Assistive Technology (SIH505), Level 5, 20 credits
Assessment Brief
The assessment for Assistive Technology has one component part.
(Weighting 100%)
Task 1
‘Exhibition Content Report’
Due to Covid and standardised team review the assessment ‘on-site’ cannot take place. The assessment theme of preparing for an Assistive Technology exhibition, however you will submit a ‘Exhibition Content Report’ (2500 words) to address all four learning outcomes.
The document should be titled; ‘Exhibition Content Report’ to ensure you keep within the parameters of the intended plan.
The document should include relevant headings / subheadings (see guidance below) and connect to your chosen and agreed theme.
The document (2500 words on a Word Document) will be submitted via Turnitin
Prepare an exhibition with supporting evidence to.:
LO1- Explain the need for the development and use of assistive technologies in Health and Social Care provision.
1.0 Definitions, Drivers & Demographics, to include:
Introduction to task
Visual/ diagram highlighting types of Assistive Technology (AT) in HSC
Definition(s) of AT
Drivers for AT – to include WHO, Government, NHS
Your chosen theme (E.g.: Palliative Care, Mental Health, Dementia Care) and why?
Demographics – Access – Inequalities
Service Levels – include relevant Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
LO2– Examine new developments in assistive technology, the challenges and potential ethical issues.
2.0 Resources & Developments, to include:
From this section content should connect to your chosen and agreed theme……
AT resources and developments
Challenges and Barriers
Demand & Expectation (May connect with service levels in LO1)
Ethical Considerations – define and inform of key ethical considerations
LO3-Analyse the influence of technology on models of care for the planning and provision of health and social care services.
3.0 The Influence of Assistive Technology, to include:
Analyse the influence of AT (resources, equipment – PROs and CONs) – This may be presented via a detailed table
Identify a range of ‘New Care Models’ that connect and influence the planning and provisions of care – this could be introduced as visual to identify a range of models and then select 2/3 models to review and appraise in detail
Improvements & Enhancements – self-care, independence and interdependence, response to changing needs and demographics, Virtual health Care and Health House, etc.
LO4-Evaluate how assistive technology can meet the needs, improve opportunities, reduce inequalities and improve the health and wellbeing for the individual accessing health and social care services.
4.0 Evaluating the Impacts of Assistive Technology, to include:
The evidence – evaluate how AT across your chosen theme/ area has improved opportunities, reduced inequalities, improved health and well-being, etc. Review any data, trends to show impact(s)
How assistive technology meets needs, individual and service provision.
How does AT improve health and well-being
How does AT reduce inequalities
Conclude and finish
ENSURE REFERENCES
Assessment Weighting Criteria (100%)
The following assessment criteria will be used to mark the assessment activities:
Assessment CriteriaIndicative weightingExhibition with supporting report. LO1-Explain the need for the development and use of assistive technologies in Health and Social Care provision.25%LO2– Examine new developments in assistive technology, the challenges and potential ethical issues.25%LO3– Analyse the influence of technology on models of care for the planning and provision of health and social care services.25%LO4– Evaluate how assistive technology can meet the needs, improve opportunities, reduce inequalities and improve the health and wellbeing for the individual accessing health and social care services. 25%
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION
All assignment will be submitted in electronic format and uploaded to LSC Portal on Turnitin
Date assignment setJune 2023Submission deadline task 111/08/2023Return date to Students08/09/2023
Assistive Technology –summative assignmentStudent Feedback Form Programme:Supporting Innovation in Health and Social CareStudent ID: Module Name:Assistive TechnologyGraded by: Assessor Name Module Code:SIH505Assessment type:Exhibition with supporting ReportSecond Marker Name (if appropriate): Assessment Date: Date Graded: Title: Internal live exhibition with supporting evidence and a 2500 word supporting report. Module learning outcomes LO1 – Explain the need for the development and use of assistive technologies in Health and Social Care provision. LO2 – Examine new developments in assistive technology, the challenges and potential ethical issues. LO3 – Analyse the influence of technology on models of care for the planning and provision of health and social care services. LO4 – Evaluate how assistive technology can meet the needs, improve opportunities, reduce inequalities and improve the health and wellbeing for the individual accessing health and social care services.
Learning Outcome / Assessment Criteria Fail 0-39 Pass 40-49 Merit 50-59 Distinction 60-69 Distinction* 70-100 LO1. Explain the need for the development and use of assistive technologies in Health and Social Care provision. 25 marks Knowledge and understanding of the drivers: WHO, UK Gov, NHS (e.g. changing demographics, response to current demands, consumer expectations, quality, personalisation, access to services, self-care, financial resources, addressing inequalities, cultural and gender discrimination and the determinants of health).The work examined provides insufficient evidence of knowledge and understanding of the topic and is lacking development. The work is heavily dependent on description with poor evidence of linking factors. There is barely adequate use of literature or reading around the topic to support content. Review study guides related to assignment planning and critical reading which are available to meet LO requirements, academic support could also be accessed to review your work prior to submission. <10 marksThe work examined is sufficient to display basic knowledge and understanding but is largely descriptive. There is an attempt to bring together different aspects with little evidence of analysis of relevant factors included and limited use of references to support points. Review study guides related to assignment planning and critical reading which are available to improve and develop higher order skills. 10-12 marksThe work examined is good and demonstrates sound understanding of some of the drivers with some interpretation and comparison of relevant factors included. Competent use of source material using a variety of recent literature. 12-14 marksVery good, the work examined is coherently structured, demonstrates a substantial knowledge and understanding of the drivers, which analyses the main factors supported by very good use of source material using a range of sources. 15-17 marksThe work examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the drivers. There is coherence of ideas which evaluates the drivers, supported with compelling evaluation and interpretation with effective use of source material and accurate referencing. >17 marksLO2. Examine new developments in assistive technology, the challenges and potential ethical issues. 25 marks Knowledge and understanding of the new developments in assistive technology with examination of the challenges, safe use, Putting People First, overcoming barriers, cultural and ethical issues relevant to the impact on the health status.The work examined provides insufficient evidence of the knowledge and understanding, and more detailed examination would have been required to meet this LO. The work is heavily dependent on description with poor evidence of linking the factors included. There is barely adequate use of literature or reading around the topic to support content. Review study guides related to assignment planning and critical reading which are available to improve and develop higher order skills and access academic support. <10 marksThe work examined is sufficient to display basic knowledge and understanding applied to new developments. There is some attempt to discuss links applied to the impact on health but is largely descriptive. There is little evidence of analysis of relevant factors included with limited use of references to support points. The development of these points would need to be included to improve grade. Review study guides related to assignment planning and critical reading which are available to improve and develop higher order skills and access academic support. 10-12 marksThe work examined is good and demonstrates sound understanding of the new developments examined. There is some interpretation of the challenges etc. relevant to the impact on the health status. Competent use of source material using a variety of recent literature to support main points. 12-14 marksVery good, the work examined is coherently structured, demonstrates a substantial knowledge which examines new developments and explores many of the challenges etc. with a clear understanding which analyses issues relevant to the impact on health status. There is a good attempt to evaluate these factors supported by very good use of source material using a range of sources to support main points. 15-17 marksThe work examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding which examines the challenges etc. of the new developments examined. There is coherence of ideas with analysis of factors considering the impact on health status, with compelling evaluation and interpretation which is supported with effective use of source material and accurate referencing. >17 marksLO3. Analyse the influence of technology on models of care for the planning and provision of health and social care services. 25 marks Knowledge and understanding of changing models of care, services working together, transition alliances and local needs. Knowledge and understanding of the issues from empowerment, improved self-care, independence and interdependence, response to changing needs and demographics.The exhibition content examined provides insufficient evidence to meet this LO. The work demonstrates a weak knowledge base and limited understanding. The work is heavily descriptive, with poor evidence of linking analysis of the factors which would need to be included to improve your grade. Review study guides in critical reading and research, and access academic support in planning and to review your work prior to submission. <10 marksThe exhibition content examined is relevant but largely descriptive, displays a basic knowledge and understanding. There is an attempt to bring together different ideas and concepts with evidence of some analysis of the issues, with limited use of source literature to support points included. These points would improve your grade and to review study guides in critical reading and research, and access academic support in planning and to review your work prior to submission. 10-12 marksThe exhibition content examined is good, demonstrating evidence of sound understanding. There is some interpretation and analysis of different factors relevant but sometimes prone to description or narrative which at times lacks clarity of relevant perspectives. Competent use of relevant and current source material to support to illustrate points. 12-14 marksVery good, the exhibition content examined demonstrates a substantial knowledge. There is evidence of formulation of a good analysis containing some independent thinking with attempts to evaluate issues. Very good use of source material used to support the main points included. 15-17 marksThe exhibition content examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding. The evaluation demonstrates coherence of ideas, effectively supported by wide reading with appropriate use of source material and accurate referencing. >17 marksLO4. Evaluate how assistive technology can meet the needs, improve opportunities, reduce inequalities and improve the health and wellbeing for the individual accessing health and social care services. 25 marks Knowledge and understanding of how the AT meets needs, individual and service provision, improve health and well-being and reduce inequalities considering the individual accessing health and social care services.The evidence examined provides insufficient evidence to meet this LO. The work demonstrates a weak knowledge base and limited understanding. The work is heavily descriptive, with poor evidence of linking the factors included, containing many unsupported statements with barely adequate links to literature. These points would improve your grade and to review study guides in critical reading and research, and access academic support in planning and to review your work prior to submission. <10 marksThe evidence examined is relevant but largely descriptive, displays a basic knowledge and understanding. There is an attempt to bring together different ideas and concepts with little evidence of analysis of the factors included, with limited use of source literature to support points included. These points would improve your grade and to review study guides in critical reading and research, and access academic support in planning and to review your work prior to submission. 10-12 marksThe evidence examined is good, demonstrating a sound understanding. There is some interpretation and analysis of different factors but sometimes prone to description or narrative which at times lacks clarity. Competent use of relevant and current source material to support and to illustrate points. 12-14 marksVery good, the evidence examined demonstrates a substantial knowledge and understanding. There is evidence of the formulation of a good analysis containing some independent thinking which attempts to evaluate the impact on the individual accessing health and social care services. Very good use of source material used to support the main points included. 15-17 marksThe evidence examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding. The evaluation in this study demonstrates coherence of ideas and a thorough knowledge and independent thinking to formulate a subjective conclusion, effectively supported by wide reading with appropriate use of source material and accurate referencing. >17 marks
Presentation and Academic Writing StandardsFailPassMeritDistinctionDistinction*Report Structure and PresentationThe presentation is poorly structured, incoherent and wholly descriptive work. References to sources are few or none. Presentation is acceptable, but attention to structure and style required. References to sources are included. Presentation is of a good standard but some shortcomings. The structure closely follows the style detailed in the Guide to Essay Writing, meeting some of the NCD submission requirements.Very good presentation. Content is wholly relevant and is coherently structured. The structure very closely follows the style detailed in the Guide to Essay Writing and meets most NCD submission requirements.Extremely good work, with presentation of a high standard. The structure follows the style detailed in the Guide to Essay Writing and fully meets NCD submission requirements.Research and referencing Limited evidence of appropriate reading and no critical thought. Little reference to practice. No external information considered. Referencing is either inconsistent, not to NCD Guidelines or not attempted.Some evidence of reading, although arguments lack coherence or are unsubstantiated by relevant source material. Some links to practice. Some reference to external information. Harvard referencing is attempted but is inconsistently used for in-text citations and/or Bibliographical and/or References listings.Contains some critical reflection and use of source material to illustrate points. Ideas are supported by appropriate literature referenced. Harvard referencing is used both for in-text citations and Bibliographical and/or References listings but either does not meet the NCD Guidance or is inconsistent.Good use of source materials which supports most points clearly. Integration of literature is accurately referenced. Harvard referencing for both for in-text citations and Bibliographical and/or References listings is to a high standard but not wholly accurate or does not meet the NCD Guidelines.Source material is used effectively to support arguments, ideas and solutions. Evidence of a breadth of reading that allows an in depth exploration of the theory, literature, accurately referenced. Harvard referencing is wholly accurate both for in-text citations and Bibliographical and/or References listings and in accordance with NCD Guidance.Spelling, punctuation and grammarPoor standard of spelling punctuation and grammar with little or no evidence of spell checking or proof reading.Several spelling, punctuation and/or grammatical errors which could have been minimised with proof reading and/or spell/grammar checking.A number of spelling, punctuation and/or grammar errors are evident throughout. Use of spell check tools and reading over your work may help identify errors prior to submission.Few if any spelling, punctuation and/or grammar errors.An extremely good standard of spelling, punctuation and grammar throughout.
Grade: CommentsOverall Performance: Strengths: Areas for improvement:
Get expert help for FdSc Supporting Innovation in Health and Social Care and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
The post FdSc Supporting Innovation in Health and Social Care appeared first on Universal Assignment.
