Accounting and Finance for Managers | My Assignment Tutor

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON Faculty of Business and Law MODULE NAME:     Accounting and Finance for Managers                                     Module CodeLevelCredit ValueModule LeaderACC3015620Chris Withers Green Assessment Brief   Assessment title:  AS1 Case Study Word count 2,400  Deadline:  Please refer to NILEWeighting:60% – please see NILE  Feedback and Grades due:  Please refer to NILE  Resit Date:  Please refer … Continue reading “Accounting and Finance for Managers | My Assignment Tutor”

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON Faculty of Business and Law MODULE NAME:     Accounting and Finance for Managers                                     Module CodeLevelCredit ValueModule LeaderACC3015620Chris Withers Green Assessment Brief   Assessment title:  AS1 Case Study Word count 2,400  Deadline:  Please refer to NILEWeighting:60% – please see NILE  Feedback and Grades due:  Please refer to NILE  Resit Date:  Please refer to NILE Please read this assessment brief in its entirety before starting work on it. The Assessment Task The case study consists of two sections- Section A consists of a maximum of 55 marks and Section B consists of maximum of 30 marks, both sections are to be completed. A total of 15 marks are available for presentation, detailed citation, referencing and good use of English in the assignment. Students are expected to read the case study thoroughly and to answer all the questions in a structured and organised manner with reference to published work. This is an individual assignment and it is worth 60% of the total module mark. SECTION A Question 1 Scenario: You hold the position of manager in your company. As a manager you have sound industry knowledge and commercial awareness. As part of your career development you have requested to be involved in a financial project to expand your managerial skills. You have volunteered to analyse the financial performance of the three companies identified in this case study over a period of 3 financial years (using the published financial data in the PDF file included with this case study). The companies have listings on the London Stock Exchange. You are required to undertake independent research to review current annual company reports, market reports and academic literature to support your findings in your report. Background:   “This statistic depicts the share of the soft drink market in the United Kingdom (UK) from 2015 to 2018, by category. In 2018, the largest share was held by carbonated drinks, accounting for 34.1 percent of the soft drink market, followed by juice drinks (23.6 percent). The market share of soft drink types in the United Kingdom is predominantly made up of carbonates, with the value of the market experiencing year on year increases. Levels of consumption, on the other hand, are decreasing…. the future of soft drink consumption remains uncertain. “ Wunsch, N.G. (2019) Consumer Goods and FMCG. Statista [online]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/422739/soft-drink-market-share-by-category-in-the-united-kingdom/ [ Accessed 5 August 2020]. You are required to: 1a.       Using the company websites, specifically the Investor’s area, and the annual “Chief Executive’s Strategic Review” identify the Strategic Plans for each company including the main financial goals and measurable success indicators in relation to financial growth, financial sustainability and financial performance. Having identified the key goals, explain the nature of the decisions i.e. long term or short term, and justify how these decisions will achieve the financial goals e.g. new investments, new products / services, increasing market share, restructuring etc. Clearly demonstrate how these decisions have impacted on the financial performance of the companies (use of evidence from ratio analysis will be required to support content). (15 marks) 1b.     Critically evaluate the performance of the three companies using the latest three years financial and non-financial data to reach a conclusion to clearly identify the ranking of performance i.e. 1st, 2nd and 3rd. To reach a conclusion on the performance of the companies you are required to select and analyse 10 appropriate financial ratios, ensuring the you cover all the categories of ratio, and 2 non-financial ratios to look in depth at each ratio result / finding, use supporting arguments and evidence for and against as well as how these findings interrelate to one another. Demonstrate your understanding of the findings by interpreting the performance and financial position of the three companies by commenting on any significant patterns and causal relationships.  Use of charts and tables is expected in your supporting argument. It is essential to establish the key facts and important issues surrounding the industry, selected companies and literature, you are therefore required to look at the audited financial statements and carry out further research to explain the performance of the companies over the three years. (30 Marks) 1c.       Using information and results from tasks 1 and 2 above, put forward a short case justifying the reasons why the best performing company (using the ranking result from task 2) would/ would not be a positive investment opportunity. In order to present a balanced argument, consider opinions which may run contrary to your own before stating your conclusion.                                                                                                         (10 marks) You are expected to research for more information on the companies and cite the material correctly. You can use the Orbis database to access analysts’ and SWOT reports. SECTION B Question 2 Most companies invest a significant amount of time and resources into trying to reach decisions on how to finance a business to achieving the optimum finance mix.  Finance decisions coupled with strategic planning, marketing and organisational design can be a critical aspect of the future success or failure of a business. Critically evaluate the internal and external long-term sources of finance available to one of the three companies in the case study in relation to working capital, cashflow and risk. Required You are required to prepare a memo on the topic of ‘Financing a Business’, addressing the following areas: 2a.       Using evidence from a range of sources, critically evaluate the main types of internal and external long-term finance available to listed companies, use numerical examples to help illustrate key aspects e.g. cost, risk, impact on cashflow and working capital. Reach a final conclusion, basing your decision on what you judge to be the most important factors and justify how you have made your choice. (20 Marks). 2b.       Select one source of long term finance used by one of the company’s in the case study, to explore how it affects the interests of existing stakeholders. Consider a variety of stakeholders’ viewpoints. Where possible reconcile opposing views by presenting a final line of argument. (10 Marks). . ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE All calculations must be detailed and presented clearly.Use of published work (citing references) within text is expected.A full list of references should be presented at the end of the case study.Please avoid the use of ‘I, We, Us’ in your case study. You are expected to write in third person.Include a Contents page, Appendices and Reference list.Your answer should not repeat the question as it will be included in your word count.Formatting:Font Type: Arial.Font size 11/12.Line spacing 1.5 to 2.All pages must be numberedAll graphs, charts and tables should have a number and a title.All text must be aligned to the left. Learning Outcomes The learning outcomes that are being assessed in this assignment are: Module Learning OutcomesOn successful completion of the module with limited guidance, students will be able to:Subject-Specific Knowledge, Understanding & ApplicationUnderstand and interpret the fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within business.Analyse, interpret and critically review more complex financial accounting information drawn from the current reporting environment.Appraise critically various principles of long term capital decisions, cost of capital, the time value of money, shareholder value and risk management.Employability & Changemaker SkillsCommunicate written and numerical information in an appropriate and effective manner.Review academic theory in a critical and reflective manner suitable for an academic audience. Your grade will depend on the extent to which you meet these learning outcomes in the way relevant for this assessment. Please see the grading rubric at the end of this assessment brief for further details of the criteria against which you will be assessed. Word Limits The maximum word limit for this assessment is 2,400 words. Section A maximum word limit 1,500 words. Section B maximum word limit 900 words. In accordance with the Assessment and Feedback Policy, as stated in section 4.40 where a submission exceeds the stipulated word limit by more than 10%, the submission will only be marked up to and including the additional 10%. Anything over this will not be included in the final grade for the assessment item. Abstracts, bibliographies, reference lists, appendices and footnotes are excluded from any word limit requirements. In line with section 4.41 of the same Policy, where a submission is notably under the word limit, the full submission will be marked on the extent to which the learning objectives have been met. Assessment Support Please refer to ACC3015STD NILE site, Term 2 weeks 21-25 for details of specific assignment support sessions and activities (subject to change). It is important that you attend all these sessions and access the Student Success Mentors for support, as a range of activities have been scheduled to support research techniques and referencing skills along with the opportunity to obtain formative feedback. All students studying at UoN campuses in Northampton will also receive an additional 6 hours of embedded academic skills development at each level of the programme of study. The skills sessions for BA Business and Management Top-up are included in the compulsory modules BUS3005 and BUS4002. Generic Grading Criteria You will find the generic grading criteria for achievement at  University Grading Criteria.  Also explained here are the meanings of the various G grades at the bottom of the grading scale. Assessment Submission To submit your work, please go to the ‘Submit your work’ area on the NILE site and use the relevant submission point to upload your report. The deadline for this is 11.59pm (UK local time) on the date of submission. Written work submitted to TURNITIN will be subject to anti-plagiarism detection software.  Turnitin checks student work for possible textual matches against internet available resources and its own proprietary database.  When you upload your work correctly to TURNITIN you will receive a receipt which is your record and proof of submission. If your assessment is not submitted to TURNITIN rather than a receipt you will see a green banner at the top of the screen that denotes successful submission. N.B Work emailed directly to your tutor will not be marked. The only exception to this is when you are instructed to do so because TURNITIN is down. Late submission of work For first sits, if an item of assessment is submitted late and an extension has not been granted, the following will apply: Within one week of the original deadline – work will be marked and returned with full feedback, and awarded a maximum bare pass grade.More than one week from original deadline – maximum grade achievable LG (L indicating late). Extensions The University of Northampton’s general policy with regard to extensions is to be supportive of students who have genuine difficulties, but not against pressures of work that could have reasonably been anticipated.  For full details please refer to the Extensions Policy.  The module leader can, where appropriate, authorise a short extension of up to two weeks from the original submission date for first sits only. Mitigating Circumstances For guidance on Mitigating circumstances please go to Mitigating Circumstances  where you will find detailed guidance on the policy as well as guidance and the form for making an application. Please note, however, that an application to defer an assessment on the grounds of mitigating circumstances should normally be made in advance of the submission deadline or examination date.  Plagiarism and Academic Integrity Unless this is a group assessment,the work you produce must be your own with work taken from any other source properly referenced and attributed. The University of Northampton policy will apply in all cases of copying, plagiarism or any other methods by which students have obtained (or attempted to obtain) an unfair advantage. If you are in any doubt about what constitutes plagiarism or any other infringement of academic integrity, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. For help with understanding academic integrity go to UNPAC  and follow the Top Tips for Good Academic Practice on the student hub. Please note that the penalties for copying work from another source without proper referencing are severe and can include failing the assessment, failing the module and expulsion from the university. Feedback and Grades These can be accessed through clicking on the Feedback and Grades tab on NILE. Feedback will be provided by a rubric with summary comments Criteria Grade / %No submission / no evidenceFailPassCommendedMeritDistinction   Work submitted is of no academic value / nothing submitted  Evidence included or provided but missing in some very important aspects.  Of satisfactory quality, demonstrating evidence of achieving the requirements of the learning outcomesOf sound quality, demonstrative which is sufficient and appropriate to the task or activityOf high quality, demonstrating evidence which is rigorous and convincing, appropriate to the task or activityOf very high quality, demonstrating evidence which is strong, robust and consistent, appropriate to the task or activity    Learning Outcome a)   Understand and interpret the fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within business. 15%              0 to 0 points Work submitted is of no academic value/ nothing submitted  1 to 4 points Evidence of some description of the of the key fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within a business i.e. how do you know whether the business has achieved the financial goals and the measurable success set out in the strategic plan in all its operations? e.g. solvency, maximising return, funding mix, growth and financial sustainability of operations, stakeholders. Interpretations put forward lacking clarity very limited support by evidence from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates poor understanding.5 to 6 points Evidence of some explanation of the of the key fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within a business i.e. how do you know whether the business has achieved the financial goals and the measurable success set out in the strategic plan in all its operations? e.g. solvency, maximising return, funding mix, benchmarking, growth and financial sustainability, stakeholders. Interpretations put forward are generally supported by evidence from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates a fair understanding.  7 to 8 points Evidence of some interpretation of the of the key fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within a business with some comparison between companies and industry i.e. how do you know whether the business has achieved the financial goals and the measurable success set out in the strategic plan in all its operations? e.g. solvency, maximising return, funding mix, benchmarking, growth and financial sustainability, stakeholders. Interpretations put forward are mostly relevant and supported by evidence from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates a good understanding. .9 to 10 points Evidence of clear interpretation of the of the key fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within a business with comparison between companies and industry i.e. how do you know whether the business has achieved the financial goals and the measurable success set out in the strategic plan in all its operations? e.g. solvency, maximising return, funding mix, growth and financial sustainability, stakeholders. Interpretations put forward are relevant and supported by evidence from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates a clear understanding11 to 15 points Evidence of clear interpretation directly related to the key fundamental concepts and principles which underpin internal operational decisions within a business with relevant comparisons between companies and industry i.e. how do you know whether the business has achieved the financial goals and the measurable success set out in the strategic plan in all its operations? e.g. solvency, maximising return, funding mix, growth and financial sustainability, stakeholders. Interpretations put forward are directly relevant and supported by evidence from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates an excellent understanding      Learning Outcome c)   Analyse, interpret and critically review more complex financial accounting information drawn from the current reporting environment. 40%          0 to 0 points Work submitted is of no academic value/ nothing submitted      1 to 12 points Incomplete selection of ratios lacking coverage of all categories of ratio. Choice of financial and non-financial ratios demonstrates lack of understanding. Presentation of financial and non-financial ratios for the past three years are incomplete or missing. There is some discussion but little or no meaningful analysis of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. There is some discussion but little or no meaningful interpretation of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. There is some discussion but little or no meaningful critical review of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. There is some discussion on the best performing company with limited content on the investment opportunity. Very limited support by evidence from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates poor understanding        13 to 16 points Complete and mostly relevant selection of ratios, coverage of all categories of ratio with some support by literature. Choice of financial and non-financial ratios demonstrates fair understanding. Presentation of all financial and all non-financial ratios for the past three years are mostly complete, including ranking. There is some explanation, lacking meaningful analysis of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. There is some explanation, lacking meaningful interpretation of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. Little or no implications of any changes in performance compared between companies. There is some review, lacking meaningful critical review of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. Little or no implications of any changes in performance compared between companies. There is some discussion on the best performing company with limited explanation on the investment opportunity. Some evidence of research from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature. Demonstrates fair understanding17 to 22 points Complete and relevant selection of ratios, coverage of all categories of ratio supported by literature. Choice of financial and non-financial ratios demonstrates good understanding. Presentation of all financial and all non-financial ratios for the past three years are complete, including ranking. There is some analysis of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. There is some interpretation of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. Some implications of any changes in performance compared between companies and industry benchmark. There is some critical review of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. Some implications of any changes in performance compared between companies and industry benchmark. Best performing company identified with some justification supporting the investment opportunity. Evidence of research from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature to support and justify some content. Demonstrates good understanding              23 to 27 points Complete and relevant selection of ratios, coverage of all categories of ratio supported by literature. Choice of financial and non-financial ratios demonstrates good understanding. Presentation of all financial and all non-financial ratios for the past three years are complete, including ranking. Analysis of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results. Interpretation of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results and with some use of industry benchmark. Implications of any changes in performance compared between companies and industry benchmark. Critical review of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results with some use of industry benchmark. Implications of any changes in performance compared between companies and industry benchmark. Best performing company identified with clear justification supporting the investment opportunity. Clear evidence of research from industry (annual reports, market reports) and literature to support and justify most content. Demonstrates clear understanding            28 to 40 points Well considered and relevant selection of ratios within the context of the companies and industry, coverage of all categories of ratio supported by literature. Choice of financial and non-financial ratios demonstrates strong understanding. Presentation of all financial and all non-financial ratios for the past three years are complete, including ranking. Clear and relevant analysis of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results and industry benchmark. Clear and relevant interpretation of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results and industry benchmark. Implications of any changes in performance compared between companies and industry benchmark. Critical review of trends and changes in performance based on ratio analysis results and industry benchmark. Implications of any changes in performance compared between companies and industry benchmark. Best performing company identified with sound justification and clear linkage to ratio analysis supporting the investment opportunity. Sound evidence of research of the current environment (annual reports, market reports) and literature to support and justify content. Demonstrates excellent understanding            Learning Outcome d)   Appraise critically various principles of long term capital decisions, cost of capital, the time value of money, shareholder value and risk management. 30%        0 to 0 points Work submitted is of no academic value/ nothing submitted  1 to 9 points Little, or no, meaningful explanation of the main sources of internal and external long-term finance available to listed companies, lacking use of case study examples or numeric examples to illustrate key aspects. Some discussion on how one clearly identified source of long term finance affects the interests of existing stakeholders, lacking coverage of investor interests. Demonstrates minimal knowledge of the assessment expectations. Demonstrates poor understanding.10 to12 points Some meaningful explanation of some of the main sources of internal and external long-term finance available to listed companies, some use of case study examples and numeric examples to illustrate key aspects. Some explanation as to how one clearly identified source of long term finance affects the interests of existing stakeholders, including some coverage of investor interests. Limited support from industry and literature. Demonstrates some understanding.  13 to 16 points Some meaningful appraisal of most of the main sources of internal and external long-term finance available to listed companies, good use of case study examples and numeric examples to illustrate key aspects. Some appraisal of how one clearly identified source of long term finance affects the interests of existing stakeholders, including some coverage of investor interests. Some support from industry and literature. Demonstrates good understanding.  17 to 20 points Some meaningful critical appraisal of all the main sources of internal and external long-term finance available to listed companies, good use of case study examples and numeric examples to illustrate key aspects. Some critical appraisal of how one clearly identified source of long term finance affects the interests of existing stakeholders, including some coverage of investor interests. Supported by evidence from industry and literature. Demonstrates very good understanding21 to 30 points Well considered and relevant critical appraisal of all the main sources of internal and external long-term finance available to listed companies, good use of case study examples and numeric examples to illustrate key aspects. Critical appraisal of how one clearly identified source of long term finance affects the interests of existing stakeholders, including some coverage of investor interests. Clearly supported by strong evidence from industry and literature. Demonstrates excellent understanding  Learning Outcome e)   Communicate written and numerical information in an appropriate and effective manner. 5%            0 to 0 points Work submitted is of no academic value/ nothing submitted  1 to 1 points Presentation is of a poor standard, some, or all, of the following were omitted; front page, contents page, list of figures, use of headings, appendix, reference page etc. Some tables and charts have been used which are either incomplete or not relevant to aiding understanding to audience.2 to 2 points Presentation is of a reasonable standard, most of the following were included; front page, contents page, list of figures, use of headings, appendix, reference page etc. Tables and charts have been used to display key aspects of the information and demonstrates a fair understanding of the audience and assessment requirements3 to 3 points Presentation is of a good standard, all the following were included; front page, contents page, list of figures, use of headings, appendix, reference page etc. Tables and charts have been used to display key aspects of the information and demonstrates a good understanding of the audience and assessment requirements4 to 4 points Presentation is of a very good standard, all the following were included; front page, contents page, list of figures, use of headings, appendix, reference page etc. Good selection of good quality tables and charts have been used clearly to display key aspects of the information and demonstrates a very good understanding of the audience and assessment requirements5 to 5 points Presentation is of an excellent standard, all the following were included; front page, contents page, list of figures, use of headings, appendix, reference page etc. Excellent selection of good quality tables and charts have been used clearly to display key aspects of the information and demonstrates a very good understanding of the audience and assessment requirements      Learning Outcome f)   Review academic theory in a critical and reflective manner suitable for an academic audience. 10%      0 to 0 points Work submitted is of no academic value/ nothing submitted  1 to 3 points Little or no academic or industry sources have been used or applied correctly. Little or no evidence of research. Poor command of academic / professional conventions appropriate to the discipline Standard of English is poor.4 to 4 points Few academic or industry sources have been used or applied correctly. Some use of case studies to support the discussion. Satisfactory command of academic / professional conventions appropriate to the discipline Standard of English is fair.5 to 5 points Some academic or industry sources have been used or applied correctly. Some use of case studies to support the discussion. Sound command of academic / professional conventions sufficient and appropriate to the discipline Standard of English is good.6 to 6 points A range of academic and industry sources have been applied correctly. Highly effective use of case studies to support the discussion. Rigorous command of academic / professional conventions appropriate to the discipline. Standard of English is very good.7 to 10 points A wide range of academic and industry sources have been applied correctly. Highly effective use of case studies to support the discussion. Authoritative command of academic / professional conventions appropriate to the discipline Standard of English is high.

Reference no: EM132069492

GET HELP WITH YOUR PAPERS

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments? We are here