GET HELP AT https://essaylink.net/order
Clinical Issues PICO Worksheet
Final Individual Paper [in 4 sections]
EBP Project Part I: Clinical Issues PICO Worksheet – [due Week 4]
Guidelines:
Page Length: Clinical Issues PICO Worksheet (Not including title page and references).
Content of this section should include:
Title page
Clearly stated importance of topic
Clearly stated PICO(S) question guiding the project
Reference list (If needed)
For Elderly patient (P) does the use of covid 19 vaccine (I) reduce the future risk of covid infection/covid pneumonia (O) compared with patient who not received the vaccine(C) ?
Please modify in proper language or give me another idea, please state in PICO format
PICO is a clinical research question that assists in the decision-making process in evidence-based practice (EBP). It is a specific, foreground question composed of elements that form an acronym. The P stands for patient/population/problem, the I stands for intervention or exposure, the C stands for comparison (standard of care, another intervention, or control/placebo group), and the O stands for outcome (which should be something measurable if possible). Though optional, T for time can also be included as an element of your question if your topic or research allows.
Grading Rubric PART I: PICO(S) Question
Criteria Weight Rating* Points Earned/Comments
Important of topic clearly stated and correctly formatted. 5
PICOT question clearly stated and correctly formatted. 5
APA Format (title page, citations, reference page) 2.5
Writing mechanics – appropriate grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity and professional style of writing. Appropriate page length. 2.5
Total points _____/15
*Rating: 5 – Complete, well-developed, successfully accomplished.
4 – Mostly accomplished, with minimal errors.
3 – Somewhat accomplished, with substantial errors.
2 – Attempted, lacks depth or clarity, substantial errors present.
0 – Not attempted.
EBP Project Part II: Introduction and Revised PICO(S) Question [due Week 5]
Guidelines:
Page length: 1-2 pages (Excluding Title Page, Part I, and References)
Content of this section should include:
Title page
Description of the research topic and background information
Significance of the topic to nursing practice
Purpose of the EBP project
Part I with Revisions Highlighted
Reference list
Grading Rubric PART II: Introduction & PICO(S) Question
Criteria Weight Rating* Points Earned/Comments
Description and background of clinical topic 5
Significance of topic to nursing practice and statement of purpose 5
PICO(S) question clearly stated and correctly formatted. 5
APA Format (title page, citations, reference page) 2.5
Writing mechanics – appropriate grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity and professional style of writing. Appropriate page length. 2.5
Total points _____/20
*Rating: 5 – Complete, well-developed, successfully accomplished.
4 – Mostly accomplished, with minimal errors.
3 – Somewhat accomplished, with substantial errors.
2 – Attempted, lacks depth or clarity, substantial errors present.
0 – Not attempted.
EBP Project Part III: Presentation of a PICO Project with Literature Review –
[Due Week 6]
Guidelines:
Page length: 2-4 Pages
(Excluding Title page, Parts I & II and References)
Summarize at minimum eight research articles, which meet the following criteria:
Original research studies, preferably published from 2010 to the present.
At least six of the eight studies should be quantitative
Two studies should be qualitative.
Variations from these criteria must be approved in advance by the instructor.
Content of this section should include:
Title Page
Part I (already revised)
Part II with revisions highlighted
Completion of the provided Literature Summary Table with Columns identifying each of the following items for all eight research articles:
Authors, Title, Publication Date
Problem
Purpose
Sample
Data Collection Method
Major Findings/Conclusions for Quantitative Research or Key Findings/Themes for Qualitative Research
References (updated, if necessary)
Grading Rubric: Summary & Critique of Research Articles
Criteria Weight Ranking* Pointed Earned/Comments
Description of the research problem and purpose of each original research article 2.5
Description of the research methods for each original research article 5
Summary of the major finding and conclusions for each original research article 5
Followed criteria for original research article selection 1.25
APA Format (title page, citations, reference page) 2.5
Writing mechanics – appropriate grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity and professional style of writing. Page length appropriate 2.5
Revisions to Parts I & II successfully completed and highlighted 1.25
Total points _____/20
*Rating: 5 – Complete, well-developed, successfully accomplished.
4 – Mostly accomplished, with minimal errors.
3 – Somewhat accomplished, with substantial errors.
2 – Attempted, lacks depth or clarity, substantial errors present.
0 – Not attempted.
EBP Project Part IV: Discussion and Conclusion [Due Week 7]
Guidelines: Page Length: Approximately 2-3 pages (excluding Title Page, Parts I, II, & III References)
Content of this section should include:
Title page
Part I (already revised)
Part II (already revised)
Part III (already revised
Part IV (with revisions highlighted).
Describe similarities and differences among the four studies.
Discuss the practical or clinical significance of the findings to the evidence-based practice of nursing.
Provide an answer to the PICOT question, or describe why you are not able to definitively answer the question.
References (updated, if necessary).
Grading Rubric Part IV: Discussion & Conclusions
Criteria Weight Ranking* Earned Points/Comments
Describe similarities and differences among four studies 5
Describe the clinical and practical significance of the finding to nursing practice 7.5
Provide an answer to the PICOT question or a rationale for why you are unable to answer the question 5
APA Format (title page, citations, reference page) 2.5
Writing mechanics – appropriate grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity and professional style of writing. Page length appropriate 2.5
Revisions to Parts I-IV successfully completed and highlighted 2.5
Total points _____/25
*Rating: 5 – Complete, well-developed, successfully accomplished.
4 – Mostly accomplished, with minimal errors.
3 – Somewhat accomplished, with substantial errors.
2 – Attempted, lacks depth or clarity, substantial errors present.
0 – Not attempted.
GET HELP AT https://essaylink.net/order
