ENG7142 – Research Methods
Academic Poster Mark Sheet 2020/21 B
Assessment
Criteria
2. Visual Display
3. Academic References & Critical Analysis
4. Discussion / Defence
Weighting:
0.3
0.4
0.3
Grading
Criteria
0 – 29%
F
Poster either incoherent or lacking awareness of basic presentation requirements, or lacking relevant content.
No or limited evidence of research.
Responses are incoherent or display lack of essential knowledge and/or relevance.
30 – 39%
E
Poster lacks information on key aspects of research, but should be able to attain pass standard with some additional time in preparation
Little evidence of research. Poster reiterates information gathered from few sources.
Serious shortfall in ability to explain fundamentals, but should be able to reach pass standard with some additional preparation.
40 – 49%
D
Some deficiencies of key points, lacking clarity, and/or with little impact and some errors. There may be indication of a shortage of planning and care in composing/creating the display. However it adequately presents some of the main points.
Some relevant research but lacking in extent and level required.
Some hesitance in responses/discussion indicates lack of familiarity with the topic and wider issues, and/or lack of understanding in some areas. However there are adequate responses to questions on key points of knowledge/understanding.
50 – 59%
C
Reasonable encapsulation of key points, although the poster may be over-detailed or, in part, lacking a clear message and/or including minor errors.
Generally competent research but not all relevant to the subject in question.
Reasonable responses to questions and is able adequately to discuss straightforward aspects. There may be some minor deficiencies in knowledge.
60 – 69%
B
Good encapsulation of key points, generally clear, with good impact and error free.
Broad and relevant research demonstrating methodical approach and analysis.
Good responses to questions and in discussion appear to be generally familiar with the specific topic and with relevant wider issues.
70 – 79%
A
Very good encapsulation of key points, generally clear, with good impact and error free.
Broad and relevant research demonstrating methodical approach and analysis.
Very good responses to questions and in discussion appear to be generally familiar with the specific topic and with relevant wider issues.
80 – 89%
A+
Excellent encapsulation of key points, extremely clear, high impact, error free.
Succinctly summarises/critiques findings in a well-structured, coherent manner, with supporting & appropriate evidence of academic underpinning and grounded with theoretical concepts displayed in context.
Confident, succinct and informative responses to questions. In discussion, appears to be well informed on specific subject knowledge as well as wider issues associated with research.
90 – 100%
A*
Outstanding encapsulation of key points, extremely clear, high impact, error free.
Concisely summarises/critiques findings in a well-structured, coherent manner, with supporting & appropriate evidence of academic underpinning and grounded with theoretical concepts displayed in context.
Confident, (authoritative) succinct and informative responses to questions. In discussion, appears to be well informed on specific subject knowledge as well as wider issues associated with research.
Should be considered as publishable.
20
0
10
Amir Ali
Emmanuel Okoronkwo
12th May 2021
Final Academic Poster Mark (25%) = 9%
The post ENG7142 – Research Methods Academic Poster Mark Sheet 2020/21 B Assessment Criteria appeared first on PapersSpot.
