Professional Nursing Organizations: Please provide the assignment brief
Professional Nursing Organizations and Engagement
Professional nursing organizations actively support nurses in and out of the workplace. Along with supporting nurses, these organizations often lobby for and support policy changes to improve healthcare practices for both nurses and patients. As a part of these organizations, a nurse can actively participate as a change agent.
In this Assignment, you will consider which professional nursing organization might best fit your political and civic engagement. You will also reflect on how these organizations might impact health equity.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources assigned in this module.
- Review the APA resources in the Walden University Writing Center.
- Research the BSN Hub – Career Resource HubLinks to an external site. – Academic Guides at Walden University to explore professional nursing organizations and their civic engagement efforts. On the webpage, scroll down to the Networking Support section to find a list of professional associations or organizations to consider.
- Research (utilizing the resources provided in this module) a professional nursing organization to discover the group’s civic engagement.
Reflect on the health equity connection between the organization and the engagement.
The Assignment (2-3 pages)
Construct a 2- or 3-page paper in which you explore the political and civic engagement of a professional nursing organization. Provide clear connections to health equity and the impact of the organization.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.) provides an example of those required elements.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn2_LastName_FirstInitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
- File Upload
- Text Entry
| Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded. | |
|
Drag a file here, or
Choose a file to upload
|
|
|
|
|
|
This assignment submission is my own, original work
|
|
Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
Identified political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization
|
40 to >30.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly identifies political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
30 to >24.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response identifies political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification.
24 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies political and/or civic engagement in a professional nursing organization, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support identification, or it is missing.
|
40 pts
|
|
Described connection to health equity and the impact of the organization
|
40 to >30.0 pts Masters Expectations The response comprehensively and clearly describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
30 to >24.0 pts Achieves Expectations The response describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
24 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support description, or it is missing.
|
40 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Context, organization, audience, purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
|
10 to >7.33 pts Masters Expectations Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
7.33 to >6.0 pts Achieves Expectations Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
6 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
|
10 pts
|
|
Professional writing: Originality, source credibility, and attribution of ideas
|
10 to >7.33 pts Masters Expectations Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
7.33 to >6.0 pts Achieves Expectations Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
6 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
|
10 pts
|
You can also explore more resources on our website.