TASK DESCRIPTION – AMAZON Case Study
Essay Question:
Businesses employ a number of strategies to gain a competitive advantage over their competitors. Many times the outcome is influenced by the strategies of their competitors, changes in the business environment and the ability of the leadership to influence the businesses’ strategy and response. There is also the increasing importance of CSR is also influencing businesses like never seen before.
Assessment Task Description: Include a word count/breakdown for each task.
For this assignment, you are required to select any company from the list given below (Focus only on their UK operations) and perform the following tasks.
Sainsburys
Waitrose
Tesco
Asda
Perform a PESTEL analysis for chosen business.
From the analysis in task 1, in your opinion, evaluate how the changes in PESTEL factors has influenced the Opportunities and Threats business. Critically comment on how the business is addressing their Strengths to negate Threats and Weakness affecting their Opportunities.
Based on the analysis of the PESTEL factors, identify any two leadership styles that will suit the business, and two leadership styles that will not suit them. Your answer should provide relevant theory and use of literature.
The second part of the assignment will involve writing a reflection report on your experience in writing this report. In this you will reflect on the knowledge you gained from your research and how it benefitted in applying the theories to the practical framework of the chosen organisation. Suggest a reflective model to use, or offer a selection?
Hire A Writer – Plagiarism-Free Essay Writing Service
This assessment addresses.
LO1: Understand the dynamic and changing nature of business and the consideration of the future of organisations within the global business environment.
LO2: Identify the need for individuals and organisations to manage responsibly and sustainably and behave ethically in relation to social, cultural, economic and environmental issues.
LO3: Discuss leadership, management and development of people.
LO4: Discuss the development of appropriate policies and strategies within a changing environment to meet stakeholder interests.
LO5: Discuss the design and development of organisations.
Length Required
Minimum 2500 to maximum 3000 words. (Including reflection report)
Formatting and Report
Please note the following when completing your written assignment:
Writing: Written in English in an appropriate business/academic style
Focus: Focus only on the tasks set in the assignment.
Length: Minimum 2500 to maximum 3000 words (Including reflection report)
Document format: Individual Report
Ensure a clear title, course, and Student ID number is on a cover sheet and a citations and reference list using Harvard Referencing Style throughout is also provided.
Research: Research should use reliable and relevant sources of information e.g. academic books and journals that have been peer reviewed. You are expected to have a minimum of FIVE different sources referenced.
Hire A Writer – Plagiarism-Free Essay Writing Service
LEVEL 3 INDICATIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
An outstanding Distinction
90 – 100
Work which fulfils all the criteria of the grade below, but at an exceptional standard.
A very strong distinction
80 – 89
Work of distinguished quality which is based on a rigorous and broad knowledge base, and demonstrating sustained ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate and interpret concepts, principles and data within field of study, using defined principles, techniques and/or standard formats and applications. This will form the basis for the development of sound arguments and judgements appropriate to the field of study/ assessment task. There will be strong evidence of competence across a range of specialised skills, using them to plan, develop and evaluate problem solving strategies, and of the capability to operate autonomously and self-evaluate with guidance in varied structured contexts. Outputs will be communicated effectively, accurately and reliably.
A clear Distinction
71 – 79
Work of very good quality which displays most but not all of the criteria for the grade above.
A Distinction
70
Work of highly commendable quality which clearly fulfils the criteria for the grade below, but shows a greater degree of capability in relevant intellectual/subject/key skills.
A very strong Merit
67 – 69
Work of commendable quality based on a strong factual/conceptual knowledge base for the field of study, including an assured grasp of concepts and principles, together with effective deployment of skills relevant to the discipline and assessment task. There will be clear evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and application, and the ability to work effectively within defined guidelines to meet defined objectives. There will be consistent evidence of capability in all relevant subject based and key skills, including the ability to self-evaluate and work autonomously under guidance and to use effectively specified standard techniques in appropriate contexts.
A strong merit
64 – 66
Work of good quality which contains most, but not all of the characteristics of the grade above.
A clear Merit
61 – 63
Work which clearly fulfils all the criteria of the grade below, but shows a greater degree of capability in relevant intellectual/subject/key skills.
Merit
60
Work of sound quality based on a firm factual/ conceptual knowledge base for the field of study, demonstrating a good grasp of relevant principles/concepts, together with the ability to organise and communicate effectively. The work may be rather standard, but will be mostly accurate and provide some evidence of the ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate and apply standard methods/techniques, under guidance. There will be no serious omissions or inaccuracies. There will be good evidence of ability to take responsibility for own learning, to operate with limited autonomy in predictable defined contexts, selecting and using relevant techniques, and to demonstrate competence in relevant key skills.
