WU Qinyue VIVA
Name: WU Qinyue
Degree Level: PGT
Date: September 2021
Target Level: 6.5 (6.0)
Final Mark: 68
General comments and suggestions for further improvement
Review IT skills as it will affect you in the future
ambiguous
modular education
6-week PEAP 4 Blended: Oral Assessment – Viva Feedback (2021)
Genre
68
4A: Very good
68 (7.0)
4B: Good
63 (6.5)
4C: General
58 (6.0)
4D: Partial
53 (5.5)
4E: Limited
48 (5.0)
‘Presentation’ of ideas
Overall coverage & relevance
Very effective summary of ideas with no serious deviation from key points within the time limit
Good coverage of mostly relevant points within the time limit
Adequate coverage of points within the time limit but some content may seem unnecessary
Coverage partially affected due to problems with timing and/or unnecessary content
Incomplete coverage due to issues with timing and/or inclusion of largely unnecessary content
‘Presentation’ of ideas
Use of visual
Wholly appropriate and very effective visual support
Appropriate and effective visual support
Mostly appropriate and effective visual support, but inconsistent
Visual support is not entirely appropriate and/or is ineffective
Inappropriate and/or ineffective visual support
Discussion and interaction with assessors: dialogue & communication strategies
Very good dialogue & communication strategies with few weaknesses
Good dialogue & communication strategies with only minor weaknesses
Generally appropriate dialogue & communication strategies but with some weaknesses
Some appropriate dialogue and communication strategies but weaknesses inhibit the interaction
Restricted dialogue and communication strategies cause breakdowns in the interaction
Overall comprehension of assessors’ comments and questions
Rare lack of comprehension and any problems are repaired naturally
Occasional lack of comprehension, but this is repaired by clarification or simplification of questions
Some lack of comprehension, but repair is mostly successful
Lack of comprehension is noticeable at times and repair is only partially successful
Lack of comprehension is intrusive at times, requiring frequent attempts at repair from both parties
General response to the assessors’ questions
Consistent and successful attempts to respond to questions, with an appropriate mix of both short and full answers
Mostly successful attempts to respond to questions, with a mostly appropriate mix of short and full answers
Generally adequate attempts to respond to questions, but may occasionally struggle with giving full answers
Basic attempts to respond to questions with mainly short answers and only infrequent full responses
Limited or unsuccessful attempts to respond to questions, relying heavily on short answers with almost no full responses
Coherence and organisation of turns
Turns are coherent and organised with only occasional lapses
Turns are coherent and organised with a few minor lapses
Turns are generally coherent and organised but with some occasional but obvious lapses
Some turns are coherent & organised, but there are consistent lapses
Some turns are reasonably coherent and organised, but frequent lapses cause strain
Fluency
Very fluent throughout the assessment, with little or no hesitation, leading to a very ‘natural’ conversation
Mostly fluent but with possible minor hesitation at times, but this has no significant effect on communication
Some fluency, but hesitation occasionally has a negative effect on communication, but with no serious breakdowns
Only partial fluency, and hesitation often has a negative effect on communication, leading to some breakdowns
Lacks fluency, and frequent hesitation has a serious effect on communication, leading to frequent breakdowns
Criticality
68
4A: Very good
68 (7.0)
4B: Good
63 (6.5)
4C: General
58 (6.0)
4D: Partial
53 (5.5)
4E: Limited
48 (5.0)
Comprehension of and response to probing questions on:
Chosen sources
Very good* ability to:
Good* ability to:
General* ability to:
Partial* ability to:
Limited* ability to:
identify and analyse the strengths & weaknesses of chosen sources
identify and analyse the strengths & weaknesses of chosen sources
identify and analyse the strengths & weaknesses of chosen sources
identify and analyse the strengths & weaknesses of chosen sources
identify and analyse the strengths & weaknesses of chosen sources
Academic positions
explain, argue & defend own position (and to analyse others, as appropriate)
explain, argue & defend own position (and to analyse others, as appropriate)
explain, argue & defend own position (and to analyse others, as appropriate)
explain, argue & defend own position (and to analyse others, as appropriate)
explain, argue & defend own position (and to analyse others, as appropriate)
Conclusions & recommendations
explore potential conclusions and make recommendations
explore potential conclusions and make recommendations
explore potential conclusions and make recommendations
explore potential conclusions and make recommendations
explore potential conclusions and make recommendations
Reflection on:
Challenges & experiences of the research and writing process
Very good* ability to:
Good* ability to:
General* ability to:
Partial* ability to:
Limited* ability to:
reflect on challenges & experiences of the research and writing process
reflect on challenges & experiences of the research and writing process
reflect on challenges & experiences of the research and writing process
reflect on challenges & experiences of the research and writing process
reflect on challenges & experiences of the research and writing process
Key lessons learned from the online course
identify, explain and reflect on key lessons learned
identify, explain and reflect on key lessons learned
identify, explain and reflect on key lessons learned
identify, explain and reflect on key lessons learned
identify, explain and reflect on key lessons learned
Links to future study
link experiences on this course to future study in a meaningful way
link experiences on this course to future study in a meaningful way
Adequate ability to link experiences on this course to future study in a meaningful way
Only partial ability to link experiences on this course to future study in a meaningful way
Only limited ability to link experiences on this course to future study in a meaningful way
* VERY GOOD criticality = consistently clear and reasonably sophisticated | GOOD criticality = mostly clear with occasional sophistication | GENERAL criticality = adequate, but lacks clarity and depth at times | PARTIAL criticality = often missing or unclear & mostly quite superficial | LIMITED criticality = frequently missing or unclear & superficial
Language
68
4A: Very good
68 (7.0)
4B: Good
63 (6.5)
4C: General
58 (6.0)
4D: Partial
53 (5.5)
4E: Limited
48 (5.0)
Lexis
Range
An appropriate, wide and flexible lexical range
A mostly successful and appropriate lexical range
An adequate lexical range
A restricted lexical range
A limited lexical range
Accuracy
Occasional errors but no impact on meaning
Some errors, but no significant impact on meaning
Errors evident, with occasional impact on meaning
Errors noticeable, and these impact on meaning
Frequent errors, leading to a serious loss of meaning
Grammar
Range
A wide range
A good range
An adequate range
A restricted range
An inadequate range
Accuracy
Occasional errors but no impact on communication
Some errors but no significant impact on communication
Errors evident, with occasional impact on communication
Errors noticeable and these often impair communication
Frequent errors, leading to breakdowns in communication
Cohesion
Consistently links ideas clearly and effectively using a very good range of cohesive devices
Links most ideas clearly & effectively using a good range of cohesive devices
Links some ideas clearly with an adequate range of cohesive devices, but with occasional issues
A restricted range of cohesive devices means many ideas are not clearly linked
An inadequate range of cohesive devices means most links between ideas are not clear
Pronunciation
Phoneme/word level
Very good pronunciation at phoneme/word level with no serious issues
Good pronunciation at phoneme/word level with only a few minor issues
Adequate pronunciation at phoneme/word level with occasional issues
Inconsistent pronunciation at phoneme/word level with noticeable issues
Consistent and serious issues with pronunciation at phoneme/word level
Sentence level
Very effective use of intonation to communicate meaning
Mostly effective use of intonation to communicate meaning
Adequate use of intonation to communicate meaning, but with occasional lapses
Ineffective use of intonation sometimes leads to a loss of meaning
Lack of appropriate intonation leads to a consistent loss of meaning
The post WU Qinyue VIVA Name: WU Qinyue Degree Level: PGT Date: September 2021 appeared first on PapersSpot.
