Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

DEN301 – Virtual Systems and Services

DEN301 – Virtual Systems and Services
Assessment 2 – Group technical report
Overview
In this assessment, you need to demonstrate your understanding of managing different components
of virtualisation. Specifically, you need to produce a technical report addressing the requirements
listed below.
Important information
• Please include SISTC’s assessment cover page at the beginning of the submitted work
• This assessment weighs 40% of your final grade
• The due date of this assessment is Sunday 11pm Week 12
• Submitting your work late will attract a 10% reduction of mark for each day beyond the due
date. A delay of more than 5 days will result in being granted a 0
• The whole report should be 3000 words (+/- 10%) excluding personal reflection discussions
and references. You need to submit a word version of your report to Moodle.
• It is recommended that you plan time appropriately and start your assessment early which
will give you time to gain feedback from your lecturer
Only one of your group members needs to submit. Include all of your group members’ information on
the cover page.
Learning Outcomes Assessed
The following course learning outcomes are assessed by completing this assessment task:
LO1. Analyse the benefits of network and storage virtualisation is, and what benefits it can offer in
the provision of IT services;
LO3. Explore, in a practical way, and report on the services offered by one or more virtualisation
products;
LO4. Evaluate alternative virtualisation technologies that suit a given set of requirements;
LO5. Understand and evaluate requirements for effective Virtual Machine (VM) management;
LO6. Identify and evaluate the requirements to create and to manage a virtual infrastructure;
Assessment Specification
Embracing the trend of virtualisation, the CEO of SISTC consults with you on how to move the School’s
services to a virtualisation environment. Currently, SISTC aims to convert its three classes’ teaching
services, facility management service, staff management service, and finance service into a virtual
environment as a pilot experiment. Each of these services shall be converted to one individual virtual
machine. SISTC has already acquired a host server. The details are illustrated in the below table.
Table 1. The configuration of host server

OS CPU Memory Storage Switch enabled
Linux 16 CPU with quad
core
64GB 8TB

AssignmentTutorOnline

Regarding the current use and future system requirements, the CEO of SISTC has mentioned to you:
• The approximate ratios of these services are: each classes’ teaching service (20%, in total 60%),
facility management service (10%), staff management service (10%), and finance service
(20%).
• Finance service should be kept relatively separated from other services.
• The resource of host server is expected to be fully utilised to maximize the performance of the
virtual system.
Now, you need to produce a technical report to summarise your suggestions to configure and manage
these services in a virtual environment. The suggested report structure is as blow.
• Background
• Manage CPU
• Manage Memory
• Manage Storage
• Manage Network
• Manage Back-up
• Manage Additional Devices
• Conclusion
• Team contribution
• Reference
Background – In this section, you need to discuss the current problems of SISTC providing services in a
non-virtual manner. Then, you need to introduce at least two benefits for SISTC to use a virtualisation
solution. Finally, you need to introduce the objectives of your report and the structure of your report.
Manage CPU – In this section, you need to discuss the specific configurations of CPU for the individual
virtual machines (e.g., how many processors are configured in each individual virtual machine and why).
You need use tables/figures to help illustrate your design. You also need to provide suggestions to SISTC
on how they should manage CPU.
Manage Memory – In this section, you need to discuss the specific configurations of memory for the
individual virtual machines (e.g., how much memory is configured in each individual virtual machine
and why). You need use tables/figures to help illustrate your design. You also need to provide
suggestions to SISTC on how they should manage memory.
Manage Storage – In this section, you need to discuss the specific configurations of storage for the
individual virtual machines (e.g., how much memory is configured in each individual virtual machine
and why). You need use tables/figures to help illustrate your design. You also need to provide
suggestions to SISTC on how they should manage storage.
Manage Network – In this section, you need to discuss the specific configurations of networking design
(i.e., how different virtual machines are connected). You need use tables/figures to help illustrate your
design (an overview network design is mandatory). Please note that all types of network design in
virtual systems need to be used. You also need to provide suggestions to SISTC on how they should
manage network.
Manage Back-up – In this section, you need to discuss the back-up strategies for SISTC. You need to
provide at least two options for SISTC to back up the virtual systems and analyse their advantages and
disadvantages. You also need to provide suggestions to SISTC on how they should manage back-up.
Manage Additional Devices – In this section, you need to discuss at least two additional devices
required for SISTC’s virtual system. You will also need to provide relevant discussions on how to manage
these additional devices and provide suggestions to SISTC.
Conclusion – You need to summarise your report content.
Team contribution – Each of your group member needs to write a short paragraph about personal
reflect, that:
• explains your role within the team and what your contributions were to the assignment and
to your team (i.e., what parts of the assignment did you complete, what parts did you
review/provide feedback on)
• describes what you did to ensure that you worked efficiently individually and with your team
to create a cohesive report
• evaluates how efficiently the team worked together to complete the report
• explains each team member’s role in the team, how they worked with each other and what
they contributed to the team.
Reference – You need to provide reference if necessary, using APA format.
Marking Criteria / Rubric
Refer to the attached marking guide.
General Assessment Requirement
Incomprehensible submissions – Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate
their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to
be both clear and easy to understand. If not, SISTC cannot determine that students have demonstrated
their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential
for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.
Check with marking rubric: Before submitting your assessment, you should check it against the
assessment criteria and the marking rubric included in this specification to ensure that you have
satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your submission.
Feedback
Feedback will be supplied through Moodle.
Authoritative results will be published on Moodle.
Academic Misconduct
To submit your assessment task, you must indicate that you have read and understood, and comply
with, the Sydney International School of Technology and Commerce Academic Integrity and Student
Plagiarism policies and procedures.
You must also agree that your work has not been outsourced and is entirely your own except where
work quoted is duly acknowledged. Additionally, you must agree that your work has not been
submitted for assessment in any other course or program.
Assessment Marking Rubric:

Criteria Fail Pass Credit Distinction High
0 – 49% 50% – 64% 65% – 74% 75% – 84% 85% – 100%
Report content
(70%)
Background (10%) Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide the
background
discussions.
Problem
statements are
presented, but the
information is
poor.
Only one benefit is
clearly discussed,
but the discussions
are less accurate.
Objectives of
report are unclear.
Report structure is
unclear.
Problem
statements are
presented, but
problems are less
accurate to the
context.
Only one benefit is
clearly discussed.
Objectives of
report are
discussed but there
is some room to
improve.
Report structure is
introduced.
Problem
statements are
presented, but
problems are less
accurate to the
context.
At least two
benefits are
provided, but the
benefits are less
discussed.
Objectives of
report are clearly
presented.
Report structure is
clearly introduced.
Problem
statements are
clear and
reasonable.
At least two
benefits are
provided and
clearly discussed.
Objectives of
report are clearly
presented.
Report structure is
clearly introduced.
Manage CPU (10%) Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide discussions
on how to manage
CPU.
Configuration of
CPU has been
discussed but the
information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Configuration of
CPU has been
discussed but the
information is hard
to access.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information in
these tools is hard
to access.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
hard to access.
Configuration of
CPU is clear and
reasonable, but
there is some room
to improve.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
design of these
tools can be
improved.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but the suggestions
are less useful.
Configuration of
CPU is clear and
reasonable.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions and
these tools are well
designed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are
straightforward
and insightful.
Manage Memory
(10%)
Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide discussions
on how to manage
memory.
Configuration of
memory has been
discussed but the
information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Configuration of
memory has been
discussed but the
information is hard
to access.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information in
these tools is hard
to access.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
hard to access.
Configuration of
memory is clear
and reasonable,
but there is some
room to improve.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
design of these
tools can be
improved.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but the suggestions
are less useful.
Configuration of
memory is clear
and reasonable.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions and
these tools are well
designed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are
straightforward
and insightful.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Manage Storage
(10%)
Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide discussions
on how to manage
memory.
Configuration of
storage has been
discussed but the
information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Configuration of
storage has been
discussed but the
information is hard
to access.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information in
these tools is hard
to access.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
hard to access.
Configuration of
storage is clear and
reasonable, but
there is some room
to improve.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
design of these
tools can be
improved.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but the suggestions
are less useful.
Configuration of
storage is clear and
reasonable.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions and
these tools are well
designed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are
straightforward
and insightful.
Manage Network
(10%)
Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide discussions
on how to manage
network.
Configuration of
network has been
discussed but the
information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
The overview of
network design is
not provided.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Configuration of
network has been
discussed but the
information is hard
to access.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
information in
these tools is hard
to access.
The overview of
network design
needs some major
improvement.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
hard to access.
Configuration of
network is clear
and reasonable,
but there is some
room to improve.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions, but the
design of these
tools can be
improved.
The overview of
network is well
designed, but the
figure illustration
can be improved.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but the suggestions
are less useful.
Configuration of
network is clear
and reasonable.
Tables/figures are
used to support
discussions and
these tools are well
designed.
The overview of
network is well
designed and
illustrated in a
figure.
Suggestions to
SISTC are
straightforward
and insightful.
Manage Back-up
(10%)
Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide discussions
on how to manage
back-up.
Only one back-up
strategy is
discussed, but its
advantages and
disadvantages are
less mentioned.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
incorrect or less
Only one back-up
strategies as well
as its advantages
and disadvantages
are excellently
discussed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
hard to access.
At least two back
up strategies are
discussed, but their
advantages and
disadvantages are
less mentioned.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but the suggestions
are less useful.
At least two back
up strategies as
well as their
advantages and
disadvantages are
excellently
discussed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are
relevant to the
context.
straightforward
and insightful.
Manage Additional
Devices (10%)
Little or no efforts
have been
demonstrated to
provide discussions
on how to manage
additional devices.
Only one additional
device is discussed
but the discussion
is less relevant to
the context.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
incorrect or less
relevant to the
context.
Only one additional
device is
excellently
discussed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but information is
hard to access.
At least two
additional devices
are discussed but
the discussion is
less relevant to the
context.
Suggestions to
SISTC are provided,
but the suggestions
are less useful.
At least two
additional devices
are excellently
discussed.
Suggestions to
SISTC are
straightforward
and insightful.
Report format
(20%)
Writing to
audience (10%)
Too much use of
technical jargon. A
large number of
spelling,
punctuation or
grammatical errors.
Some over-use of
technical jargon.
Several spelling,
punctuation or
grammatical errors.
Appropriate use of
technical jargon.
Some spelling,
punctuation or
grammatical errors.
Appropriate use of
technical jargon.
No spelling,
punctuation or
grammatical errors.
Use of technical
jargon minimised
and defined when
necessary. No
spelling,
punctuation or
grammatical errors.
Clarity/Structure
of structure (10%)
The structure of
the report is
unclear and is not
logical. It does not
address the main
issues. Use of
headings and
charts
unsatisfactory.
The structure of
the report is clear
and logical in parts.
It addresses most
main issues. Use of
headings and
charts could have
been improved.
The structure of
the report is clear,
easy to read and
logical, directly
addressing most
main issues.
Suitable headings
used and some use
of graphics/charts.
The structure of
the report is clear,
easy to read and
logical, directly
addressing all main
issues. Suitable
headings used
throughout. Good
use of
graphics/charts.
The structure of
the report is clear,
easy to read and
logical, directly
addressing all main
issues and
providing other
relevant insights.
Suitable headers
used throughout.
Powerful use of
graphics/charts
Team contribution
(10%)
Team contribution
(10%)
Demonstrates little
to no effort
applied to working
efficiently
individually and in
a team.
Demonstrates a
limited ability to
work efficiently
individually and in
a team.
Demonstrates the
ability to work in a
somewhat efficient
manner individually
and in a team.
Demonstrates the
ability to work in a
very efficient
manner individually
and in a team.
Demonstrates the
ability to work in a
highly efficient
manner individually
and in a team.

CLAIM YOUR 30% OFF TODAY

X
Don`t copy text!
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
???? Hi, how can I help?