Federal Policy Analysis and Recommendations Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 10
Percentage of Course Grade: 25%.
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Analyze the social justice issue and its connection to the chosen population, including addressing cultural values, privilege, and power. (C2.GP.A)
13%
Does not identify the social justice issue and its connection to the chosen population, including addressing cultural values, privilege, and power.
Identifies but does not analyze the social justice issue and its connection to the chosen population, including addressing cultural values, privilege, and power.
Analyzes the social justice issue and its connection to the chosen population, including addressing cultural values, privilege, and power.
Analyzes the social justice issue and its connection to the chosen population, including addressing cultural values, privilege, and power, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Analyze the federal policy and its connection to the social justice problem and the targeted population. (C2.GP.A)
13%
Does not identify the federal policy and its connection to the social justice problem and the targeted population.
Identifies but does not analyze the federal policy and its connection to the social justice problem and the targeted population.
Analyzes the federal policy and its connection to the social justice problem and the targeted population.
Analyzes the federal policy and its connection to the social justice problem and the targeted population, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Analyze the historical issues and context leading up to and including the development of the policy. (C5.GP.C)
13%
Does not identify the historical issues and context leading up to and including the development of the policy.
Identifies but does not analyze the historical issues and context leading up to and including the development of the policy.
Analyzes the historical issues and context leading up to and including the development of the policy.
Analyzes the historical issues and context leading up to and including the development of the policy, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy, including addressing issues with policy design, implementation practices, and external constraints that inhibit effectiveness. (C5.GP.B)
13%
Does not describe the effectiveness of the policy.
Describes but does evaluate the effectiveness of the policy, including addressing issues with policy design, implementation practices, and external constraints that inhibit effectiveness.
Evaluates the effectiveness of the policy, including addressing issues with policy design, implementation practices, and external constraints that inhibit effectiveness.
Evaluates the effectiveness of the policy, including addressing issues with policy design, implementation practices, and external constraints that inhibit effectiveness, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Evaluate the feasibility of the policy from political, economic, and administrative perspectives. (C5.GP.C)
12%
Does not address the feasibility of the policy from political, economic, and administrative perspectives.
Makes some comments but does not evaluate the feasibility of the policy from political, economic, and administrative perspectives.
Evaluates the feasibility of the policy from political, economic, and administrative perspectives.
Evaluates the feasibility of the policy from political, economic, and administrative perspectives, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Draw conclusions about the continuing effectiveness of the policy. (C5.GP.B)
12%
Does not provide conclusions about the continuing effectiveness of the policy
The conclusions about the continuing effectiveness of the policy are not clearly stated or contain errors.
Draws conclusions about the continuing effectiveness of the policy.
Draws conclusions about the continuing effectiveness of the policy, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Provide recommendations to improve the policy or to replace it with alternative solutions, including a plan for advocacy and implementation. (C5.GP.C)
12%
Does not provide recommendations to improve the policy or to replace it with alternative solutions, including a plan for advocacy and implementation.
Provides only partially articulated recommendations to improve the policy or to replace it with alternative solutions, including a plan for advocacy and implementation.
Provides recommendations to improve the policy or to replace it with alternative solutions, including a plan for advocacy and implementation.
Provide recommendations to improve the policy or to replace it with alternative solutions, including a plan for advocacy and implementation, and uses outstanding details and examples to support the analysis.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
12%
Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
Inconsistently communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession; or, does not support the claims with at least eight scholarly sources.
Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession, referencing at least eight scholarly sources.
Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession, consistently and with no errors, referencing at least eight well chosen scholarly sources.
The post Federal Policy Analysis and Recommendations Scoring Guide Due Date: End of Unit appeared first on PapersSpot.
