(Answers)-NURS 6501-Assessment 2-Unit 20-Online Nursing Assignment Help
5 min read
2 PAGES
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
The Assignment
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis.
|
30 to >27.0 PtsExcellentThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
27 to >24.0 PtsGoodThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. … The response supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
24 to >22.0 PtsFairThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
22 to >0 PtsPoorThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include rationales, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
|
30 pts
|
|
What role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease?
|
25 to >22.0 PtsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
22 to >19.0 PtsGoodThe response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
19 to >17.0 PtsFairThe response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
17 to >0 PtsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing.
|
25 pts
|
|
What is the impact of the disease on the immune system? …… How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease?
|
30 to >27.0 PtsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the impact of the disease on the immune system. Response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease.
27 to >24.0 PtsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.
24 to >17.0 PtsFairThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.
17 to >0 PtsPoorThe response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system.
|
30 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.
|
5 to >4.0 PtsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … Content is supported by current evidence-based sources.
4 to >3.0 PtsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.
3 to >2.0 PtsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources.
2 to >0 PtsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No content is supported by current evidence-based source.
|
5 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
5 to >4.0 PtsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 PtsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 PtsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 PtsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
5 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
5 to >4.0 PtsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 PtsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 PtsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 PtsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
5 pts
|
Total points: 100
Academic Writer & Editor