Task 1:
Assessment
Demonstrates excellent
safe practice knowledge for assessment. Explains clearly, succinctly and specifically how to conduct the relevant assessments and explains their relevance to the patient.
Demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of patient assessment. Rationales demonstrate satisfactory ability to conduct the relevant assessments and explain their relevance to the patient. Demonstrates a limited knowledge of assessment. Does not demonstrate safe practice, knowledge of the relevant assessments and/or explain their relevance to the patient.
Criterion:
Task 2: Care planning Develops individualised, comprehensive nursing care plan relevant to the case study using the clinical reasoning cycle. All rationale is referenced.
Demonstrates strong critical thinking skills.
Develops individualised, comprehensive nursing care plan relevant to the case study using the clinical reasoning cycle. Most rationale is referenced.
Demonstrates emerging critical thinking skills. Care plan has been completed using the clinical reasoning cycle, but it is not individualised or comprehensive. There is a discourse between the sections of the care plan. No critical thinking skills displayed.
Criterion:
Task 3: Discharge planning Demonstrates a highlevel ability to provide relevant and comprehensive patient education. Provides specific patient education discussing two topics with an implementation strategy.
Demonstrates a
satisfactory ability to provide relevant and comprehensive patient education; discussing two topics with an implementation strategy. Discussion lacks detail and/or is not person centred Poor interpretation of task or
Education is provided but it is not specific to the
patient. No implementation strategy is identified.
Criterion:
Task 4:
Medication
Provides excellent, relevant and specific discussion about medications. Side effects are discussed. Demonstrates strong critical thinking skills. IV fluid calculations and formula are correct.
Provides a satisfactory discussion about medications. Discussion is not specific. Side effects are discussed.
Demonstrates emerging critical thinking skills. IV fluid calculations are correct and/or some minor errors in formula.
Provides a limited discussion about medications. Side effects are not discussed and/or Discussion is not specific to the case study. No critical thinking skills displayed. IV fluid calculations are missing or incorrect.
Referencing 4-5
All ideas supported with in-text citations
and there is a complete and accurate reference
list.
No errors detected in CDU APA 7th format.
Referencing guidelines met. 2-3
Some ideas supported with in-text citations and there is a complete reference list.
A few errors detected in CDU APA 7th format.
Referencing guidelines met with errors. 0-1
Many references are
missing and there are
many errors in CDU APA
7TH format. Referencing guidelines not met.
Presentation 4-5
No errors with grammar, syntax, sentence and
paragraph structure.
Presentation guidelines met. 2-3
A large number of errors with grammar, syntax,
sentence and paragraph structure.
Presentation guidelines met with errors. 0-1 Many errors with grammar, syntax, sentence and paragraph structure.
Writing lacks cohesion.
Presentation guidelines not met.
