TLTM 352 Week 2 Grading Rubric APUS Assignment Rubric Undergraduate Level 300-400

TLTM 352 Week 2 Grading Rubric

APUS Assignment

Rubric

Undergraduate Level

300-400

EXEMPLARY LEVEL

4

ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL

3

DEVELOPING LEVEL

2

BEGINNING LEVEL

1

TOTAL POINTS

FOCUS/THESIS- 10 points

Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of

the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the

assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the

assignment with well- documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.

Establishes a good comprehension of topic

and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with

most support statements helping to support the key

focus of assignment.

Student exhibits a basic understanding of the

intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis

helps to guide the development of the

assignment, the reader

may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has

limited the quality of the assignment.

Exhibits a limited understanding of the

assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key

themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly

evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of

supporting facts or

statements.

10

CONTENT/SUBJECT

KNOWLEDGE-20 points

Student demonstrates proficient command of the

subject matter in the

assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.

Student exhibits above average usage of subject

matter in assignment.

Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.

The assignment reveals that the student has a

general, fundamental

understanding of the

course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts

and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets

the minimum requirements in this area.

Student tries to explain some concepts, but

overlooks critical details.

Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation,

and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.

20

CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS-20 points

Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical

thinking necessary for 300-

400 level work. Learner provides a strategic

Student exhibits a good command of critical

thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting

Student takes a common, conventional approach in

guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in

Student demonstrates beginning understanding

of key concepts but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to

20

approach in presenting

examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well- supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.

statements. Assignment

demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions,

with 2 or fewer errors.

assignment. However,

student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.

apply information in a

problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.

ORGANIZATION OF

IDEAS/FORMAT-20 points

Student thoroughly

understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an

appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.

Student explains the

majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors.

Learner applies some

points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some

inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a

continuous pattern of logical sequencing..

Assignment reveals

formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area.

Student needs to review and revise the assignment.

20

WRITING CONVENTIONS

(GRAMMAR & MECHANICS)-15 points

Student demonstrates an excellent command of

grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough,

Student provides an effective display of good

writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage

Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but

more than 5 errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by

Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently

discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs

15

extensive understanding of

word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well- planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare

a high-quality academic assignment.

and present an above

average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements.

student. Student uses a

basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.

improvement, along with

numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment.

USE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY/

APPLICATIONS & RESEARH SKILL -15 points

Student provides a high- caliber, formatted assignment. Learner

exhibits excellent use of computer technology in the development of assignment. Quality and appropriateness of stated

references demonstrate the student’s ability to use technology to conduct applicable research. Given assignment includes appropriate word processing, spreadsheet and/or other computer applications as part of the final product. At least 2 references

Assignment presents an above-average use of formatting skills, with less

than 3 errors. Students has a good command of computer applications to format information and/or figures in an appropriate format. Student uses at least two types of computer applications to produce a quality assignment. Less than 2 references.

Student demonstrates a basic knowledge of computer applications.

Appearance of final assignment demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format and present data. Resources used in assignment are limited. Student may need to

obtain further help in the use of computer applications and Internet research. Less than 2 reference.

Student needs to

develop better formatting skills. The student may need to take additional training or obtain help from the Educator Help Desk while preparing an

assignment. Research

and resources presented in the assignment are limited. Student needs

to expand research scope. The number of formatting errors is not acceptable. No references

15

TOTAL POINTS

100.0

The post TLTM 352 Week 2 Grading Rubric APUS Assignment Rubric Undergraduate Level 300-400 appeared first on PapersSpot.

CLAIM YOUR 30% OFF TODAY

X
Don`t copy text!
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
???? Hi, how can I help?