Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts (on different days) using the Annoto feature to post at least 2 Annoto comments per colleague video explaining why you agree or disagree with at least two elements of their videos (other than the title slide and references slide(s)).

Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (at least 50 words minimum per comment), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive.

SOLUTION

Response to Colleague 1 – Annoto Comment 1

I agree with your point about the importance of distinguishing anemia of chronic disease from iron-deficiency anemia. You clearly explained the diagnostic role of ferritin, TIBC, and transferrin saturation. This aligns with KDIGO guidelines, which emphasize evaluating iron status before starting erythropoietin therapy (KDIGO, 2012). Your explanation makes the diagnostic process very clear and clinically practical.

Reference:
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Anemia Work Group. (2012). KDIGO clinical practice guideline for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International Supplements, 2(4), 279–335. Annatto video comments appeared first on Skilled Papers.