SOLUTION: Scenario Critique: Sepsis | My Assignment Tutor

Assessment item 2 – Scenario Critique: Sepsis TASK (2200 words) Review the scenario provided (‘Mr Jason Swan’) and respond to the following questions in the body of an academic paper. This task also requires you to review the provided best practice guidelines, research and literature regarding the recognition, escalation and management of clinical deterioration (e.g. Clinical Excellence Commission ‘Clinical Emergency Response System’ – CERS). Additionally, incorporating further peer-reviewed journal articles to support your rationale will improve your grade further. Introduction (Recommended: up to 150 words) Provide a brief introduction to the concept of nursing care in the deteriorating patient. Introduce the context of your paper by highlighting the key aspects of the scenario provided.Outline the content of the body of your paper. Body (Recommended: up to 1900 words) 1. RECOGNISE: Critique the recognition of deterioration in the scenario Outline the specific clinical indicators of deterioration in the scenario and justify specific points in time when a clinical review and rapid response should have been triggered, based on the indicators that you have identified. Describe how the pathophysiological changes that occur with severe sepsis are linked to the clinical indicators of deterioration that you have outlined. 2. ESCALATE: Critique the escalation of deterioration in the scenario Critically analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the way the ISBAR clinical handover has been structured, and the content in each section of the ISBAR.Comment on the timeliness and adequacy of how the nurse escalated the care of the deteriorating patient in the scenario to other members of the interdisciplinary team. Justify at least two specific improvements that a nurse could make to the communication in the scenario to escalate a person with clinical deterioration. 3. MANAGE: Critique the management of deterioration in the scenario Critically analyse the nursing care in the scenario provided, outlining the strengths and missed opportunities evident. Justify at least two specific, evidence-based nursing assessments or interventions that were clinically indicated but omitted by nurses in the scenario. Conclusion (Recommended: up to 150 words) Summarise the key points that you have covered in your paperComment on the significance of this paper in relation to your learning about the recognition, escalation and management of the deteriorating patientDo not include new information in this section Reference List (not included in word count) Intext citations and headings are included in the word count for this assessment. The reference list, title page, and headers and footers are NOT included in the word count. MARKING CRITERIA Rubric AND STANDARDS Applies theoretical knowledge, critical thinking and best-evidence to interpret assessment data and critique the recognition of deterioration in the scenario. Most of the specific indicators of clinical deterioration have been outlined. Accurately justified most of the specific points in the scenario where a clinical review or rapid response should have been initiated, incorporating more subtle examples, based on best practice guidelines. Evaluated and synthesised sources to establish strong links between most clinical manifestations of sepsis evident in the scenario, and the underlying pathophysiology. (25 – 30 marks)2. Applies theoretical knowledge, critical thinking and best-evidence to critique the escalation of deterioration and communication the scenario Critically analysed most of the strengths and weaknesses of the structure and content of the ISBAR clinical handover with detailed rationales Commented on the nursing escalation to other members of the inter-disciplinary team with consistently rationalised, detailed and concise critique of how timely and appropriate this escalation was. Proposed several opportunities for improvement in communication within the interdisciplinary team have been justified Credible, reliable, authoritative and relevant sources have been synthesised to create a nuanced and authoritative critique (25 – 30 marks)3. Applies theoretical knowledge, critical thinking and best-evidence to critique the management of deterioration in the scenario. Critically analysed the nursing care in the scenario, outlining most of the strengths and weaknesses evident. Proposed several assessments and interventions that are appropriate, clear, well rationalised and prioritised in order of urgency. Sources have been evaluated and synthesised to form an authoritative critique of nursing management. (17 – 20 marks)4. Presentation Introduction provides a vivid contextualisation for the reader to the concept of clinical deterioration and the key elements of the task or the scenario. Submitted a paper with no more than 1-2 minor errors in spelling or punctuation. Sentence structure and paragraph structure are consistently correct throughout. The conclusion clearly summarises the key findings of the critique and the significance of the paper on the learning process, and does not introduce new information. (8.5 – 10 marks)5. APA 7th edition referencing style Use of citations consistent throughout to support your writing. Formatted your citations following APA referencing conventions for in-text citations, with no errors. Formatted your reference list following APA referencing conventions, with no errors. (8.5 – 10 marks)Academic Integrity Assessment will be submitted to TURNITIN by the Subject Coordinator. Students can submit their assignments to TURNITIN before uploading to EASTS. Turnitin report indicates a clear attempt has been made to adhere to academic integrity and referencing conventions, and avoid plagiarism. It is evident that the student has taken steps to show respect for and acknowledge others’ work appropriately, as per the CSU Academic Integrity Policy. SY Glossary of Terms Comment onState your views based on what you have read, researched by other means or learnt in lectures and tutorials.Critically analyseProvide an in depth examination of the strengths and weaknesses of the ideas/arguments in the assessment question/statement supported by evidence.DescribeProvide an account of; outline the features of an issue, event or process.JustifyGive reasons in support of conclusions drawn.OutlineProvide a general description or summary of the main features.SummariseBriefly outline the main features/arguments. Don’t include related details or examples