Research “civil asset forfeiture” and “justice for all”. Define, discuss and describe both. • Beyond Mr. Oliver’s colorful language and anecdotal assertions, is civil asset forfeiture a good practice? Why or why not? • Make a persuasive argument either supporting or opposing civil asset forfeiture.
You must cite your work
Discuss equity/justice issues regarding law-enforcement’s financial self-interest in seizures resulting from cases of this kind. If you believe there aren’t any, cite research to support your position.
Does this practice violate any of our United States constitutional amendments? If so, which one(s)? Discuss how and why. If not, why not?
Has the United States Supreme Court recently weighed in on this practice? If so, how? Hint: it has :-).
Does recently published articles/data provide any indication/inclination of future trends associated with civil asset forfeiture, particularly given the enormous scrutiny police departments are experiencing?
Summarize your overarching positions concerning civil asset forfeiture and justice for all.
The post Research “civil asset forfeiture” and “justice for all”. Define, discuss and describe both appeared first on Essay Lane.
