10
Description of the SPP Goals
The SPP will be guided by three goals, with each goal outlining specific objectives focusing on preventing infertility or raising awareness about infertility as a public health problem in Kentucky. The SPP recognizes preventing infertility as a primary goal of the public health program. The first goal of the SPP aims at facilitating educational awareness about infertility in the region. The goal states, “By December 2021, we shall form a public health committee advocacy group to offer education on infertility, diagnose and finance the treatment of the patients based on a $ 300,000 budget to reduce the infertility rates in Kentucky 5% by 2023.” Specific objectives are instituted to ensure the effective achievement of this goal. According to the objectives, the Kentucky public health advocacy team will recruit 200 public health officers, health promotional officers, and community health workers to educate the public on the causes of infertility and mobilize them to be diagnosed and recommend them for medical intervention. Additionally, the movement will aim to reach 4000 couples living with infertility with the help of public health officials and community health workers by offering free education on the causes, prevention, and treatment of infertility. The SPP anticipates that by the end of November 2022, the awareness program will have reached over 10,000 couples with infertility in Kentucky and recommend them for diagnosis and treatment freely in partner hospitals.
The second goal aims to leverage partnering hospitals in diagnosing the target population. The goal states, “To diagnose over 15,000 men and women with infertility by April 2023 in various partner hospitals with the help of specialized gynecologists and recommend them for treatments in partner hospitals.” The SPP outlines specific objectives to facilitate the achievement of this goal per the set timelines. For example, the movement aims to diagnose the first phase of 5,000 patients living with infertility by screening and analyzing their infertility history by January 2023; and by August 2023, at least 15,000 patients with infertility to be enrolled for diverse treatment care free of charge in partner hospitals. Additionally, the SPP aims to have established the exact number of patients found with infertility to be at least at 10% by July 2023 and those found to be healthy to update the annual statistics of the prevalence of infertility in the region and the factors causing infertility in Kentucky.
Finally, the third goal of the SPP aims to foster treatment of infertility in the target region through collaborative efforts with the partnering healthcare facilities. The goal states, “By December 2023, we shall have treated over 20,000 patients with infertility in partner hospitals through surgery, semen insemination, and transplanting sperms into seminiferous tubules and recommended them to change their health behaviors.” The specific objectives guiding the goal will target to reduce the infertility rates among couples by at least 10% in Kentucky by December 2023 and maintain the infertility rates at 5% and below after 2023 through community monitoring and changed lifestyle behavior advised during the education program. Besides, having an established community counseling unit responsible for offering counseling sessions to 30 patients daily by January 2024 will provide post and pre-recovery sessions through permanent recruiting of at least ten gynecologists specialized in counseling therapy.
Logic Model for the Program
Inputs
Activities
Outcomes
Goals
Short-term
intermediate
Long-term
Personnel
Funding
Equipment
Supplies
Material
Partnerships
Space
Technology
Public awareness campaigns through educational programs.
Increase public awareness on risk factors of infertility
Community members engaged in more diagnosis practices and seek medical interventions on infertility
About 15,000 community members
enrolled for diverse
treatment care
Reduced number of infertile couples by at least 10%
Infertility rates maintained at 5% and below
Established a community counseling unit
responsible for offering counseling sessions to 30 patients daily
Improved quality of life in the community
Screening and analyzing infertility history.
Reduced stigmatization on infertility
Community diagnosis activities
Collaborative engagement with hospitals
Partnership programs with healthcare facilities
Active participation from community members.
The value of a logic model as a programming tool
The value of a logic model cannot be underestimated in the successful running of a health promotion program. According to the CDC (2018), the programming tool is the core component in representing the relationship between different program elements, such as resources, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts. The programming tool can explicitly help one see the relationship between the program’s activities and its anticipated effects. Additionally, Shakman & Rodriguez (2015) argued that the following crucial roles back the significance of the logic model. The model facilitates in bringing details to broad goals, clarifying assumptions, identifying the program’s logic gaps, promoting unanimity and building understanding, and explaining areas necessitating evaluation (including when) and describing the appropriate areas.
Fertman & Allensworth (2017) explain that the role of a logic model in providing a visual picture significantly helps in revealing the program’s crucial components and how they build on and rely on one another. One can clearly see how the program is planned to evolve across different phases, thereby enhancing efficiency in progress tracking. Therefore, a logic model plays an essential role as a programming tool for any health promotion program. It defines the program’s inputs, outcomes, and outputs at the inception phase of the program. The role essentially helps in facilitating the activities to flow smoothly into results. As a result, the stakeholders’ buy-in is enhanced and further augmented through the supporting evidence of each step’s elaborations and the explicitly stated timelines in completing each activity. The explicit elaboration of the planned activities depicts the logic of the health promotion program, thereby shaping the perceived success of the program. Moreover, Milstein & Chapel (2013) argue that a logic model helps the program’s implementers conceptualize how individually identified pieces befit into the larger program goals and objectives.
Program Budget
Category
Item
Subtotal
Amount
Program
Personnel
Wages and benefits
$100, 000
Consultants
$15,000
$115,000
Material and Supplies
Stationery items
$15,000
Posters and Billboards
$5,000
Health Education materials
$10,000
Basic office equipment
$40,000
$70,000
Direct Expenses
Travel expenses
$5,000
Meetings
$8,000
Service providers
$15,000
Accommodation for guests speakers
$5,000
$33,000
Services
Training for implementers
$15,000
Subscriptions
$15,000
Publications
$7,000
$37,000
Incentives
Program-based motivational prizes
$5,000
Grants to partnering hospitals
$10,000
$15,000
Miscellaneous
$30,000
$300,000
The value of using a budget as a programming tool
Budget as a programming tool plays a critical role in enhancing the project’s success because all procedures involved revolve around the project budgeting. It helps allocate resources and labor to ensure efficient and effective implementation of the activities as planned (Fertman & Allensworth, 2017). Budgeting helps the program managers to estimate the probable cost the community health program requires. Therefore, a budget plays a vital role in implementing, running, and accomplishing the goals and objectives of the program at the community level. For example, poor budgeting, lack of proper oversight, miscalculations, and poor judgment may lead to the project’s collapse. Therefore, the program manager needs to have a well-defined plan that aims to reduce cost, enhance saving, and identify areas that need more funding and labor to ensure efficient and effective service delivery. Having each project with a defined budget to guide its operation becomes easy to implement, evaluate, and hold the implementors accountable for any failure or delay. Budgeting also helps the project managers identify the funding sources, gaps, and recommendations for future planning of financing a project.
Project Timeline
Activity
Implementation Period
Dec
2021
Mar
2022
Jun
2022
Nov
2022
Jan
2023
Jul
2023
Aug
2023
Jan 2024
Recruiting a public health committee advocacy group
Recruiting public health officers, health promotional officers, and community health workers
Reaching couples living with infertility
Awareness on diagnosis and treatment
First-phase diagnosis: screening and analyzing infertility history
Evaluation
Enrollment for diverse treatment care
Final Monitoring and Evaluation
Explain the value of using a timeline as a programming tool
Fertman & Allensworth (2017) asserts that a timeline is an essential programming tool that ensures activities and people are well organized, activities are systematically prioritized, and most critical tasks are allocated adequate time, hence effective progression of the program. Therefore, a timeline provides the project managers with vital information that ensures punctuality in attending all activities. Fertman & Allensworth (2017) state that a timeline is essential in helping the individuals involved in the project to accurately keep time and deliver the services within the stipulated time. The planners should have a well-documented program calendar highlighting all essential activities in chronological order (date) and the program’s goals and objectives that need to be achieved within a specified time frame or by the end of the program.
According to the International Association of Project Management (2021), project directors and managers must understand that setting the time frame is essential in promoting the success of any project completion. Having a guiding timeline for any project helps the planners beat the deadline within the stipulated time and achieve their goals timely. Therefore, the timeline is a treasured programming tool by the project directors because it acts as their sense of direction in carrying out their activities. It serves as the guiding timetable that directs them from one step to another, leading to efficient and effective results.
References
Halder, A., Kumar, P., Jain, M., & Kalsi, A. K. (2017). Genomics: Tool to predict and prevent male infertility. Front Biosci (Schol Ed), 9, 448-508.
Fertman, C. I., & Allensworth, D. D. (Eds.). (2017). Health promotion programs: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 6, “Implementation Tools, Program Staff, and Budgets” (pp. 143-168)
Milstein, B., & Chapel, T. (2013). Developing a logic model or theory of change. Retrieved from https://cete.osu.edu/2015/02/02/using-logic-models-as-planning-and-evaluation-tools/
Moridi, A., Roozbeh, N., Yaghoobi, H., Soltani, S., Dashti, S., Shahrahmani, N., & Banaei, M. (2019). Etiology and risk factors associated with infertility. Int J Women’s Heal Reprod Sci, 7(3), 346-53.
Shakman, K., & Rodriguez, S. M. (2015). Logic models for program design, implementation, and evaluation: Workshop toolkit (REL 2015–057). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
The post 10 Description of the SPP Goals The SPP will be guided by appeared first on PapersSpot.
