SWN003: Community and Policy Practice This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC Assessment Task 1 Assessment Task 1 Task overview Assessment name:Digital PosterTask description:You have been asked by your organisation to design a socially just, new community initiative for community change that is action oriented. You have also been tasked with delivering … Continue reading “SWN003: Community and Policy Practice | My Assignment Tutor”
SWN003: Community and Policy Practice This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC Assessment Task 1 Assessment Task 1 Task overview Assessment name:Digital PosterTask description:You have been asked by your organisation to design a socially just, new community initiative for community change that is action oriented. You have also been tasked with delivering your proposed project approach to the community as an online digital poster PDF. Part of the digital poster can include photovoice (imagery with narrative) and storyboard (poster format) modes to critically and creatively illustrate key parts of the community change initiative, that is: outlining the community problem for addressing, and community work principles and values, theories, methods as well as implementation challenges. The new initiative will be relevant to the target audience (the community) and informative and engaging to the community. The innovative approach will highlight the potential of your community initiative in bringing about social change, as well as capturing new insights to inspire increased community equity, belonging and solidarity. The format and technology for the delivery of your digital poster is a PDF format or video recorded 3-5min presentation (i.e., a recorded video), plus an embedded 750-word summary.Learning outcomes measured:Demonstrate policy literacy in the critical analysis of Australian welfare state foundations, political processes and community and policy landscapes.Explain policy as a contested space and demonstrate how to impact policy change through persuasive argument and change efforts.Use relevant methodologies to critically design, analyse and evaluate socially just change community and policy strategies, recommend solutions to inequities and understand impact on vulnerable groups.Interpret AASW professional standards and apply to the complexities of ethical practice in community and social policy processes. Due date:Sunday 18 April 2021 at 10.AMLength:750-word summaryWeighting:50%Individual/Group:IndividualAuthentic Assessment: Yes NoFormative/Summative:Formative and SummativeHow will I be assessed:7-point grading scale using a rubric Task details What you need to do:Read the Criterion Reference Assessment Sheet.Select a community work project to design a socially just, new community initiative for community change that is action oriented. Do initial background research on that topic. You are encouraged to choose a community work project topic relating to your work or other relevant experience.Select a medium to deliver your proposed project approach as a digital poster to the community. Options:online digital poster PDF with photovoice and embedded 750 word summary; ORvideo poster with voice recording and photovoice (3-5min with embedded 750 word summary) A storyboard format will assist you to scope the PDF or video poster. Refer below for an outline of the components and submission process for options a. or b. The digital poster must contain an outline of the community problem for addressing, and community work principles and values, theories, methods as well as implementation challenges. The new initiative will be relevant to the target audience (the community) and informative and engaging to the community. The innovative approach will highlight the potential of your community initiative in bringing about social change, as well as capturing new insights to inspire increased community equity, belonging and solidarity.Assessment formatting requirements:This assessment task must use the below guidelines to format each option. Use APA referencing.Resources needed to complete task: SWN003 Blackboard siteCite|Write Task details: Guidelines and Submission Choose one option only Option A – Online Digital Poster PDF ComponentsPlease use the following guidelines: Three or four A4 pages (any orientation or arrangement is allowed, and you can design them to flow directly from one sheet to the next, but you MUST use SEPARATE A4 sheets) compiled into a PDF.Included text should NOT be more than approximately 750 words (consider narrative text while balancing graphic communication)Use a hierarchy of text (labels, headers, a variety of sizes, etc.) to facilitate effective communication of your thoughtsEach page must include at least one graphic. E.g., you can source graphics from Creative Commons or Stock generic images that you find on the Internet or use photos that you took of locations, landscapes, equipment, community sites, or use photos that you took collaged together in Photoshop, etc. You CANNOT photograph people. It can be in colour or black and white or a combinationYou will need to determine the best medium with which to create your photovoice narrative and represent your significant images.Include a project title with your name, date, and page numbers somewhere on the FRONT of the sheets. You can be creative with this and incorporate this information into the overall design of the sheets.• Be creative and try to use the colour palette, fonts, layout, and overall imagery to reflect the images you’ve chosen and written narrative (photovoice)How to submit Online digital poster PDFSubmit to your unit coordinator You must include both text and graphics, but the exact way you do this is up to you. Compiled PDF (including coversheet) consisting of 3 or 4 A4 sheets (storyboard) described below. Ensure you have added credits to your images if you did not create them. Images can be either – original (photos/images you took – note do not take photos of people, only locations as in an empty playground, barren lot of land, garden project) or downloaded from the internet – in which you add a credit to the sources. E.g., Source: Photo by Jane Student, ‘Title. Year (if applicable). Once compiled: Access the Turnitin Submission link >>View/Complete Click on the Submit buttonGive the submission a title, select the correct file and click the Upload.Click Confirm.Click Return to Assignment listTo check successful submission, you will receive a text match % (if this is an option), and you are able to resubmit, view or download your paper.ALWAYS check your student email for the submission receipt.Option B – Digital Poster – Video PosterComponentsPlease use the following guidelines: Your digital video with narrative should be approximately 3 to 5 minutes long with an embedded 750 word narrative summary. It can include the following components:Voice-over (You can record with your own voice),Images, photos and/or video of community,Music (optional)Credits (source of music/images/videos unless created by you). A copyright/ licence statement at the end of your story if required. Images or videos can be either original photos and/or images videoed. Note Do not video or take photos of people as this requires permission. Only take photos or videos of locations, communities or equipment, as in an empty playground, buildings, barren lot of land, garden project or signage; OR an image downloaded from the Internet. Credits: please provide credits for all the materials that are not created by you. The format of sample credits should mention the name of the song and the musician(s) who created it. For example, if this music (http://ccmixter.org/files/snowflake/33628) from CCMixter was used as background music, the credits would be “In Peace (name of the song) by Snowflake (name of the musician) from CCMixer”. After you give credit to all the materials downloaded from Internet, you are required to add a copyright/licence statement at the very end of your video. You can apply a Creative Commons licence. In this case, you need to pick a licence and put the image at the end of the story. You can also retain all your copyrights. Here is a sample of the statement. “Except for works noted in the credits; the images, videos and text contained in VideoTitle are all created by FullName. © FullName 2021” IMPORTANT – Save your story as an .avi, or .mp4 file and upload it to Blackboard by the due date. DO NOT upload it as a WMV file. The Centre for Digital Storytelling in the USA is a good resource for example stories and training: http://storycenter.org For digital storytelling tutorials, go to: http://muse.union.edu/student_digital_learning_environments/2014/02/27/aggregating-your-resources-digital-story-telling-tutorial/ Sample Web-based Software Programs. You are free to use other programs or resources as you see fit. For sound recording and editing: http://audacity.sourceforge.net For royalty-free music: http://www.jamendo.com/en/welcome For video-editing: https://spark.adobe.com and https://snapseedforpc.orgHow to submit online digital poster – videoSubmit to your unit coordinator Two files are to be uploaded to Blackboard: One avi or mp4 file of Digital Poster with embedded 750 word summary (Please save your digital poster using the following filename: LAST NAME_SWN003_sem1_2021). Upload to BB unit homepage, Assessment 1 area – folder Assessment 1 digital poster video.One A4 page of the embedded 750 word summary script text with coversheet – your name, date, and unit coordinator name on it – to TurnItIn. (This helps in allocating grades and providing feedback). Moderation:All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare their judgements before marks or grades are finalised. Academic Integrity Students are expected to engage in learning and assessment at QUT with honesty, transparency and fairness. Maintaining academic integrity means upholding these principles and demonstrating valuable professional capabilities based on ethical foundations. Failure to maintain academic integrity can take many forms. It includes cheating in examinations, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, and submitting an assessment item completed by another person (e.g. contract cheating). It can also include providing your assessment to another entity, such as to a person or website. You are encouraged to make use of QUT’s learning support services, resources and tools to assure the academic integrity of your assessment. This includes the use of content matching software that may be available to assist with self-assessing your academic integrity as part of the assessment submission process. Further details of QUT’s approach to academic integrity are outlined in the Academic integrity policy and the Student Code of Conduct. Breaching QUT’s Academic integrity policy is regarded as student misconduct and can lead to the imposition of penalties ranging from a grade reduction to exclusion from QUT. SWN003 Community and Policy Practice Assessment Task Item 1 Online Digital Poster Student Name & No.: Result: Criteria7 – High Dist6 – Dist5 Credit4 – Pass3 – 1 Fail Critical knowledge in the design of a socially just community-based initiative relevant to a real-world practice context: Identified community change strategy from social justice position.Use of principles and values, theories and methods to illustrate the community change process.Articulation of potential of community initiative in bringing about social change using authoritative literature to support.Masterful and innovative critical knowledge demonstrated in the design of a socially just community-based initiative relevant to a real-world practice context: Accurately & succinctly identified community change strategy from social justice position.Sophisticated use of principles and values, theories and methods to illustrate the community change process.Exceptional articulation of potential of community initiative in bringing about social change using extensive authoritative literature.Innovative critical knowledge demonstrated in the design of a socially just community-based initiative relevant to a real-world practice context: Accurately identified community change strategy from social justice position.Insightful use of principles and values, theories and methods to illustrate the community change process.Highly effective articulation of potential of community initiative in bringing about social change using broad range of authoritative literature.Credible critical knowledge demonstrated in the design of a socially just community-based initiative relevant to a real-world practice context: Clearly identified community change strategy from social justice position.Effectively detailed use of principles and values, theories and methods to illustrate the community change process.Considered articulation of potential of community initiative in bringing about social change using credible range of authoritative literature.Adequate knowledge demonstrated in the design of a socially just community-based initiative relevant to a real-world practice context: Mostly clear identification of community change strategy from social justice position.Foundational detailing of principles and values, theories and methods to illustrate the community change process.Sufficient articulation of potential of community initiative in bringing about social change using a basic range of literature.Superficial or limited level of knowledge demonstrated in the design of a socially just community-based initiative relevant to a real-world practice context: Rudimentary community change strategy from social justice position.Fragmented detailing of principles and values, theories and methods to illustrate the community change process.Insufficient articulation of potential of community initiative in bringing about social change using limited/no range of literature. Critical analysis: The extent to which your community-based initiative demonstrates critical analysis and evaluation: Critical identification of implementation challenges in community change initiatives.Critical analysis of capacity to inspire community equity, belonging and solidarity, as well as contested space of community. Sophisticated and exceptional critical analysis and evaluation of community-based initiative: Thorough critical identification of implementation challenges in community change initiatives.Innovative analysis of capacity to inspire community equity, belonging and solidarity, as well as contested space of community. Insightful and nuanced critical analysis and evaluation of community-based initiative: Refined critical identification of implementation challenges in community change initiatives.Perceptive critical analysis of capacity to inspire community equity, belonging and solidarity, as well as contested space of community. Cohesive critical analysis and evaluation of community-based initiative: Credible critical identification of implementation challenges in community change initiatives.Plausible critical analysis of capacity to inspire community equity, belonging and solidarity, as well as contested space of community. Sufficient critical analysis with foundational insights of community-based initiative: Some adequate critical identification of implementation challenges in community change initiatives.Workable foundational critical analysis of capacity to inspire community equity, belonging and solidarity, as well as contested space of community. Rudimentary, superficial and/or limited attempt to analyse community-based initiative: Some/no identification of implementation challenges in community change initiatives.Limited/no response to meeting task requirements relevant to community equity, belonging and solidarity, as well as contested space of community. Written/digital literacy skills: Graphics used to communicate the significance of the social justice community initiative.Inclusion of 750 word narrative summary to communicate community initiative to target audience.Accuracy of language and referencing conventions (Grammar, spelling & punctuation).Exceptional written/digital literacy skills: Sophisticated and highly effective graphics used to communicate the significance of the social justice community initiative.Exceptional mastery of embedding 750 word narrative summary to communicate community initiative to target audience.Highly accurate use of language and referencing conventions (Grammar, spelling & punctuation).Excellent written/digital literacy skills: Highly effective graphics used to communicate the significance of the social justice community initiative.Astutely mastered the embedding 750 word narrative summary to communicate community initiative to target audience.Perceptive use of language and referencing conventions (Grammar, spelling & punctuation).Professional level written/digital literacy skills: Effective graphics used to communicate the significance of the social justice community initiative.Plausibly mastered the embedding of 750 word narrative summary to communicate community initiative to target audience.Mostly accurate use language and referencing conventions (Grammar, spelling & punctuation).Foundational level written/digital literacy skills: Adequate graphics used to communicate the significance of the social justice community initiative.Some basic mastery demonstrated in embedding the 750 word narrative summary to communicate community initiative to target audience.Foundational use language and referencing conventions (Grammatical, spelling & punctuation errors).Limited level written/digital literacy skills: Limited/no graphics used to communicate the significance of the social justice community initiative.Superficial/limited mastery demonstrated in embedding the 750 word narrative summary to communicate community initiative to target audience.Rudimentary use of written language and referencing conventions (Frequent grammatical, spelling & punctuation errors). Overall Weighting: 50%. Criteria are equally weighted. Marker: JM ¨Improve KNOWLEDGE of relevant theory and concepts ¨ Improve GRAPHIC COMMUNICATION SKILLS (focused on images included in story) ¨ Improve THINKING SKILLS through deeper reflection & greater effort. ¨ Improve WRITTEN COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Refine clarity and organisation of ideas within script) ¨ INCOMPLETE: missing components of digital place narrative ¨ BRIEF for assignment not answered; consult your tutor if you are unsure of what is required. ¨ Other Advice: Example Digital Poster Formats Note – Each example does not fully capture the whole assessment item description and instructions e.g. the specific task requirements you need to meet ie community initiative, design approach and theories. They are a guide only in terms of format. Online Digital Poster PDF Daring Participation – transforming institutionDownload the posterThe REACH pilot on institutional heritage analysed the implementation of participatory activities in museums, their significance and impact. Special attention was paid to the complex relationships between institution – audience – society and the (constantly) changing expectations of museums. On this basis, needs for action were derived in order to improve the room for manoeuvre of museums and to enhance their societal relevance and benefits. Large scale Cultural Heritage Ecosystem to create valorization strategies through a digital approach Download the posterIn our project we link Historical and Topographical Data to CH through an ICT ecosystem platform and we use an approach that entails Digital Humanities methodologies for collecting and managing information, as well as creating narratives improving the understanding of cultural layers. The same ecosystem is available for support participation through collecting other kind of data. The total lost of Nubia temples, the moving of the Nubians from their villages to new settings, the change of the agriculture production of the area provide an extreme case study. My Cultural Heritage. Young residents of small towns about their heritage. Download the posterSmall towns of Mazovian- Podlasie border, between Łomża and Białystok doubtless have multicultural history. In most of them was lived Catolics, Jews, Orthodox and Evangelics. They left traces on landscape and people remembrance. We should to ask people what they know about cultural heritage in places they are living – as a consequence, heritage left for them. Good way for asking is questionnaire addressed to adult, but still young people – high school graduates, study in four small towns schools (about 300 responders), who at least theoretically have unlimited access to knowledge on the Internet. Where they meet cultural heritage? Where they get knowledge? The answer to these questions will allow to find the right channels to popularize knowledge about cultural heritage in small communities. Organizing, promoting and enabling heritage re-use through inclusion , technology, access, governance and empowerment. Download the posterThe poster aims to provide an insight into the main focus of OpenHeritage, a new H2020 project – about to begin in June, 2018 – which aims at developing and testing an inclusive governance model and a supporting toolbox for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage assets. The project builds on the role of communities and the possibility of empowering them in the redevelopment process based on the concepts of heritage community and participatory culture. It operates with an open definition of heritage, not limited to listed assets but also involving those buildings, complexes, and spaces that have a symbolic or practical significance for local or trans-local heritage communities. Online Digital Poster – Video Tips on video making and example videos: DIY GuideUsing Video In Your Next Online Community Engagement ProjectExample 1Youtube Let’s change the story: Violence against women in AustraliaExample 2Youtube Shire of Augusta Margaret River Environmental Sustainability StrategyExample 3 Welcome VideoYoutube Let’s Talk Halton Hills This video from Halton Hills in Canada is a great example of how easy it is to cut together a video to welcome your community to your site. It encourages them to get involved and can be used as a promotional video to drive traffic.Example 4 The Explainer Youtube Let’s Talk Niagara Falls This video from Niagara Falls that seeks to explain benefits to the communities of becoming actively involved in consultations online. It is well produced, engaging to watch and is intended to motivate. Example 5 Follow on Youtube Operation Awesome Playgrounds Example 6 Youtube Community Service Video Beautify Sg Way Project Example 7 Youtube Stepping Up: The Social Justice ActivistExample 8Youtube Working together with communities Example 9Youtube Tomorrow: Empowered Communities Example 10 Missing an embedded written narrative and design featuresYoutube Palm Sunday 2018 Refugee Action Rally March Example 11 Missing an embedded written narrative and design featuresYoutube Palm Sunday 2018 Refugee Action Rally Speeches Example 12Youtube Balan’s story – an asylum seeker in western Sydney —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ASSIGNMENT 2 – SWN003: Community and Policy Practice This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Assessment Task 2 Assessment Task 2 Task overview Assessment name:Project (Applied)Task description:You will work as a project team to research, critically analyse and respond to a real world social problem or policy issue where social change needs to occur. Team members will use advanced level critical thinking to present their initial ideas in a performance presentation as a credible, authoritative and defensible case for a new initiative or a policy change that has maximum policy impact. Teams need to clearly communicate why the policy change needs to occur at this point in time. Student teams will then produce an appropriately formatted document for submission to a government ministerial office at the state, national, or global level.Learning outcomes measured:Demonstrate policy literacy in the critical analysis of Australian welfare state foundations, political processes and community and policy landscapes.Explain policy as a contested space and demonstrate how to impact policy change through persuasive argument and change efforts.Use relevant methodologies to critically design, analyse and evaluate socially just change community and policy strategies, recommend solutions to inequities and understand impact on vulnerable groups.Interpret AASW professional standards and apply to the complexities of ethical practice in community and social policy processes.Develop your capacity to work collaboratively, ethically, and respectfully towards achieving social justice, human rights, and progressive social change. Due date:Submission – Fri 04 June, 2021 at 23.59pmLength:2000 wordsWeighting:50%Individual/Group:Individual or GroupAuthentic Assessment: Yes NoFormative/Summative:Formative and SummativeHow will I be assessed:7-point grading scale using a rubric Task details What you need to do:Read the Essay Criterion Reference Assessment Sheet.You can work individually or self-organize into groups online and begin to explore your policy submission ideas and topics.Determine the topic of your policy submission about any area of social policy where you believe change needs to occur.Assume the role of a worker in a peak body, organisation or social work / human service student to craft and articulate a policy submission to a decision-maker of your choosing and position your policy approach.Conduct your topic research. Webinars will provide opportunities for feedback.Conduct further research and refinement if necessary.Use the Written Essay Guide to write your essay.Proofread your submission carefully.Submit your essay to Turnitin by the due date.Assessment formatting requirements:This assessment task must be formatted in the following way: 11-12 point font Double linespacing Use APA referencing, and be consistent with the style you use.Resources needed to complete task: SWN003 Blackboard siteCite|Write Submission information What you need to submit:One Adobe PDF document that contains the following items:Assignment coversheet.Essay with reference list.How to submit:Select Assessment 2 on BB for TurnitinAccess the Turnitin Submission link >>View/CompleteClick on the Submit buttonGive the submission a title, select the correct file and click the Upload.Click Confirm.Click Return to Assignment listTo check successful submission, you will receive a text match % (if this is an option), and you are able to resubmit, view or download your paper.ALWAYS check your student email for the submission receipt.Moderation:All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare their judgements before marks or grades are finalised. Academic Integrity Students are expected to engage in learning and assessment at QUT with honesty, transparency and fairness. Maintaining academic integrity means upholding these principles and demonstrating valuable professional capabilities based on ethical foundations. Failure to maintain academic integrity can take many forms. It includes cheating in examinations, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, and submitting an assessment item completed by another person (e.g. contract cheating). It can also include providing your assessment to another entity, such as to a person or website. You are encouraged to make use of QUT’s learning support services, resources and tools to assure the academic integrity of your assessment. This includes the use of content matching software that may be available to assist with self-assessing your academic integrity as part of the assessment submission process. Further details of QUT’s approach to academic integrity are outlined in the Academic integrity policy and the Student Code of Conduct. Breaching QUT’s Academic integrity policy is regarded as student misconduct and can lead to the imposition of penalties ranging from a grade reduction to exclusion from QUT. Written Essay – Policy Submission Guide Key headings to use/adapt as desiredWriting tipsCovering letter of introduction: state your contact details, what your agency does and connection to and authority in the policy area, issue or problem. The cover letter adds credibility.Note: the overall tone of writing is still as formal and critical as in an essay but presented in report style, as per key headings. Try to be persuasive in mostly everyday language and: Title Page: give a title/image to convey purposeExecutive Summary: this can be an abstract or brief overview of the entire submission and should include the key recommendation(s)Introduction/setting the scene: clearly state your objectives in writing the submission, why it is significant, what it will/will not cover, what is happening, changes required to improve current situationResearch/evidence base/body of submission: present the issues, giveinformation, facts, build the argument/case, consider case studies or using vignettes to bring life and colour to the textImplications and recommendations: your practical suggestions for actions and possible timescaleConclusion: brief summation of submission, could include a statement of position to reinforce your recommendations, the SMART test, beneficiaries, outcomes, potential broad costs/savingsReferences (for whole of work)Appendices (only if useful and referred to in text) Policy Submission Examples Senate Committee Submission (Federal)Policy Submission Newstart AdequacySenate Committee Submission (Federal)Peter Whiteford Newstart AdequacySenate Committee Submission (Federal)Soldatic Newstart AdequacyBrotherhood of St Laurence (Federal)Retirement income review to Treasury. List of policy submissions: https://www.bsl.org.au/advocacy/policy-submissions/Youth ActionList of policy submissions: http://www.youthaction.org.au/policies and Pre-budget NSW submission http://www.youthaction.org.au/201819_pre_budget_submission SWN003 | Community and Policy Practice | Assessment Task 2 – Policy Submission Rubric CriteriaHigh DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassMarginal FailLow FailNo EvidenceCriterion 1: Using Research to inform policy submission: Write your policy submission with a critical policy research/analysis component setting out key findings and also limitations of the research into the chosen policy area or social problem. Weighting: 20%Sophisticated ability to identify and critically summarise all the key research findings and outline all of the research relevant to the chosen social policy area and the recommendation(s).Critical ability to identify and critically summarise most of the key research findings and apply research relevant to the chosen social policy area or problem and the recommendation(s).Professional summary of some key research findings and identification of some of the limitations of the research relevant to the chosen social policy area and the recommendation(s).Foundational summary of research findings and identification of a few limitations of the research relevant to the chosen social policy area/problem and the recommendation(s).Limited identification of theory and research findings. Some attempt to outline policy problem and research relevant to the chosen social policy area and the recommendation(s).Limited evidence of addressing this criterion.No evidence of addressing this criterion.Criterion 2: The logic of the policy argument, recommendations and rationale: Outline the policy implications of the research, making recommendations in the case for policy change to address identified social issue or problem Weighting: 15% Comprehensive logic from problem to possible solution, outlining policy implications of research with exceptionally strong links to current government position in articulating the case for policy change addressing a social issue.Incisive outline of the policy logic from problem to possible solution with strong links to current government position and policy implications in arguing the case for policy change addressing a social issue. Appropriate integration of the problem and the solution in a logical fashion to draw out the policy implications of the research with some links to current government position and need for change. Partially developed foundational logic with limited policy implications of the research and one link to current government position. Adequate discussion of possible policy change but for most part, lacks persuasion and influence. Superficial logic between problem and solution. Rudimentary attempt to outline the policy implications of the research with no links to current government position and incomplete discussion of possible policy change. No persuasive writing used.Limited evidence of addressing this criterion.No evidence of addressing this criterion.Criterion 3: Write the submission in a clear and well-presented way throughout, citing sources appropriately: Overall style and clarity, structure of submission and quality/range of referencing of sources Weighting: 15%Sophisticated and highly engaging submission style; written expression is exceptionally clear, succinct and fluent; follows structure of a submission; no written errors; comprehensive and high-quality sources of reference cited correctly in text and in list of references.Highly effective submission style; written expression is strongly clear and is generally succinct; largely adheres to structure of a submission; minor errors evident; excellent quality sources of reference cited mainly correctly in text and in list of references.Professional ability to conform to a submission style; written expression is satisfactory; structure of submission is discernible; some written errors; adequate referencing.Sufficiently conformed to a submission style yet written expression is descriptive and/or difficult to read; lacks a coherent structure; multiple referencing errors; multiple written errors.Partially/not conformed to a submission style; functional written expression with descriptive elements and difficulties in structure; referencing errors or inaccurate; multiple errors noted that detract from strength of persuasive argument.Limited evidence of addressing this criterion.No evidence of addressing this criterion.
