SOLUTION: APA@Conestoga Citations And References | My Assignment Tutor

SOC 2020 Group Project Essay Rubric 100% Exceeds Requirements75% Meets Requirements55% Minimal Requirements30% Approaching Minimal Requirements0 Failure to Meet RequirementsAPA@Conestoga Citations And References Page/10Consistent fully accurate use of APA@Conestoga in text citations throughout with no formatting errors – References page correctly formatted for APA@ConestogaComprehensive use of consistent and accurate APA@Conestoga in text citations and References page with only minor formatting errorsAttempt to use APA@Conestoga in text citations throughout and References page with no more than one major formatting issueAttempt to use APA@Conestoga in text citations throughout and References page with more than one major formatting issueAPA@Conestoga in text citations and or References page missing (may result in an academic offense)Comments:Assignment Directions/Format/5Followed all assignment directions with exceptional care.Followed all assignment directions with minimal formatting issues.Two assignment directions not followed though they do not interfere with coherence of submission.Two or more assignment directions not followed with coherence of submission beginning to be impacted.Assignment directions not followed. Submission cannot be followed due to significant disorganization.Comments:Writing/20– Writing shows exceptional attention to proof reading and editing with no errors – written with exceptional organization, clarity, logic and precision of expression– Writing shows evidence of proof reading and editing with minimal errors (no more than 3)– Writing shows minimal attention to editing and proof reading with multiple writing errors (4 or more) though coherence is not impacted– Writing shows minimal attention to editing and proof reading with multiple writing errors (6 or more) and coherence begins to be impactedSo many spelling and grammar errors as to significantly interfere with coherence. Comments:Question 1: Identify/10-Clearly identified a relevant social issue with specific details -exceptionally articulated, original and using own words and phrasing and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -masterful use of cited textbook and research -fully expanded beyond proposal using feedback -reached required length– Effectively identified relevant social issue with main details provided -effective use of cited textbook and research -evidence of expansion using proposal feedback -effective use of paraphrasing and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -reached required length– Social issue identified but some of the main details are missing -minimal use of cited research or textbook -minimal sense of responding to proposal feedback – Some reliance on long direct quotes – reached required length-Some sense of a social issue but content is vague and/or generic with unclear connections to course -major areas of proposal feedback neglected – use of materials /information to support points is incoherent or used sources beyond the assignment directions – may be too long or too short-No social issue identified or clearly not Canadian or not relevant to our course – no sense of responding to proposal feedback -no citations to textbook or research or reliance on cut and paste from other sources (may result in an academic offense)Comments:Question 2: Textbook/15-Shows both breadth and depth of connections to course themes/chapters that are creative, insightful and thorough. -exceptionally articulated, original and using own words and phrasing and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -impressive attention to applying proposal feedback -masterful use of cited textbook and research -reached required length-Direct and relevant connections to course themes/chapters and topics – evidence of applying proposal feedback -effective use of cited textbook and research -effective use of paraphrasing and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -reached required length-Cursory and surface level connections to course content -minimal attention to proposal feedback -minimal use of cited textbook and research – Some reliance on long direct quotes – reached required length-Connections to course content may be missing in areas and/or connections are incorrect/irrelevant or vague/generic -major areas of proposal feedback neglected – use of materials /information to support points is incoherent or used sources beyond the assignment directions – may be too long or too short-No connections made to our course -no application of proposal feedback -no citations to textbook or research -reliance on cut and paste from other sources (may result in an academic offense)Comments:Question 3: History/15Masterfully cited three or more relevant encyclopedia articles showing an impressive range of perspectives – impressive attention to proposal feedback -insightful reflections on change over time and connection between history and today -Research and answer exceptionally articulated, original and using own words and phrasing, with masterful integration of specific examples and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -reached required length– Effectively cited three relevant encyclopedia articles with some areas showing range of perspectives -effective application of proposal feedback -clear discussion of change over time and connection between history and today -evidence/ examples logically and effectively introduced throughout to answer question fully with effective use of paraphrasing and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -reached required length– Two encyclopedia articles cited though may not be fully relevant and with some reliance on one source -minimal evidence of attention to proposal feedback -some attention to change over time and connection between history and today but may be vague or generic in places -Some reliance on long direct quotes – evidence, sources and/or research may not be effectively introduced -reached required length– Less than two encyclopedia articles cited – Content is vague and/or generic with unclear connections to question and some sections may be missing – major areas of proposal feedback neglected -Use of materials /information to support points is incoherent or not relevant, and not focused on Canada – may be too long or too short-Encyclopedia research not cited – Reliance on cut and paste from other sources (may result in academic offense) – no evidence of attention to proposal feedbackComments:Question 4: Analysis/25– two relevant theoretical perspectives masterfully applied to insightfully analyse causes, effects and solutions – research expanded beyond proposal based on feedback -masterfully cited textbook and five or more recent and relevant research sources showing an impressive range of perspectives – Research and answer exceptionally articulated, original and using own words and phrasing, with masterful integration of specific examples and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -reached required length– two relevant theoretical perspectives effectively applied to fully analyse causes, effects and solutions – research expanded beyond proposal based on feedback -effectively cited textbook and four relevant and recent sources with some areas showing range of perspectives – evidence/ examples logically and effectively introduced throughout to answer question fully with effective use of paraphrasing and sparing use of appropriate direct quotes -reached required length– two theoretical perspectives applied to discuss causes, effects and solutions though may not be most relevant and/or sections may be generic or vague -textbook and three research sources cited though may not be recent or fully relevant and with some reliance on one source – some sense of application of proposal feedback – Some reliance on long direct quotes – evidence, sources and/or research may not be effectively introduced -reached required length– one theoretical perspective applied to discuss causes, effects and solutions – textbook and less than three research sources cited -major areas of proposal feedback neglected – Content is vague and/or generic with unclear connections to question – Use of materials /information to support points is incoherent or not relevant, not recent and not focused on Canada – may be too long or too short-no application of theoretical perspectives -Research, text and/or sources not cited – Reliance on cut and paste from other sources (may result in academic offense)Comments: