Suppose a NASA task force is reviewing a final draft of an accident/incident report, and you have been tasked with determining whether the conclusions presented in the final draft are in line with the data/findings presented within the report. Why would construct validity be part of your thought process in completing such a task? Now consider a specific real world example in which NASA needed to investigate an accident/incident to determine the cause. How would construct validity be applied in this example, and why would it be important to prove that validity? -

Suppose a NASA task force is reviewing a final draft of an accident/incident report, and you have been tasked with determining whether the conclusions presented in the final draft are in line with the data/findings presented within the report. Why would construct validity be part of your thought process in completing such a task?

Now consider a specific real world example in which NASA needed to investigate an accident/incident to determine the cause. How would construct validity be applied in this example, and why would it be important to prove that validity?