Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.

 SHAPE  * MERGEFORMAT

Drag a file here, or

Choose a file to upload

I agree to the tool’s End-User License AgreementLinks to an
external site.

This assignment submission is my
own, original work

*

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism

Concept Application

20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentThe student meets 90% to 100% of the
required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements
and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other
contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with
the assignment instructions.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by
recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying
proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects.
Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment
instructions.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing
rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories,
definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information
is compliant with the assignment instructions.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a
low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of
application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects.
However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment
instructions.

12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

Written Communication

20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentExcellence in grammar, spelling, and
sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodMinimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or
translation errors

16 to >14.0 ptsFairMultiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or
translation errors.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorSevere (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or
translation errors.

12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableUnacceptable (11 or more) typos,
spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Specific Formatting

20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90 % – 100% of
the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally,
the presented information is complete in all the required components and
exceeds expectations.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in
the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all
the necessary components and formatting requirements.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in
the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing
some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in
the description. The presented information is missing some key details that
disrupt the needed formatting.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic,
and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and
Logical Thinking

Thought analysis process

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details,
situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly
documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis
along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details,
situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and
correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental
thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the
assignment expectations.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details,
situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential
parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece
is evident; however, still developing.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations,
problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some
essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented
in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions
or information.

12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy

Quality of Sources and APA Citations

20 to
>18.0 ptsExcellentSupporting information is pertinent
to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from
credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested
amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is
not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent
(depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of
sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on
the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors
within the in-text citations or references.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources
are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent
(depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of
sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting,
setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and
references.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe following criteria would apply, supporting information is not
pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted
sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers
severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or
problematic in-text citations and references.

12 to
>0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts