HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2
Running Head: HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2
Health Information Management
Daniel Hipsher
Southern New Hampshire University
Health Information Management
Healthcare information systems have promising results in improving healthcare services delivery. Challenges in healthcare information management cause potential challenges in healthcare that influence communication among care providers, quality care delivery, and patient safety. This paper describes healthcare information management based on the difficulties encountered by Featherfall Medical Center and consultant strategies to eliminate the critical issues.
Preparation for Consult
Analyzing the Key Historical Events in Health Informatics
The field of health informatics emerged when computer technology became sophisticated to manage extensive data, characterized by the evolution of technology. From this evolution, technology was adopted significantly in healthcare organizations to facilitate services delivery, inform quality care and facilitate information management (University of Illinois, 2020). Before integrating digital systems in healthcare, manual work, including charting patient data on paper, storing patient information of files, and communication through prints, was the primary way of sharing and storing healthcare information. Healthcare informatics has improved health information management through enhanced security, reduced errors, and easy retrieval. For instance, paperwork before technology adoption was associated with critical human errors, loss of developed data, and unintended persons’ access to health or organization information (University of Illinois, 2020). Electronic health records are critical health informatics that has enhanced information management by facilitating communication, securing data, easy updates and retrieval, facilitating management through technology.
Recommended Guidelines for Health Information Management
The guidelines for using technology in health information management at Featherfall are based on the issues encountered at the facility. Ensuring technology used in the facility conforms with government regulations regarding healthcare informatics is an essential guideline to prevent the facility from violating government regulations. Updating information systems is necessary to ensure the technology used meets the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act (Haried, Claybaugh & Dai, 2017). Ensuring clinicians are involved in selecting and implementing specific health information management systems is an essential guideline to eliminate user-interface problems that may hinder care providers from utilizing the techniques. Additionally, Featherfall must educate its healthcare staff regarding technology use in managing health information to improve their competencies and enhance utilization.
The Standard Technologies Used in Health Information Management
The standard technologies used in managing health information include electronic health records (EHR) that provide updated and accurate patient health information and management strategies. The technologies facilitate recording, storing, and securing patients’ and healthcare institutions’ health information (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). Additionally, computerized physician order entry is used to record patients’ information regarding medication and other physician orders, such as required interventions. Clinical decision systems (CDS) are also essential technologies used in health information management based on prescription information (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). These technology systems are integrated into computers and mobile devices to enhance health information management among providers regarding patients and the health organization.
An Overview of How the Pertinent Roles Described at Featherfall Would Interact with Technology
The health information management team needs to ensure the technology systems are updated and meet the recommendations by HIPPA. Additionally, the team must provide the technology installed meets Featherfall’s needs, and clinicians are trained well regarding their use for optimization. The clinical staff, including doctors and nurses, are vital consumers of healthcare technology. In this context, they would interact with technology in recording patients’ information, medication information, and prescription data. They should report issues regarding technology, such as malfunctioning, to the health information management team for immediate action. The administrative staff are responsible for ensuring health information is secured (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). In this context, they would interact with technology by providing registration of the clinical staff and details for signing in to the systems to ensure the information is accessed by authorized personnel. The team should also ensure the systems are functioning correctly for utilization.
Process of Evaluating New Health Information Systems
The first step in evaluating new health information is the system performance. The new system must display good computer language, be accessible based on user demands, foster data safety, and have a good model that suits the facility. Additionally, the systems should have compatibility details, installation documentation, and user procedures and be flexible (Haried, Claybaugh & Dai, 2017). The second step is evaluating the information performance of the systems based on precision, accuracy, and promptness based on the needs of the facility. Another evaluation is the information output capacity, where the systems should offer guidelines for information manipulation. User satisfaction based on costs and maintenance is critical to ensure the designs suit the organization’s budget. Additionally, the performance of the intended services is evaluated based on schedules, employees using the systems, informed input/output methods, and vital technical abilities to allow optimization based on the organization’s needs (Haried, Claybaugh & Dai, 2017). The systems should also reflect the critical competencies based on government regulations and HIPPA requirements of healthcare technology.
References
Alotaibi, Y., & Federico, F. (2017). The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(12), 1173-1180. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631
Haried, P., Claybaugh, C., & Dai, H. (2017). Evaluation of health information systems research in information systems research: A meta-analysis. Health Informatics Journal, 25(1), 186-202. doi: 10.1177/1460458217704259
University of Illinois. (2020). A Brief History of Health Informatics |. Retrieved 15 August 2021, from https://healthinformatics.uic.edu/blog/a-brief-history-of-health-informatics/
The post HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2 Running Head: HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2 Health Information appeared first on PapersSpot.
