ECOCB/535 Competency 3 – Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: The Digital Economy
Competency Assessment Title: International Trade Evaluations and World Economies Comparison Presentation
Total Number of Points: 100
Assignment Directions:
Congratulations, your consulting business continues to thrive. You have been tasked with developing a two-part presentation to generate important discussion around international trade and world economies to help interns apply their understanding.
Create a presentation incorporating the following:
Part 1: International Trade
Review the Competency 3 Resources: Exchange Across International Borders.
Prepare a 12- to 16-slide (of the two-part presentation) with detailed speaker’s notes and visual elements, including graphs and tables.
Complete the following in your presentation:
Choose a pair of economies from the bulleted list below, (each pair has 1 highly successful country and 1 less successful country, except for NAFTA /EU):
- NAFTA vs. European Union (world’s two largest economic entities)
- China vs. India (world’s two most populous countries)
- South Korea vs. North Korea (two polar economic opposites, one people)
- Venezuela vs. Saudi Arabia (world’s two largest sources of oil reserves)
- Nigeria vs. Democratic Republic of the Congo (functioning government and civil order vs. struggling government and violent clashes among factions; note: the Republic of the Congo is not the same country as the Democratic Republic of the Congo)
Research the economies for your chosen pair of countries. Compare similarities and differences between your chosen countries/economies and explain how their economic, political, and cultural development since 1992 has influenced their economic growth and trade competitiveness.
Use tables or graphs to support your analysis of the following economic statistics/indicators of your 2 chosen economies through the most recent year available since 2009 (the trough of the last economic cycle):
- GDP per capita growth over time
- Inflation rate over time
- Unemployment rate over time
- Exports as a percentage of GDP over time
Copyright© 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
- National government debt as a percentage of GDP
Whenever possible, plot the metric for both economies on the same chart.
Evaluate the reasons why the economic growth of the 2 economies/countries varied. Discuss how international trade influenced the strength of each economy.
Discuss the role of value chains and value-added production.
Analyze how the failure to use value-added trade measures distorts trade statistics.
Examine at least 2 industries that have provided each economy a comparative advantage in world trade.
Cite at least 2 academically credible sources.
Part 2: World Economies
Promoting international trade is not a zero-sum game. It is a win-win proposition; both parties gain from trade.
Consider the following.
- Tariffs are paid by the citizens of the country imposing tariffs, not by the citizens of the country producing the products upon which the tariffs are levied.
- The term “trade deficits” is a misnomer. Every country’s trade is always in balance.
- Trade deficits do not mean the United States no longer produces anything to export. The United States is the world’s second largest manufacturer and the world’s second largest exporter of manufactured goods.
- Trade deficits reflect a strong economy. Trade deficits rise during economic expansions and fall during economic contractions. Unemployment falls as trade deficits rise and rises as trade deficits fall.
- Imports and exports are complements, not competitors. Both are necessary and both contribute to economic growth.
- There is a strong correlation between the rise in world trade and: o The rise in world GDP
o The dramatic fall in the world’s extreme poverty rate o The rise in world life expectancy
- Those 7 jobs cannot be brought back from overseas because they never left the United States.
Prepare a 6- to 8-slides to evaluate credible economists’ unbiased opinions on the benefits, costs, and results of current U.S. trade and tariff policies.
Include detailed speaker notes and visual elements, including graphs and tables.
Complete the following in your presentation.
- Evaluate how U.S. trade policy changes in the last 2 years affect global trade activities by multinational corporations.
- Discuss credible economists’ opinions on the long-term effects of trade and tariff policies changes in the last 2 years.
- Explain the effect of recent changes to trade and tariff policies have had on your employer, you, or someone you know.
Cite at least 2 academically credible sources.
Compile the slides from Parts 1 and 2 into one presentation.
Submit your presentation.
Copyright© 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
ECOCB/535 Competency 3 Rubric | Page 3 of 5 | ||||
Competency Assessment Rubric | |||||
Assignment/ Performance Criteria | Mastery | Meets Expectations | Not Met | ||
100% | 85% | 0% | |||
1. Pt. 1 – Country Comparison | Thoroughly compares similarities and | Partially compares similarities and | Narrowly compares similarities and | ||
differences between chosen | differences between chosen | differences between chosen countries | |||
(weight 12%) | |||||
countries / economies and | countries / economies and | / economies and basically explains | |||
successfully explains how their | successfully explains how their | how their economic, political, and | |||
economic, political, and cultural | economic, political, and cultural | cultural development since 1992 has | |||
development since 1992 has | development since 1992 has | influenced their economic growth and | |||
influenced their economic growth and | influenced their economic growth | trade competitiveness or no attempt | |||
trade competitiveness. | and trade competitiveness. | was made to compare similarities and | |||
differences between chosen countries | |||||
/ economies nor to explain how their | |||||
economic, political, and cultural | |||||
development since 1992 has | |||||
influenced their economic growth and | |||||
trade competitiveness. | |||||
2. Pt 1– Analysis | Thoroughly analyzed economic | Partially analyzed economic | Narrowly analyzed economic | ||
(weight 12%) | statistic/indicators of two chosen | statistic/indicators of two chosen | statistic/indicators of two chosen | ||
economies including the use of tables | |||||
economies including the use of | economies including the use of tables | ||||
and/or graphs that clearly depict GDP | |||||
tables and/or graphs that clearly | and/or graphs that clearly depict GDP | ||||
per capita growth, inflation rate, | |||||
depict GDP per capita growth, | per capita growth, inflation rate, | ||||
unemployment rate, exports, and | |||||
inflation rate, unemployment rate, | unemployment rate, exports, and | ||||
national government debt as a % of | |||||
exports, and national government | national government debt as a % of | ||||
GDP over time since 2009 for each | |||||
debt as a % of GDP over time since | GDP over time since 2009 for each | ||||
chosen economy. | |||||
2009 for each chosen economy. | chosen economy or no attempt is | ||||
made to include tables and/or graphs. | |||||
3. Pt. 1 – Economic Growth | Thoroughly evaluated the reasons | Partially evaluated the reasons why | Narrowly evaluated the reasons why | ||
(weight 12%) | why the economic growth of the two | the economic growth of the two | the economic growth of the two | ||
chosen economies / countries varied | |||||
chosen economies / countries | chosen economies / countries varied; | ||||
from a creative and innovative | |||||
varied from a creative and | basically discussed how international | ||||
perspective. Clearly discusses how | |||||
innovative perspective. Clearly | trade influenced the strength of each | ||||
international trade influenced the | |||||
discusses how international trade | economy, as well as the role of value | ||||
strength of each economy, as well as | |||||
influenced the strength of each | chains and value-added production or | ||||
the role of value chains and value- | |||||
economy, as well as the role of | no attempt was made to evaluates the | ||||
added production. | |||||
value chains and value-added | reasons why the economic growth of | ||||
production. | the two chosen economies / countries | ||||
varied. Does not discuss how | |||||
international trade influenced the | |||||
strength of each economy, nor the role | |||||
of value chains and value-added | |||||
production. |
Copyright© 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
4. Pt 1 – Value-Added Trade Measures | Thoroughly analyzed how the failure | Thoroughly analyzed how the failure | Narrowly analyzed how the failure to |
(weight 12%) | to use value-added trade measures | to use value-added trade measures | use value-added trade measures |
distorts trade statistics. | |||
distorts trade statistics from a creative | distorts trade statistics or no attempt is | ||
and innovative perspective. | made to analyze how the failure to use | ||
value-added trade measures distorts | |||
trade statistics. | |||
5. Pt 1 – Comparative Advantage in | Thoroughly examined more than 2 | Thoroughly examined 2 industries | Narrowly examined 1 or 2 industries |
World Trade | industries that have provided each | that have provided each economy a | that have provided each economy a |
economy a comparative advantage in | comparative advantage in world | comparative advantage in world trade | |
(weight 12%) | world trade. | trade. | or no attempt is made to examine |
industries that have provided each | |||
economy a comparative advantage in | |||
world trade. | |||
6. Pt 2 – US Trade Policy Changes | Thoroughly evaluated how US trade | Partially evaluated how US trade | Narrowly evaluated how US trade |
(weight 12%) | policy changes in the last 2 years | policy changes in the last 2 years | policy changes in the last 2 years |
affect global trade activities by | affect global trade activities by | affect global trade activities by | |
multinational corporations. | multinational corporations. | multinational corporations or no | |
attempt to evaluate how US trade | |||
policy changes in the last 2 years has | |||
affected global trade activities by | |||
multinational corporations was made. | |||
7. Pt 2 – Economists’ Opinions | Thoroughly discussed long-term | Partially discussed long-term effects | Narrowly discussed long-term effects |
(weight 12%) | effects of trade and tariff policy | of trade and tariff policy changes | of trade and tariff policy changes over |
changes over the last 2 years. | over the last 2 years. | the last 2 years or no attempt to | |
discuss long-term effects of trade and | |||
tariff policy changes over the last 2 | |||
years was made. | |||
8. Pt 2 – Recent Changes to Trade and | Thoroughly explained the effect of | Partially explained the effect of | Narrowly explained the effect of recent |
Tariff Policies | recent changes to trade and tariff | recent changes to trade and tariff | changes to trade and tariff policies |
(weight 12%) | |||
policies have had on your employer, | policies have had on your employer, | have had on your employer, you, or | |
you, or someone you know. | you, or someone you know. | someone you know or no attempt to | |
explain the effect of recent changes to | |||
trade and tariff policies have had on | |||
your employer, you, or someone you | |||
know was made. |
Copyright© 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
9. Communication | Accurate application of mechanical | Rare occurrences of mechanical, | Occasional or frequent occurrences of |
(weight 2%) | conventions enhanced the content; | grammar or sentence structure | mechanical, grammar, or sentence |
included accurate grammar and | errors did not detract from the | structure errors detracted some from | |
sentence structure. PowerPoint | content. PowerPoint presentation | the content. PowerPoint presentation | |
presentation includes 18-22 slides | includes 14-16 slides with clearly | includes 11-13 slides with clearly | |
with clearly detailed speaker’s notes | detailed speaker’s notes and | detailed speaker’s notes and | |
and graphically pleasing visual | graphically pleasing visual elements | graphically pleasing visual elements | |
elements including graphs and | including graphs and tables. | including graphs and tables. Speaker | |
tables. Speaker notes clearly convey | Speaker notes clearly convey the | notes clearly convey the details you | |
the details you would give if you were | details you would give if you were | would give if you were presenting. | |
presenting. | presenting. | ||
10. Information Literacy | Fully integrated relevant supporting | Mostly integrated relevant | Minimally integrated relevant |
(weight 2%) | evidence from quality sources. | supporting evidence from quality | supporting evidence from quality |
sources. | |||
sources or did not integrate relevant | |||
supporting evidence from quality | |||
sources. |