E3 (the instruction) its about design thinking the agile way.
Is the same as last teaching block… three blog posts commentating on your engagement and participation on parts of the module of your choosing (e.g. we like to see people engaging in the part of the module in which we covered ‘design thinking’…have you written a blog post on that? How you might apply design thinking in your own practice…perhaps that might be one of your three posts) .
Three Reflective Blog Posts on your Mini-Project / Engagement with the Module
For each of the THREE posts, use EITHER ONE of the following:
500 words written reflection;
60 sec Video/Audio;
10 Photos/Images (e.g. a photo-blog or photo-essay)
It is important that your reflect on ALL relevant content of the module relating to your mini-project
PLEASE REFER TO THE ASSESSMENT RUBRIC BELOW
Rubric
E3: Engagement and Participation [HA7513]
E3: Engagement and Participation [HA7513]
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome INSIGHT
Contribution of informative ways of understanding contextual information in an original manner
EXCELLENT ENGAGEMENT
Makes a wide range of observations; shows depth in their understanding of concepts and theories and, an exceptional ability to see or articulate issues/things in context and in ways others have not seen or recognised.
VERY GOOD / GOOD ENGAGEMENT
Makes a range of observations; shows a good understanding of concepts and theories; and, a good ability to see or articulate issues/things in context and in ways others have not seen or recognised.
SATISFACTORY ENGAGEMENT
Makes some observations and shows some understanding of concepts and theories. There is a satisfactory ability to see or articulate issues/things in context and in ways others have not seen or recognised.
MINOR ENGAGEMENT
Makes a few observations but shows a limited understanding of concepts and theories. There is some limited evidence that the student sees or articulates issues/things in context and in ways others have not seen or recognised.
NO ENGAGEMENT
No evidence of that the student understands concepts and theories encountered in the module. There is no evidence that the student sees or articulates issues/things in context and in ways others have not seen or recognised.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome READING
Interpretation of the meaning of texts of a range of possible formats including: written text, film, music, websites, podcasts, blogs, photography, graphic communication
EXCELLENT ENGAGEMENT
Compares and contrasts a range of texts and interprets the meaning of these texts to an exceptionally high standard.
VERY GOOD / GOOD ENGAGEMENT
Compares and contrasts a range of texts and interprets the meaning of these texts to a good / very good standard.
SATISFACTORY ENGAGEMENT
Compares and contrasts some texts and interprets the meaning of these texts to a satisfactory standard.
MINOR ENGAGEMENT
Compares and contrasts a limited number of texts. The interpretation of the meaning of these texts is limited.
NO ENGAGEMENT
There is no evidence the student has been able to compare and contrast texts. The student does not interpret the meaning of texts encountered.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome USE OF EXAMPLES
Application of knowledge to a range of examples from different contexts combined with an ability to apply own examples to conceptual and theoretical frames of reference
EXCELLENT ENGAGEMENT
Draws on a wide range of exceptionally relevant examples from their own research and/or experience.
VERY GOOD / GOOD ENGAGEMENT
Draws on a range of good examples from their own research and/or experience.
SATISFACTORY ENGAGEMENT
Draws on some examples from their own research and/or experience.
MINOR ENGAGEMENT
Draws on a limited range of examples from their own research and/or experience.
NO ENGAGEMENT
Does not draw on examples from their own research and/or experience.
The post E3 (the instruction) its about design thinking the agile way.
Is the same as las appeared first on Homeworkassisters.
