Analyze how conventional wisdom, accepted beliefs, and/or established institutions are criticized in the Montpensier/Motteville correspondence and compare with the secondary source Montaigne. Consider not just the critique itself but how it is formulated, what enables it. Pay attention to form as well as the content.
Write a 3-page paper (double-spaced; 12 pt font; 1 inch margins) on the theme above. Develop a precise focus and argument– your first paragraph should end with a thesis stating what your paper will show or prove. Build your analysis around 2 or 3 concrete examples that best illustrate your key point(s). And try to illuminate something about your topic and your text(s) that isn’t obvious from a quick reading. Don’t merely summarize what the text says.
While framing your analysis around the primary text, consider again the historical context.
Assignment Instrcuction_P2
APA
CLICK HERE FOR FURTHER ASSISTANCE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT
The post Analyze how conventional wisdom, accepted beliefs, and/or established institutions are criticized in the Montpensier/Motteville correspondence and compare with the secondary source Montaigne. Consider not just the critique itself but how it is formulated, what enables it. Pay attention to form as well as the content. appeared first on Apax Researchers.
