Description/Paper Instructions
Wired network model using OMNET++ simulation tool
Learning Goal: I’m working on a networking project and need support to help me learn. Wired network model using OMNET++ simulation tool
Your task is to develop a wired network model using OMNET++ simulation tool.
Consider a Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) backbone switch connected to several Ethernet
switches (also called subnet). Let us suppose that one subnet can support up to 15
nodes (for optimum performance). So, if you are simulating a network with 60 nodes,
your network model should have 4 subnets linked to a GbE backbone. Wired network model using OMNET++ simulation tool
Simulation parameters:
• Number of nodes/clients: 60
• Simulation time: 3600 Sec (longer required for Video streaming)
• Traffic type: Video streaming
• Packet type: UDP packet
• Performance metrics:
(a) Video Throughput;
(b) Video end-to-end delays;
(c) Video packet losses.
[Hint: Video streaming uses UDP transport layer protocol, and hence UDPVideoStreamCli,
UDPVideoStreamSvr can be used for video client and video Server, respectively
=======
Final deliverable:
1. Analyze the results (including model validation) and write your report (4-6 pages) by
summarising your research findings. Hint: You can draw several graphs including the
number of clients versus video throughput, end-to-end delays, and packet losses. . Wired network model using OMNET++ simulation tool
2. Explain step by step on how you design the OMNET++ Simulation
3. Submit the OMNET++ project file
For more detail, please take a look at the attached .PDF file below
Requirements: 4000
Wired network model using OMNET++ simulation tool
|
RUBRIC |
|||
|
Excellent Quality |
Introduction |
Literature Support |
Methodology |
| 95-100% |
The context and significance of the problem, as well as a clear statement of the research purpose, are provided. The history of searches is mentioned. |
The context and significance of the problem, as well as a clear statement of the research purpose, are provided. The history of searches is mentioned. |
The content is organized well, with titles for each slide and bulleted rankings to group related material as required. Excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, and so on to improve readability and presentation content. The length requirement of 10 slides/pages or less has been met. |
|
60-85% |
More depth/detail is required for the background as well as significance, or the research detail will be unclear. There is no search history evidence given. |
There is a review of relevant theoretical literature, but there is little integration of research into problem-related concepts. The review is only partly focused and organized. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the information presented is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
The content is rather organized, but there is no discernible structure. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, and so on can sometimes detract from the presentation content. It is possible that the length requirements will not be met. |
|
30-55% |
The context and/or significance are lacking. There is no search history information provided. |
There is a review of appropriate theories literature, but no integration of studies into problem-related concepts. The review is only partly focused and organized. The summary of information presented does not include supporting or opposing research. There is no biblical integration in the conclusion. |
There is no logical or clear organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of font, coloring, graphics, effects, and so on frequently detracts from the presentation content. It is possible that the length requirements will not be met. |
