made toinclude required detailsThe ideas are not supported byan adequate number of credibleand relevant sources.OROveruse of direct quotes hassignificantly detracted from therequired word count.Several required in-textreferences are not provided tosupport ideas and acceptedreferencing conventions are notfollowed, not appropriatelyacknowledging the work ofothers.There is no reference pageTotal: 100%
