Machine Learning Classifier Using Weka

Section 1 — Upload final data file
Section 2 — Business/research questions
1. Using BRFSS data set, state the three business or research questions that you have attempted to answer through your analysis, and justify why they are interesting (300 words maximum)

Section 3 — Processing the data

1. Describe how you explored the data, why you did it that way, and what conclusions you drew about it (300 words maximum)

2. Describe the cleaning/fixing you did on the data, and why (300 words)

Section 4 — Data analysis
3. Explain what analysis techniques you used to answer your business/research questions, and why (300 words maximum)

4. Summarise the results of your analysis (300 words maximum)

5. What do the results say in answer to your business/research questions? (300 words maximum)

6. Describe the most salient threats to validity that remain in your analysis (300 words maximum)

Section 5 — Dealing with large data sets
7. Describe how you could represent the data in a relational database — give a suitable schema, and describe a mechanism for converting it to a suitable input form for WEKA (300 words maximum)

8. Describe a way that you could use appropriate technologies to spread the load over multiple computers, and justify why this would be a good approach (300 words maximum)

Section 6 — Privacy
9. List the three most salient privacy issues related to this analysis, and give strategies you could use to address each of them (300 words maximum)

Section 7 — Report references
10. Provide a correctly structured list of references to all the resources used for this development and report (no word limit)

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement
Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.
Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.
Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter Argument
Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion
– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.
The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.
Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.