SOLUTION: Promoting Clinical Excellence Assessment task | My Assignment Tutor

4 | SNPG927 ASSESSMENT TASK DETAILS – AUTUMN 2021 Assessment 2Written AssessmentDue dateWeek 7, Wednesday 15th April 2021 at 17:00 hoursWeighting40%SubmissionYour assignment will be submitted into a Turnitin submission box within the SNPG927Moodle site. You will have the opportunity to review and re-submit your assignment upto the due date and time. To learn more about how to use Turnitin please access theresources at the following link:https://www.uow.edu.au/student/learning-co-op/technology-and-software/turnitin/Type of CollaborationIndividual AssessmentLength1000 wordsDetailsThis assignment requires you to analyse the causes of error in a patient story andidentify how care could be improved using the clinical governance domains (leadershipand culture; consumer partnerships; workforce; risk management; and clinical practice).You will watch a prescribed Patient Story and complete the assessment task using thetemplate provided.This assessment will require you to:1. Watch the prescribed patient story (available in the assessment task 2 Turnitindrop box)2. Complete a Fishbone diagram (using the template provided) (not included inword count)3. Analyse the care the person experienced using The London Protocol. Discussyour findings from this analysis. (using the template provided) (500 words)4. Discuss how the clinical governance domains (leadership and culture; consumerpartnerships; workforce; risk management; and clinical practice) can be used toimprove care for the patient story (using the template provided (500 words)Word counts provided above are intended as a guide.Style and formatWritten assessmentReference style/format as per Author – Date (APA 7)A summary of the APA system can be accessed in the online guide on the Librarywebsite at: http://uow.libguides.com/refcite/apa7Subject LearningOutcomes1, 2, 5Marking CriteriaSee Rubric page 7-9 7 | SNPG927 ASSESSMENT TASK DETAILS – AUTUMN 2021Assessment RubricSNPG927: Promoting Clinical Excellence Assessment task 2 Overall weighting: 40% CriteriaHigh Distinction 100%Distinction 80%Credit 70%Pass 60%Fail 49%Fail 25%Fail 0%Criterion 1 – Fishbone diagram – 20%Fishbone diagrampresented and used todemonstrate analysis ofcontributing causes toactual eventFishbone diagram isappropriately labelled withproblem expressed clearly anddistinctly in one shortenedsentence, and appropriate anddistinct categories presentedthat are relevant to the patientstory and conceptualise allpossible issues.Causes are documented ineach category (3 to 4 causesfor each) and reflect conceptsexplored in patient story andrelevant to category they aredescribed within.Causes that are documentedreflect comprehensive analysisof issues explored withinpatient story and in eachcategory.Fishbone diagram islabelled with problemexpressed in onesentence. Categories arelabelled andappropriate.Causes are documentedin each category andreflect conceptsexplored in patientstory.Causes that aredocumented reflectexploration of mostissues identified inpatient story andindicate comprehensiveanalysis.Fishbone diagram islabelled with problemidentified. Categoriesare labelled but there isoverlap and/orduplication of issues inpatient story.Causes are documentedin all categories butoverlap and/orduplication of issues inpatient story is evident.Causes that aredocumented reflectthorough analysis ofissues.Fishbone diagram islabelled with problemidentified but poorlydescribed. Categorylabels explore a rangeof issues.A range of causes aredocumented in mostcategories.Causes that aredocumented reflectsome analysis of issuesidentified in patientstory.Problem is notidentified.Category labelsexplore a smallnumber of issues.Causes aredocumented insome categories.Limited evidenceof analysisevidentProblem is notidentified.Category labelsare not reflectiveof issues inpatient story.Causes aredocumented in afew categories.Limited analysisevidentProblem is notidentified.Category labelsdo not reflectissues in patientstory.Causes are notdocumented.No evidence ofanalysisCriterion 2 – Analysis of care and contextual factors in patient story/narrative – 20%Analysis of care &contextual factors inpatient story/narrativeanalysied and presentedusing The London ProtocolPresented a detailed, logicaland comprehensive analysis ofthe situation using the LondonProtocol.Findings from the analysis aredirectly linked to the patientstory, synthesised, prioritisedand presented as key issues.Presented a broadanalysis of the situationusing the LondonProtocol.Findings from analysisare analysed andexplored in thediscussion. Linkagesbetween findings andpatient experience areclear.Presented a goodanalysis of the situationusing the LondonProtocol. Application ofthe framework wasappropriate but requiredimprovement to beconsideredcomprehensive.Findings from analysisare discussed withlinkages made betweenfindings and patientexperience.Presented an analysis ofthe situation andattempted to use theLondon Protocol.Application of theframework was limitedwith only somecontextual factorsanalysed.Finding from analysisare discussed (but not insignificant depth) andare not always linked topatient experience.Presentedminimal analysisof situation. Useof an appropriateframework foranalysis waslimited.Minimaldiscussion offindings fromanalysis andminimal linkagesbetween patientexperience andfindings fromanalysis.Presentedsuperficialanalysis ofsituation. Use ofan appropriateframework foranalysis waslimited.Minimaldiscussion offindings fromanalysis and withpoor linkagesbetween patientexperience andanalysisPresented noanalysis ofsituation. Use ofan appropriateframework foranalysis wasabsent.No discussion offindings fromanalysis and nolinkages betweenpatientexperience andanalysis 8 SNPG927 ASSESSMENT TASK DETAILS – SPRING 2020 Criterion 3 – Analysis of Clinical Governance domains and application to patient story/narrative – 30%Analysis of clinicalgovernance domains(leadership and culture;consumer partnerships;workforce; riskmanagement; and clinicalpractice) and application toyour patientstory/narrative.Demonstrated an exceptionalknowledge and understandingof the clinical governancedomains and how they couldbe used to improve carerelated to the patient storyDemonstrated a verygood knowledge andunderstanding of theclinical governancedomains and how theycould be used toimprove care related tothe patient storyDemonstrated a goodunderstanding of theclinical governancedomains and how theycould be used toimprove care related tothe patient story.Demonstrated areasonableunderstanding of theclinical governancedomains and how theycould be used toimprove care related tothe patient storyDemonstratedminimalknowledge andunderstanding ofthe clinicalgovernancedomains and howthey could beused to improvecare related to thepatient storyDemonstratedpoor knowledgeand understandingof the clinicalgovernancedomains and howthey could beused to improvecare related to thepatient storyDemonstrated noknowledge/understanding ofthe clinicalgovernancedomains and howthey could beused to improvecare related to thepatient storyCriterion 4 – Connection & synthesis of literature – 10%How well is evidence fromcurrent literatureconnected to analysis ofpatient story/narrativeAnalysis and synthesis ofthe main ideas fromliterature are integrated andstrongly linked to analysisof patient story.Demonstrates criticalthinking and independentthought. There is evidenceof highly developedsynthesis skills.Clear evidence ofwell-developedanalytical andevaluative skillsconnecting literatureto analysis of patientstoryClear comparisonsare well drawn.Well-reasonedargument based onbroad evidence.Evidence of analyticaland evaluative skills.Evidence of evaluationand syntheses of ideasin terms of relatedliterature.Sound argument basedon evidence.Some evidence ofanalytical andevaluative skills.Limited/basicunderstanding of thetopic.Limited andinsufficientevidenceincorporated intowork.There is limitedevidence ofcritique orsynthesis.Inappropriateevidenceincorporated intowork.There is noevidence ofcritique orsynthesisNo evidenceincorporated intowork.There is noevidence ofcritique orsynthesisCriterion 5 – Expression and academic writing – 10%Writing is authentic andclearly expresses ideas.Uses correct spelling andparagraph structurethroughout.Structured as per UOWassessment Handbook.Outstanding academic writing.Introductory sentence used atthe start of paragraphs. Mainsubject matter is developedwithin each paragraph.Concluding sentence used atthe end of paragraphs.Exemplary spelling, grammar& syntax with no errors.Meets all style requirements.Evidence of superioracademic writing skills.Discussion in eachparagraph providessufficient depth todemonstrateunderstanding.Superior spelling,grammar, & syntax 10).In-textreferencing maybe absent and/orreference list andcontains majorerrors (>10).Absent in-textreferencingand/or referencelist. Please note: When using this rubric you must fulfil all the lower criteria before being awarded a higher grade.