(Answers)-NURS 8210-Assessment: Week 10-Unit 20-Online Nursing Assignment Help
admin
7 min read
To Prepare
- Review the “Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice” learning resource to explore competencies related to nursing practice.
- Consider the role of competencies in nursing practice. Which competencies may be the most beneficial for project management and nursing informatics?
- Reflect on which skills you might currently possess and how you might become competent in others.
The Assignment: (4–5 pages)
- Explain what competencies are most important and beneficial for your success as a leader in your practice. Be specific and provide examples.
- Appraise the leadership strategies, addressed in Informatics Leadership Standard 11, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Be specific.
- Analyze whether or not you currently have these skills. Then, explain approaches you might recommend implementing to become competent or more proficient in this skill.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_8210_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Explain what competencies are most important and beneficial for your success as a leader in your practice. Be specific and provide examples.
|
40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail what competencies are most important and beneficial for success as a leader in practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided.
35 to >31.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided.
31 to >27.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided.
27 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains what competencies are most beneficial and important for success as a leader in practice, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the responses provided, or it is missing.
|
40 pts
|
|
Appraise the leadership strategies, addressed in Standard 11, that you might employ to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. Be specific.
|
25 to >21.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response accurately and fully aligns with Standard 11 with sufficient detail to support the recommended strategies. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided.
21 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response accurately aligns with Standard 11 and may support the recommended strategies. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided.
19 to >16.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives. … The response inaccurately or vaguely aligns with Standard 11 and may support the recommend strategies. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided.
16 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the leadership strategies recommended to establish a culture that supports new information technology initiatives, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely aligns with Standard 11 and does not support the recommended strategies, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the responses provided, or it is missing.
|
25 pts
|
|
Analyze whether or not you currently have these skills. Then, explain approaches you might recommend implementing to become competent or more proficient in this skill.
|
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the student already has working knowledge of and use of the skills identified. … The response accurately and clearly explains in detail approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.
17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified. … The response accurately explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.
15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified. … The response inaccurately or vaguely explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill.
13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the student already has working knowledge and use of the skills identified, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely explains approaches recommended to become more proficient in this skill, or it is missing.
|
20 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
5 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
5 pts
|
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
5 pts
|
Total Points: 100
admin
Academic Writer & Editor