SOLUTION: Skills for the Social Sciences ASS065-1 | My Assignment Tutor

Submission DeadlineMarks and FeedbackBefore 10am on: 26/03/2021 Submission to BREO before 10am 20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)15 working days after deadline (L6)10 working days after deadline (block delivery) 23/04/2021 Unit title & codeSkills for the Social Sciences ASS065-1Assignment number and titleAssignment 1 PortfolioAssignment typePortfolioWeighting of assignment40%Size or length of assessment2000 wordsUnit learning outcomes1. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the contribution made by social science disciplines to the generation of knowledge claims and the creation of contested interpretations of contemporary social issues in the UK and other societies in the world 2. Demonstrate the ability to analyse a contemporary social issue from different disciplinary perspectives within the social sciences and the public policy approach in addressing this issue by drawing on social science research knowledge What am I required to do in this assignment?Write a 2000 word-essay in answer to the question: What are the main differences between quantitative and qualitative research methods in the social sciences? What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)Demonstrate empirical knowledge of a key social issue. This knowledge will be shown in the way you understand the contribution of social science disciplinary approaches to the investigation of social issue. Demonstrate conceptual understanding of different social science theories. This understanding will be shown in the way you compare and contrast the differing conceptualisations of the social issue from the perspective of rival social science theories. Demonstrate effective understanding of social science research. You will show this by identifying the ways in which alternative social science theories may be ideologically aligned to enrich understanding of the social issue. How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?Structure Introduction (250-300 words): Explain the purpose of your essayGive a description of what each section will containProvide any relevant definitions (e.g. positivism, quantitative) Part 1, section 1 (300 words): Which theoretical approaches tend to use quantitative methodologies and which tend to use qualitative? Explain why by describing the theoretical ideas of different approaches to the social sciences (Hint: positivism and interpretivism will be very important in this section). Part 1, section 2 (500 words): Explain the key differences between quantitative and qualitative research. To help you, think about the following questions: What types of methodologies are commonly used in quantitative research? Why?What types of methodologies are commonly used in qualitative research? Why?Why do sample sizes differ between quantitative and qualitative research methodologies? Part 2 (700 words): Choose and find four articles from the selection you have been given. Pick two quantitative and two qualitative. Explain the key arguments of your quantitative articlesExplain the key arguments of your qualitative articlesCompare the methods for data collection between your articles, paying particular attention to:Sample size How data was collected – e.g. was it interviews? A survey? Was it conducted in-person or online? Finally, explain why you think this method of data collection was chosen Conclusion (200-250 words): Provide a summary conclusion, explaining what you covered in your essay and the three or four key points you made. Reference list (no word limit): Include a reference list in the Harvard referencing style. You must include all texts that you have cited in your proposal. You should read widely and your references should include a mixture of sources, including academic journal articles, books and chapters in edited volumes. You must cite relevant sources in all sections of your portfolio! How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?The assignment asks you to think about and link together the topics covered in the first 9 weeks of the unit. How will my assignment be marked? Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit. 3rd Class – 40-49%Lower 2nd – 50-59%Upper 2nd – 60-69%1st Class – 70%+ StructureThe piece was mostly structured according to the assignment brief but lacked coherence.The piece was structured according to the assignment brief but the sections were not linked together successfully or at all.The piece was structured according to the assignment brief and the student had managed to link the sections together in places.The piece was structured according to the assignment brief and the student had managed to link the sections consistently. Understanding – Concepts in Social TheoryYour discussion of social theory showed some limited awareness of key terms but did not demonstrate understanding.Your discussion of social theory showed decent understanding of key terms and concepts.Your discussion of social theory showed good understanding and relevant description of key ideas.Your discussion of social theory showed very good understanding and relevant description of key ideas as well as some analysis. Understanding – analysis of articlesYou have not correctly identified all articles as quantitative or qualitative.You have correctly identified all articles as quantitative or qualitative but your discussion of research methodologies was inaccurate or superficial in places.You have correctly identified all articles as quantitative or qualitative. Your discussion of research methodologies was generally good but could have been more detailed.You have correctly identified all articles as quantitative or qualitative. Your discussion of research methodologies was very good and showed depth of understanding. Written expression and information gatheringWritten expression is acceptable but with frequent grammatical errors and occasional lapses in academic practice.Written expression was good although there were minor grammatical errors and/or proof-reading mistakes.Written expression was good with few grammatical errors or proof-reading mistakes.Written expression was very good with virtually no grammatical errors or proof-reading mistakes. ReferencingReferencing technique was poor and there are issues with missing references.Referencing technique is satisfactory, but the work contains referencing mistakes.Referencing technique is good, but there are some minor referencing mistakes.Referencing technique is excellent throughout.